Papers for
media verification services
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Improved deepfake detection with shared and private audio visual features
Shared-Private Cross-Modal Discrepancy Learning for Imbalanced Multi-Source Audio-Visual Deepfake Detection
Abstract: Audio-visual deepfake detectors are often trained under a single dataset or manipulation regime, but multi-source training collections may contain heterogeneous attacks and uneven source distributions. Training separate detectors for each source is inefficient, while a single shared detector may be biased toward dominant source-specific patterns. We study known-source imbalanced multi-source audio-visual deepfake detection using FakeAVCeleb and LAV-DF, where source identity is supplied during training and inference. To address this setting, we build on the Multi-Scale Cross-Modal Transformer Encoder (MSCT) and propose Pre-MSCT Shared-Private Feature Fusion. Our method routes \texttt{[CLS]}-augmented audio and visual tokens into a shared stream and source-specific private streams before the first MSCT block, while retaining its internal multi-scale self-attention (MSSA), differential cross-modal attention (DCA), and feed-forward operations. The shared stream models cross-source reusable evidence, while the private streams retain source-dependent residual variations. A domain-aware gated residual fusion module injects selected private evidence into the shared representation for the main fused prediction. Experiments under two controlled source-composition protocols show improved macro and worst-source AUC compared with the MRDF and MSCT baselines. These results support shared-private cross-modal discrepancy learning in the evaluated two-source setting with known source identity.
AI generated videos detected by tracking motion consistency patterns
TRACE: Trajectory Representation and Consistency Estimation for AI-Generated Video Detection
Abstract: Recent advances in generative video models have enabled the synthesis of visually realistic content, posing significant challenges to synthetic video detection. Existing detectors often rely on appearance artifacts, semantic inconsistencies, and temporal patterns that may be generator-specific, limitating generalization to unseen synthesis models. We investigate whether responses to a pretrained generative model provide more transferable forensic cues. Our key observation is that real and AI-generated videos exhibit distinct \emph{velocity responses} under a pretrained Flow Matching video model. This distinction persists when different pretrained video-generation backbones are used as probes, suggesting that velocity responses offer transferable forensic signals beyond visual artificts. Motivated by this observation, we propose \textbf{TRACE} (\emph{\underline{T}rajectory \underline{R}epresentation \underline{a}nd \underline{C}onsistency \underline{E}stimation}), a generation-process-aware framework for AI-generated video detection. TRACE leverages a pretrained video DiT as a velocity-field probe to extract representations at multiple flow time points, and models cross-frame consistency through velocity differences between adjacent frames. We further introduce a \emph{Real-Centered Trajectory Optimization} objective that encourages generator-invariant representation learning. Extensive experiments on AIGVDBench demonstrate that TRACE generalizes effectively across diverse generators, substantially outperforming prior state-of-the-art methods on unseen open- and closed-source video generation models.
AI generated videos become almost impossible to detect by humans or tools
DF26: We Cannot Tell Fake From Real Anymore
Abstract: We introduce DF26, a novel benchmark for detecting AI-generated videos containing fully synthetic clips produced by recent text-to-video and image-to-video models. The videos capture single-person public-speaking scenarios, spanning direct-to-camera recordings, official statements, and studio interviews - 271 real and 2,420 synthetic videos generated by seven modern video models. The study on DF26 shows that human performance in detecting AI-generated videos, as well as state-of-the-art deepfake detectors, is close to random chance. Our results highlight the limitations of current evaluation protocols and motivate the need for benchmarks that explicitly measure robustness to modern generative model distribution shifts.