Papers for

materials simulation teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Extreme-scale quantum simulations of materials reach 100 million atoms

Extreme-Scale Linear-Scaling Kohn-Sham DFT at 100 Million Atoms: Bridging Quantum Simulations and Experiments

Abstract: Kohn-Sham density functional theory (DFT) remains the workhorse of ab initio materials simulation, yet cubic computational and quadratic memory scaling have confined calculations to a few hundred to thousands of atoms, spanning only nanometers, far below experimentally relevant length scales. We introduce XLSDFT, a linear-scaling DFT framework based on divide-and-conquer decomposition of the one-particle density matrix and Chebyshev-filtered subspace iteration, achieving linear computational and memory scaling while retaining DFT accuracy. Deployed on the LineShine exascale supercomputer, XLSDFT reduces computational complexity by orders of magnitude, enabling unprecedented DFT scale: a 200-million-atom silicon crystal, twentyfold beyond the prior record. Our implementation achieves 96.6% weak-scaling efficiency and sustained 157.9 Pflop/s (FP64) for a 100-million-atom scaling study. We further simulate an 11-million-atom all-solid-state battery interface of unprecedented complexity, 1,000 times beyond prior DFT for such systems, revealing how lithium metal reacts with the solid electrolyte at atomic resolution, in quantitative agreement with spectroscopy experiments.

Fri 11 SeptComputational Engineering, Finance, and ScienceDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing
The gist
Simulating materials at the level of individual atoms is usually very slow and limited to tiny pieces. The authors created a new method called XLSDFT that speeds up these simulations dramatically while keeping them accurate. They used this to simulate a silicon crystal with 200 million atoms and a complex battery interface with over 11 million atoms, much bigger than before. Their simulations matched real experiments, helping us understand how lithium interacts with battery materials at the atomic level.
Open 2609.13115v1

MLIP Detective finds hidden errors in machine-learning atomic models

MLIP Detective: Active Failure Mode Discovery Beyond Benchmark Scores for Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials

Abstract: Universal machine-learning interatomic potentials (u-MLIPs) aim to generalize across diverse configurations. Benchmarks enable reproducible evaluation but may not expose failures outside their predefined scope. Here, we show that physics-informed search can complement benchmark-based evaluation by uncovering hidden failure modes. We introduce MLIP Detective, an agentic framework for active failure mode discovery. Starting from benchmark evidence, MLIP Detective generates falsifiable, physics-informed failure hypotheses, screens them with inexpensive simulations, and escalates only the most suspicious cases to human experts together with proposed verification protocols. Without issue-specific prompting, MLIP Detective identified and characterized a systematic anomaly in MACE-MPA-0: the model predicted some relaxed adsorbate-surface systems involving O- or F-containing adsorbates to be higher in energy than their corresponding separated fragments. Using cross-model comparisons, MLIP Detective further inferred a likely training-data origin for the anomaly, consistent with recent reports.

Tue 8 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) are tools used to predict how atoms behave, but sometimes they fail in ways not visible in standard tests. The authors created MLIP Detective, which uses physics knowledge to actively search for and identify hidden mistakes in these models. For example, it found that a popular model incorrectly predicted certain molecules on surfaces to be less stable than they should be. MLIP Detective can help improve MLIPs by pointing out such errors and suggesting ways to verify them.
Open 2609.08399v1

Topology limits pure state models for quantum ground states

Topology Obstructs Pure Foundation Neural Quantum States

Abstract: Foundation models for ground states in spin-1/2 systems are a promising method for problems ranging from quantum chemistry to identifying new phase diagrams. Nearly all such models are currently pure-states that condition on the Hamiltonian's parameters, whose Monte Carlo samples give energy estimates according to the variational principle. In this contribution, we show that this representation is topologically obstructed. For any gapped Hamiltonian family whose ground-state bundle is non-trivial, every continuous normalized state-vector model has zero fidelity with the ground state at some parameter value in the Hamiltonian family. For that value, the energy is at least one spectral gap, $Δ$, with an $O(Δ)$ gap in an open-neighbourhood of that point. We show that this is a sufficient no-go also in the case of degenerate ground-state manifolds, time dynamics, and periodic systems with mixed space-time topology, demonstrating these obstructions on one- and two-qubit systems. We discuss how this causes a spike in the fidelity susceptibility, giving a numerical signature of a phase-transition where there is none. We then show that operator-valued models canonically avoid these obstructions and preserve topological information, implying a structural necessity in representation for foundation neural quantum states.

Mon 7 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Foundation models help find quantum systems' lowest energy states, but the authors show a hidden problem: the shape of these states’ space prevents pure-state models from perfectly matching the true ground states everywhere. This means models can suddenly fail badly for certain conditions, giving false signals of phase changes. They prove that using more complex operator-based models solves this problem, keeping important topological information intact.
Open 2609.07591v1