Papers for

machine learning operations teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Decoder cosine similarity struggles to predict model feature interactions

Where Decoder Cosine Similarity Fails for SAE Feature Flow Discovery

Abstract: Foundation models are increasingly adapted through fine-tuning, model editing, and alignment procedures while retaining previously acquired capabilities. Understanding the internal computations that support these adaptations is therefore becoming increasingly important for continual model evolution. Sparse autoencoders (SAEs) provide interpretable feature dictionaries for residual-stream activations and sublayer outputs, but it remains unclear how state features and update features interact to produce downstream residual features. In this work, we focus on MLP updates as a first test case. We construct a transition atlas of triples $s_k + u_j \rightarrow t_\ell$, where a residual-state feature and an MLP-update feature jointly predict a target residual feature, and validate candidate triples by ablating the decoded update feature. In a 20M-token Pythia-160M $L_7 \rightarrow L_8$ run, we find 38,125 strong ablation-effect transitions, but 88.0% have both state-target and update-target decoder cosine similarity below 0.7. As a preliminary cross-model check, a run of 20M-token Gemma-3-4B $L_{21} \rightarrow L_{22}$ causally validates only the top 30,000 ranked candidate triples by ablating the decoded update feature, and 53.6% of strong-effect triples have both state-target and update-target decoder cosine similarity below 0.7. The Gemma result is directionally consistent with Pythia, but weaker, since update-target cosine recovers many of the strongest Gemma effects and the run is not a full-atlas causal validation. Ultimately, our results suggest that feature flow atlases can serve as diagnostics of representation-update mechanisms and thereby inform tools for steering model updates. Future work will validate more complex patterns across layers, models, and SAE families.

Fri 11 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
The paper looks at how parts of large AI models work together when they learn new things but keep old knowledge. The authors study small building blocks inside these models called sparse autoencoders and how they predict changes in the model’s internal signals. They find that a common technique called decoder cosine similarity often fails to spot important interactions between features that help the model update itself. This suggests that new tools are needed to better understand and guide how AI models change and learn over time.
Open 2609.12591v1

Layer selective unlearning improves privacy and robustness in large language models

Forgetting Only What Matters: Layer-Selective Unlearning toward Robust LLMs

Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) can memorize and reproduce sensitive, copyrighted, or otherwise undesirable training content, creating privacy, safety, and regulatory concerns. Machine unlearning offers a practical alternative to full retraining, but many existing methods apply broad or fixed parameter updates that can degrade utility and remain brittle under deployment changes such as post-training quantization, where forgotten knowledge may partially re-emerge. We propose Forgetting Only What Matters via Unlearning Layers (FOM-UL), a layer-level unlearning framework that selects transformer layers using a forget-to-retain significance score. This score identifies layers with high influence on the forget set and low sensitivity to the retain set, allowing FOM-UL to concentrate updates where they are most effective while leaving most of the model unchanged. This targeted update strategy improves the forgetting-utility trade-off and provides an empirical path toward quantization-resilient unlearning by reducing the chance that small, diffuse updates are erased by low-bit rounding. Across TOFU, KnowUnDo, and MUSE-style evaluations, FOM-UL reduces residual memorization compared with strong GA, NPO, KLD, SURE, ReLearn, and LUNAR-based baselines while preserving retain-set utility close to the vanilla model. Under 8-bit and 4-bit post-training quantization, FOM-UL maintains stronger memorization suppression and utility preservation than competing methods, and adversarial prompt evaluations show lower recovery of forgotten content. Overall, FOM-UL provides an efficient unlearning strategy that improves targeted forgetting, utility preservation, and deployment robustness without claiming formal guarantees of erasure.

Wed 9 SeptMachine LearningArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Large language models sometimes remember sensitive or unwanted information they were trained on, which can cause privacy and safety problems. The authors propose a new way to selectively erase only the important parts of these models that hold this sensitive data, without messing up the parts that are still useful. This method focuses on updating specific layers in the model to forget unwanted content, making the model safer and more reliable even after compressing it for deployment. Their tests show this approach works better than previous methods at forgetting the right information while keeping the model useful.
Open 2609.10439v1