Papers for

materials design engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Model generates molecule shapes that change with environment

EVA-Flow: Learning Shared Chemistry for Unified Environment-Aware Molecular Conformation Generation

Abstract: Molecular 3D structures underpin simulations of thermodynamics, kinetics, crystallization, and nucleation, making their accurate prediction central to drug discovery and materials design. However, molecular geometry can change dramatically across environments. Existing models either ignore environmental effects or train separate models for each environment. We hypothesize that transfer learning across contexts is possible for conformer generation and that a general model will perform better when training data are limited, as in ligand binding and crystallization. We introduce EVA-Flow, a unified framework for environment-aware molecular conformation generation that learns shared chemical structure and adapts it through environment-conditioned generative modeling. Across vacuum, protein-ligand docking, solvation, and crystal packing, pretraining and cross-environment finetuning provide their largest gains in the three data-scarce settings. Evaluation against multiple reference conformations shows that EVA-Flow covers a broad range of solvation conformations. Analyses of molecules shared across environments support its ability to generate different conformations for the same molecule in different environments.

Mon 26 OctMachine LearningComputational Engineering, Finance, and Science
The gist
Molecules can change their shape depending on where they are, like in water or inside a protein. Most current tools either ignore these environment changes or need a separate model for each one. The authors introduce EVA-Flow, which learns general chemical shape patterns and then adjusts for different environments in one model. It works well especially when there is little data for some settings and can create different shapes for the same molecule depending on the surroundings.
Open → 2610.36280v1

Improving energies and densities in machine-learned quantum functionals

Stationarity Constraints Improve Both Energies and Densities of Machine-Learned Exchange-Correlation Functionals

Abstract: Empirical exchange-correlation functionals are fitted on fixed orbitals but used self-consistently, so better energies often come with worse densities. We show that the Brillouin residual of a trained functional on the Kohn-Sham orbitals of an accurate density controls, to first order, both the self-consistent density shift and the gap between fitted and self-consistent energies. Penalizing it requires no self-consistent-field solution during training. Trained on 6 energies and 11 CCSD densities, a neural meta-GGA surpasses SCAN in both atomization energies and densities of unseen molecules.

Wed 21 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Predicting how electrons behave in molecules is important but tricky, especially when using machine learning to improve calculations. The authors found that measuring a certain error in their trained functionals helps fix both energy predictions and the electron distributions at the same time. By including this check during training, they avoid complex computations and achieve better results than some existing methods on new molecules. This advances more accurate computer models of molecules.
Open → 2610.30022v1

Diffusion models guided to find rare events much faster

Steering Diffusion Models to Rare Events with Sequential Monte Carlo

Abstract: Diffusion models are increasingly used as surrogates for expensive simulators in weather prediction, molecular dynamics, and materials design. In these models, computing the probability $p_0[E]$ of an event $E$ is difficult, especially when the event of interest is rare. A stable estimate using Monte Carlo becomes computationally intractable, requiring a growing sample size $\propto\!1/p_0[E]$ to compensate for an increasing rarity. In this paper, we present Diffusion Importance Sampling of Rare Events or DireSMC, a sequential Monte Carlo scheme that guides a population of weighted samples towards the rare event, giving access not only to samples but also to a calibrated estimate of its probability. We set up our guidance using an analytical relaxation of the event set, allowing the method to easily extend to a wide range of user-defined rare events. We validate our method on a toy problem with analytical solutions and on a score-based climate emulator, where we obtain accurate rare-event probabilities on a range of rarities from $10^{-3}$ to $10^{-5}$, achieving net speed-ups of $9\times$ to $1413\times$ over Monte Carlo.

