Papers for

medical statisticians

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Debiasing prior-data fitted networks improves semi-parametric Bayesian inference

Debiased Prior-Data Fitted Networks for Amortized Bayesian Semi-Parametric Inference

Abstract: Prior-data fitted networks (PFNs) have recently gained popularity as an end-to-end approach to amortized Bayesian inference. Yet, their statistical behavior for semi-parametric targets, such as means under missingness or causal effects, remains poorly understood. In this work, we develop theoretical foundations for debiased PFNs to perform inference on finite-dimensional targets in general semi-parametric settings. First, we show that, despite being Bayes-optimal with respect to the target, an idealized PFN can exhibit a posterior concentration rate that implicitly depends on the concentration rates of (latent) nuisance functions and can become slower as the prior becomes more diverse. Then, to speed up the target posterior concentration rates, we introduce two generic debiasing strategies based on efficient influence functions: (i) a label correction and (ii) a prior correction. Finally, we show that the debiased PFNs (i) & (ii) possess concentration rates that asymptotically match a convergence rate given by traditional frequentist bias-corrected estimators. In this way, we establish a novel connection between amortized Bayesian inference with PFNs and frequentist semi-parametric efficiency theory. Under additional assumptions, this allows us to guarantee local and global optimality of PFN-based estimators (namely, the Bernstein-von Mises property and minimax optimality, respectively). Therefore, our work provides guidelines for designing debiased PFNs for semi-parametric inference with principled and provable asymptotic guarantees.

Tue 20 OctMachine Learning
The gist
When estimating things like averages or causal effects from complicated data, machines can use something called prior-data fitted networks (PFNs) to make quick predictions. However, these networks sometimes learn too slowly or become biased because they rely on assumptions that might not be perfect. The authors studied why this happens and introduced ways to correct these biases, making the networks more accurate and faster at learning. Their corrections bring these machine learning methods closer to traditional proven statistical techniques and give mathematical guarantees about their performance.
Open → 2610.28314v1

Normalizing flows find key statistics even with nuisance parameters

Likelihood-free inference with nuisance parameters through normalizing flows

Abstract: We present a simple decomposition of a neural-network-based normalizing flow that naturally uncovers a pivotal statistic (or something close) in the presence of nuisance parameters, based only on a sample generator from the distribution of interest. We show that the statistic is near-pivotal in the sense of minimum average KL-divergence of its $p$-values versus uniform and we argue that it can be expected to have good power when the dimension of the statistic equals the dimension of the parameter. It is able to incorporate prior knowledge about group invariances such as translation and scale. It can discover the one-sample $t$-test almost exactly, outperforms the Welch test in terms of worst-case size over a constrained variance-ratio range and achieves good calibration on partial biserial correlations, while showing higher power (and being much faster) on small-to-moderate samples than profile likelihood-ratio techniques.

Wed 9 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Many scientific problems have important variables mixed with nuisance factors that are not of direct interest. The authors show a way to use neural networks called normalizing flows to separate out key statistics that behave reliably despite those nuisance factors. This method only needs the ability to generate sample data and can handle prior knowledge like shifts or scaling in data. The technique matches or beats classical tests in accuracy and speed on small to moderate data samples.
Open → 2609.10534v1