Papers for
medical simulation trainers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Clinical language models struggle to gather and assess patient information
KlinikeBench: Evaluating Language Models Beyond Diagnostic Accuracy
Abstract: Most clinical benchmarks evaluate language models (LMs) on diagnosis using complete case descriptions. In clinical practice, however, patients present information in different ways, and clinicians must obtain relevant history and determine which examinations are needed before reaching a diagnosis. Diagnostic accuracy alone therefore cannot establish whether an agent gathered essential information or conducted an appropriate clinical assessment. Furthermore, existing benchmarks lack professional clinicians' verification. To address this gap, we introduce KlinikeBench, a benchmark of 333 clinician-authored tasks, each providing an isolated sandbox environment with a virtual patient, clinical tools, and task-specific success criteria. More than 35 clinicians contributed to case authoring and benchmark evaluation. In an empirical study, clinicians gave simulated dialogues higher mean quality ratings than reference conversations, which is adapted from real conversation. In each task, an LM has a fixed budget of turns to communicate with the patient, ask about relevant history, request examinations, follow action constraints, and record a final diagnosis. We score these steps separately as well as together. Across 31 models and seven model families, the best-performing models (e.g., GPT-6-astra and Claude Opus 5) succeed on less than 30% of tasks, even though their diagnosis accuracy reaches 90.7%. Some models benefit from talking with the patient; others diagnose well from a complete chart but perform much worse in conversation. Overall, KlinikeBench provides a testbed for evaluating the full clinical encounter and reveals a substantial gap between diagnostic accuracy and performance in interactive clinical assessment.
Autonomous navigation challenged for flexible robotic colonoscopes
ARCGym: Benchmarking Deep Reinforcement Learning in Autonomous Robotic Colonoscopy
Abstract: Simulations for learning-based autonomous colonoscopic navigation focus mainly on fully actuated capsule robots, failing to capture the contact-rich navigation of long and flexible clinical colonoscopes. We present the Autonomous Robotic Colonoscopy Gym (ARCGym), an open-source reinforcement learning environment and benchmark for image-based navigation in clinically derived deformable colon anatomies. ARCGym supports multiple types of colonoscope robots, spanning capsule robots and flexible endoscopes, with this work focusing on flexible endoscopes including magnetic-driven tip actuation and clinically used proximally translational actuation. This work includes five CT-reconstructed colons representing typical clinical scenarios, a set of clinically meaningful navigation subtasks, and unified success metrics. We introduce a reward combining depth-based lumen alignment with a lumen-visibility score to improve learning under occlusions. Experiments across tasks, robots, and anatomies show that autonomous navigation remains challenging for both magnetic-driven and proximal-insertion flexible robots, with proximal-insertion actuation remaining an open problem.