Tue 6 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Some computer models help predict unusual events, but spotting very rare ones can take a lot of time because they happen so infrequently. The authors came up with a smarter way to focus on these rare cases by guiding many guesses closer to the rare event, making it easier to estimate how likely they are. Their method works with different kinds of rare events and was tested on simple examples and climate models, showing it can be hundreds to over a thousand times faster than usual methods.
Open → 2610.08652v1

Using electron density improves machine learning of molecular spectra

Electronic Density versus Geometry for Machine-Learned Molecular Absorption Spectra

Abstract: Molecular optical absorption spectroscopy provides a direct probe of electronic structure and is widely used for molecular identification, interpretation of photophysical behaviour, and planning of spectroscopy experiments. Calculating the absorption spectra using first-principle excited-state methods, however, is computationally demanding, at least compared to ground-state calculations, which limits their routine application across large molecular sets. Machine-learning (ML) surrogates can reduce this cost and allow rapid spectral prediction. However, their performance depends strongly on how molecular information is represented. Here, we compare using the ground-state electron density versus the molecular geometry as inputs to a ML model for predicting absorption spectra, for a training set of 6874 molecules selected from the QM7 dataset. For each of these molecules, the density was calculated using density functional theory (DFT) and the absorption spectrum was calculated using linear-response (LR) time-dependent DFT (TDDFT). Utilizing the ground-state density as the input to the ML model is motivated by the Hohenberg-Kohn and Runge-Gross theorems, and the fact that the ground-state density encodes information about bonding, charge localisation, and electronic delocalisation. Hence, it may be a more judicious starting point for the ML model compared to the geometry, as it effectively decouples the chemistry of the ground-state. The question we test is whether the benefits of using the density outweigh the (notprohibitive) penalty of requiring an additional single-point DFT calculation for the density. We find that the density-based convolutional neural network achieves a validation correlation of 0.9926, compared with 0.9795 for the best geometry-based graph model, reducing the residual decorrelation, by approximately 64%.

Fri 2 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Predicting how molecules absorb light helps identify and understand them, but accurate calculations are slow. This paper compares two ways to teach computers to predict these absorption patterns: one using the molecule’s shape and the other using a detailed map of its electrons. The researchers show that using the electron map gives more accurate predictions, even if it takes extra calculation time upfront. This means machines can better estimate molecular behavior faster once trained.
Open → 2610.03444v1

Pairwise expert rankings speed up discovery of promising scientific designs

Scientific Discovery under Validation Congestion via Multi-Fidelity Pairwise Rankings

Abstract: Modern computational methods can now propose candidate molecules, materials, and other scientific designs at an unprecedented scale, creating a validation congestion where candidates are abundant, but experimental capacity to physically evaluate them remains scarce. Discovering novel scientific designs has therefore become increasingly dependent on curation: selecting a small set of promising designs for slow and costly experiments. Existing curation methods typically rely on data-driven regression models that predict absolute scores, but training these models requires substantial experimental data to begin with. Yet, useful curation signals do not have to take the form of absolute measurements, as scientific design discovery is often comparative in nature. Here, we propose that curation can instead be primarily driven by expert pairwise rankings, which are substantially easier to gather. The expertise can come from computational tools or human input of multiple levels of fidelity, ranging from empirical rules of thumb to agentic workflows and experienced scientists. We introduce PRISMS, a framework that uses pairwise rankings from one or more experts, potentially spanning multiple levels of expertise, to identify the most promising candidates without relying on data-hungry regressors. When experts differ in fidelity and cost, PRISMS escalates pairwise queries from lower- to higher-fidelity rankers based on a Fisher-information criterion. In iterative screening that selects designs from fixed drug discovery libraries, PRISMS achieves 50% top-10 discovery recall in ~42% fewer rounds than regression-only active learning, and in ~15% fewer rounds than the ranking-based method with no selective escalation. In optimization that generates new designs without restriction to a predefined library, PRISMS achieves ~18.8% higher hypervolume than the Bayesian optimization baseline.

Thu 1 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Finding new molecules or materials is hard because there are too many possibilities to test physically. The paper’s authors show that instead of relying on absolute measurements, researchers can use simpler pairwise comparisons—deciding which of two candidates looks better. Their method, called PRISMS, combines judgments from various experts or tools with different accuracy levels to pick the best candidates faster. This approach reduces the need for large amounts of data and speeds up finding promising designs in drug discovery and other fields.
Open → 2610.01827v1