Papers for

media content curators

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Video captioning improves with detailed multi-step reward learning

MVRCap: Towards Comprehensive Video Captioning via Hierarchical Multi-Dimensional Verifiable Rewards

Abstract: Despite significant progress, current models struggle to generate comprehensive video captions, constrained primarily by coarse-grained supervision, which often fails to capture spatial-temporal dynamics and the underlying logical intent. To address this issue, we introduce MVRCap, a novel framework that reformulates video captioning as a reinforcement learning task steered by structured verification. Central to our approach is a Fine-Grained Verifiable Reward mechanism, serving as dense supervision to enforce rigorous visual-semantic alignment. Specifically, we construct this reward system anchored by three complementary pillars: a Hierarchical Concept Coverage Reward utilizing our newly constructed MVRCap-QA dataset to ensure multi-dimensional completeness and semantic depth, a Factuality Verification Reward to enhance factual consistency, and a Conciseness Constraint to maximize semantic density. Furthermore, we curate the high-quality MVRCap-SFT dataset, providing structured annotations across six key dimensions, to serve as a robust foundational initialization for the RL policy in this training pipeline. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MVRCap achieves state-of-the-art performance on authoritative benchmarks including VDC, CAPability, and VC4VG.

Tue 27 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Creating accurate and detailed descriptions for videos is hard because computers usually learn from simple feedback that doesn’t fully capture everything in the video. The authors designed a new system called MVRCap that teaches computers to write better captions by giving them more detailed and careful feedback along several aspects, such as covering many things in the video, making sure the facts are right, and keeping captions clear and concise. They also created special datasets to help the system learn. Their experiments show this method works better than previous ones on popular video captioning tests.
Open → 2610.36838v1

Text meets video with better focus and detailed query matching

Text-Video Retrieval via Multi-Dimensional Saliency Assessment and Granularity-Aware Query Decomposition

Abstract: Text-video retrieval, which aims to bridge visual and textual modalities by learning a joint embedding space, has become a crucial task in multimodal intelligence. Despite extensive efforts to mitigate visual redundancy, previous methods typically rely on a single-aspect criterion to assess visual importance, overlooking the multifaceted spatiotemporal nature of video. In addition, encoding text into a single global embedding to align with videos compresses temporal events and spatial entities into a unified representation space, further aggravating cross-modal misalignment. To address these issues, we propose MMTI, a method that jointly mitigates visual redundancy and enables multi-grained text-video interaction to achieve accurate multi-grained semantic alignment. Specifically, a key feature selection (KFS) mechanism adaptively identifies and aggregates informative frames and patches by jointly evaluating multi-dimensional saliency and learnable importance scores, effectively compacting dense visual features and mitigating visual redundancy. Furthermore, our proposed multi-grained text-video interaction module (TVIM) employs a dynamic gating mechanism to decompose the text query into sentence, frame, and patch queries (SFP), enabling multi-grained text-video alignment. Complementary alignment at different granularities is thereby achieved. Extensive experiments on four standard benchmarks demonstrate that our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods.

Wed 30 SeptInformation Retrieval
The gist
Finding the right video based on a text description is tricky because videos have many moments and details, and text summaries often miss this complexity. The authors created a method that picks out important parts of a video by looking at different visual cues and scores. Their approach also breaks down the text into smaller parts to match video details at multiple levels, like whole scenes or tiny patches. This leads to better matching between the text and the correct parts of videos.
Open → 2609.38949v1