Papers for

machine learning system maintainers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Causal chain of thought improves reasoning by isolating context

Causal Chain of Thought: Mitigating Attention Leakage via Context Isolation

Abstract: Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting elicits step-by-step rationales that appear to explain model predictions, but there is no guarantee these steps causally drive the final answer. In standard autoregressive generation, dense attention allows each reasoning step to attend to the full context, enabling the model to derive answers through direct lookup while generating plausible-sounding but post-hoc justifications. We introduce CausalCoT, an inference framework that enforces causal transparency by decomposing problems into a directed acyclic graph of atomic sub-questions, evaluating each node in an isolated context containing only its direct causal parents. This Markovian structure removes attention pathways to non-parent content, making downstream predictions sensitive to local reasoning rather than global context leakage. Across a diverse suite of reasoning benchmarks, CausalCoT preserves competitive predictive performance while improving explanation faithfulness, increasing causal sensitivity of intermediate reasoning steps by an average of 12 and up to 21 percentage points over the strongest baseline. The structured dependency graph additionally enables test-time interventions in which local corrections propagate predictably through downstream reasoning.

Thu 22 OctMachine LearningArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Chain-of-thought prompting helps language models explain how they reach answers step-by-step, but those steps don’t always actually cause the answer. The authors introduce CausalCoT, which breaks problems into small questions linked like a flowchart and solves each with only the information that directly influences it. This stops the model from shortcutting and making explanations that just sound plausible. Their approach keeps accuracy high while making the reasoning steps much more honest and lets users fix parts and see how corrections flow through the rest.
Open → 2610.31639v1

AutoAdapt enables efficient domain updates with modular adapters

AutoAdapt: Automatic Domain Discovery Enables Low-Cost Extensibility

Abstract: Instruction-tuned models are deployed into environments where domains are heterogeneous and evolve, yet adding new domains or data typically requires costly retraining. We present AutoAdapt, a modular framework that incorporates new domains and data via targeted single-adapter training without modifying other adapters. The framework automatically discovers latent domains, uses them to train per-domain Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) adapters independently in parallel and performs parameter-free routing. Across 14 domain-specific benchmarks and GPT-4o pairwise judgements, AutoAdapt achieves parity with a LoRA adapter trained on all domains without requiring full-model retraining. We also find evidence of specialisation effect convergence across independent discovery methods. Overall, training each adapter on its own domain prevents domain interference by construction, thus enabling modular, taxonomy-free domain specialisation without aggregate performance loss or full model retraining.

Wed 7 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Instruction-tuned AI models often work with many different types of tasks or topics, which can change over time. The paper presents AutoAdapt, a way to add new topics or domains without retraining the entire model by training small separate modules called adapters. AutoAdapt figures out hidden domains on its own and trains these adapters independently, so they don’t interfere with each other. This approach matches the performance of training one big adapter for all domains, but is more flexible and cheaper to update.
Open → 2610.10349v1