Papers for

materials modeling teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

System size affects uncertainty estimates in machine learning atom models

Does System Size Matter in Uncertainty Quantification for Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials?

Abstract: Machine-learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) commonly use uncertainty estimates to flag out-of-distribution (OOD) configurations and select structures for active learning. A key question is whether the resulting structure-level uncertainty scores remain comparable across different system sizes. A common practice is to aggregate per-atom uncertainties by their mean or maximum and compare the resulting score against a fixed threshold, implicitly assuming such comparability. We test this assumption across several in-distribution (ID)/OOD pairs by characterizing both aggregations as a function of atom count. The two aggregations exhibit distinct size dependencies. Mean aggregation remains size-independent for homogeneous systems but loses sensitivity to defects in large cells. In contrast, maximum aggregation grows with system size for ID systems while remaining approximately flat for defect-containing systems, narrowing the ID-OOD gap in a manner consistent with extreme-value statistics. Although highly uncertain atoms in large structures may indicate novel local environments, retraining on these structures yields little improvement, in contrast to retraining on OOD structures constructed to lie outside the training distribution. Our results reveal a practical limitation of size-unaware uncertainty criteria and motivate size-aware calibration for more reliable OOD detection in large-scale atomistic simulations.

Thu 29 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Scientists use machine learning models to predict how atoms interact, and these models estimate how uncertain their predictions are to spot unusual structures. This paper shows that the size of the atomic system changes how these uncertainty scores behave, especially when combining per-atom uncertainties into a single number. The findings reveal that common ways to measure uncertainty don't always work well for larger systems, which can lead to missing unusual atomic environments. The authors suggest calibrating these uncertainty estimates based on system size to better detect new structures.
Open → 2610.40126v1

Gaussian clouds speed up quantum chemistry simulations to thousands of atoms

Scaling Density Functional Theory with Gaussian Splatting

Abstract: Density functional theory (DFT) strikes a practical balance between accuracy and computational cost in many problems of computational chemistry and materials science. However, many DFT calculations are limited by fixed atom-centered basis sets, which dictate how accuracy and cost scale with system size. We propose Gaussian Splatting for Density Functional Theory (GS-DFT), which represents molecular orbitals as a cloud of Gaussians whose positions, shapes, and mixing coefficients are optimized jointly by gradient descent to minimize the energy without training data. Conceptually, GS-DFT is 3D Gaussian splatting with the renderer replaced by quantum mechanics. We introduce two key solver components: adaptive density fitting with screening for efficient evaluation of two-electron integrals, and a regularized differentiable orthogonalization of the molecular orbitals. Empirically, the optimized basis reaches the accuracy of the largest conventional basis sets with a fraction of the parameters, converging systematically in energy, density, and nuclear forces. At equal parameter count, it captures the stretched-bond and anion physics that fixed bases only recover with specialized basis augmentation. The resulting solver exhibits quadratic peak memory scaling in the cloud size, allowing us to simulate systems of up to 2,742 atoms (10,406 electrons) without any modifications at triple-zeta scale using a single four-GPU node.

Fri 25 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Calculating the properties of molecules and materials accurately usually takes a lot of computer work because traditional methods rely on fixed mathematical building blocks centered on atoms. This paper introduces a new technique where shapes called Gaussians float freely and change to better describe molecules, optimizing themselves using quantum mechanics rules. This approach reaches high accuracy with fewer parameters and scales well to very large systems, allowing simulations of thousands of atoms on a standard GPU setup. The method also better captures tricky cases like stretched bonds and charged molecules that older methods struggle with.
Open → 2609.31483v1