Papers for

machine learning system integrators

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Wave-based neural operators can have larger errors than random tests show

Targeted search shows that random-device testing underestimates worst-case error in a simulated wave-based neural operator

Abstract: Wave-based processors promise fast, energy-efficient Fourier layers for neural operators. They are usually validated on randomly sampled devices, but using them requires knowing how large their error can become under fabrication and alignment variation. In a stylised numerical case study, a hybrid Fourier neural operator runs its four spectral layers on simulated coherent 4f processors with 32 toleranced knobs, whose half-widths are representative rather than calibrated. For 120 models (four tasks, six training methods, five seeds), we compared the worst of N random in-spec devices with a searched one. On a deterministic simulator with one frozen draw of the random static errors, the searched device's held-out error was 1.08-3.10 times the maximum over 200 Monte Carlo devices and 1.06-2.71 times that over 1000. With 20 fresh static draws, it still exceeded the maximum over 200 random devices in 116 of 120 models. Under uniform sampling, the probability of drawing such a device is at most 0.37% per model (two-sided 95% Clopper-Pearson), which says nothing about how large its error is. The gap persisted with uniform or Sobol' sampling at the search's budget, shared knobs, a second crosstalk model, box scales of 0.25-2 and a pixel-level device model. Models trained only with random static errors reached 3.7-39.9 times their nominal error on searched devices, and fine-tuning on random and gradient-searched devices gave the lowest searched error of the six in all 20 task-seed pairs. For two heat-exchanger quantities, a search targeted at each exceeded the worst of 1000 random devices in all 39 models, and hence the Wilks 95/95 limit (worst of 59). For the mean pressure of 11 models, no random device exceeded a 1% error threshold, but the searched device did. Random testing estimates how often errors exceed a threshold; worst-device search gives a lower bound on how large they can be.

Mon 5 OctMachine LearningEmerging Technologies
The gist
Wave-based processors help run certain neural networks faster and use less energy. Usually, people test these devices by randomly sampling how much their manufacturing errors affect them, but this method might miss the worst-case errors. The authors show with simulations that searching directly for the worst-case device reveals much larger errors than random testing finds. This means to understand risks well, you need targeted searches, not just random checks.
Open → 2610.07529v1

Vision language models adapt faster using position aware layer queries

Position Aware Layer Queries for Test Time Training in Vision Language Models

Abstract: Test-Time Training (TTT) adapts models to incoming test samples (e.g. out-of-distribution, (OOD)) when conventional fine-tuning is infeasible. Existing TTT methods for Vision-Language Models (VLMs) create supervision from several augmented views, each requiring forward (and often backward) passes through the entire VLM, incurring substantial computational cost. We observe that one forward pass with all the intermediate layer outputs already yields far more signal than the final embedding from all augmentations. We introduce Layer Query Network (LQN), a lightweight approach that can adapt a frozen VLM (teacher) in a single forward pass of the VLM via a small model (student). LQN uses Position-Aware Distillation (PAD) to mimic the teacher VLM's intermediate-layer spatial tokens by querying spatial coordinates of intermediate tokens. LQN additionally relies on Location Consistency Regularization (LCR), a self-supervision technique, replacing expensive O(H x W) image augmentation with O(1) coordinate sampling. Integrating these, LQN i) adapts and improves zero-shot CLIP ViT-B/16 by 9.8% Top-1 on OOD ImageNet, ii) outperforms the previous best GS-Bias on fine-grained classification by 3.9% Top-1, iii) achieves faster convergence than TPS for CLIP ResNet-50 (47 mins vs 55 mins), iv) generalizes adaptation to VLMs like SigLIP, EVA-CLIP, and CoCa, and lightweight students like MLP, ResNet, VGG, and v) extends to panoptic, instance, and semantic segmentation.

Sun 27 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Models that understand images and language sometimes struggle with unexpected or new types of images. The authors found a way to help these models adjust quickly at test time, using fewer computer resources. They do this by teaching a small network to learn important details inside the bigger model in just one pass, instead of many. This method improves accuracy on harder-to-classify images and works well on several types of vision and language models.
Open → 2609.34021v1

Analog compute in memory improves accuracy despite noise

NOVA-CIM: Noise- and Correlation-Tolerant Stochastic Interfaces for Analog Compute-in-Memory

Abstract: Analog compute-in-memory (CIM) enables energy-efficient model acceleration, but its reliance on ADC-based readout, which directly quantizes noisy column currents, makes inference accuracy highly sensitive to analog read noise, active-row scaling, and ADC precision. In this paper, we present NOVA-CIM, a noise- and correlation-tolerant stochastic interface for analog CIM by replacing multi-bit ADC readout with random-reference 1-bit sensing and reconstructing results through lightweight counting. By converting column currents into comparison probabilities, this probability-domain readout averages zero-mean dynamic read noise over stochastic samples while reducing dependence on high-resolution ADCs. We provide a unified robustness analysis showing that dynamic read noise is suppressed through temporal averaging and that spatial input-bitstream correlation increases instantaneous current variance rather than introducing first-order MAC bias. MAC-level experiments and end-to-end evaluation on ViT-Base validate the analysis: under read noise, Top-1 accuracy remains 84.48% near the 84.51% bfloat16 (BF16) baseline; under stochastic number generator (SNG) reuse, MAC bias stays near zero while root-mean-square error (RMSE) and stochastic cross-correlation (SCC) grow as predicted.

Mon 7 SeptHardware Architecture
The gist
Analog compute-in-memory (CIM) chips speed up calculations but often suffer from noisy readouts that hurt accuracy. The authors developed a new way called NOVA-CIM to read these noisy signals by converting them into simple yes-or-no comparisons many times and then averaging results, which reduces the effect of noise. Their method avoids the need for complex and precise converters, keeping accuracy high even with noisy signals. Tests on vision transformer models showed almost no loss in accuracy compared to traditional digital methods.
Open → 2609.07059v1