Papers for
machine learning operation teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
LLMs improve themselves continuously by learning from research papers
PAPER2LLM++: Continual Self-Evolution of LLMs from Research Papers
Abstract: Research on LLMs continually uncovers model limitations, their causes, and potential solutions. Yet these human discoveries remain largely disconnected from model evolution: an LLM does not automatically learn from new research about its own failures. We introduce PAPER2LLM++, a framework for continual self-evolution of LLMs from research papers. Rather than treating papers merely as knowledge to retrieve, PAPER2LLM++ uses the growing literature as a stream of evidence and supervision for model improvement. For each incoming paper, it extracts evidence-grounded findings, tests whether the reported limitation persists in the current model, and, when needed, converts the findings into candidate learning signals. A try-evaluate-commit procedure integrates an update only when it improves the targeted behavior without substantially forgetting prior improvements or degrading general capabilities. Across a sequential stream of research-discovered LLM failures, we show that models can progressively incorporate new findings while retaining earlier gains. PAPER2LLM++ thus takes a step toward closing the loop between human discovery and model evolution, enabling models to continually learn from research about their own limitations and improvements.
Ragwarrant controls deployment safety for rag systems under multiple constraints
RAGWarrant: Evidence-Preserving Governance for RAG Policy Promotion Under Quality, Cost, Latency, and Risk Constraints
Abstract: Retrieval-augmented generation systems are extensively instrumented with metrics, benchmarks, traces, and automated judges, but these tools do not decide whether a proposed policy change is safe to release. We present RAGWarrant, an open-source promotion-control framework that treats deployment as a constrained evidence decision rather than a leaderboard choice. RAGWarrant normalizes evaluator outputs and operational telemetry, applies predeclared quality and hard-risk gates, assigns evidence-class claim ceilings, preserves negative outcomes, and emits auditable PROMOTE, BLOCK, REJECT, or INCONCLUSIVE decisions. We evaluate the framework across T2-RAGBench, MultiHop-RAG, CRAG, HotpotQA, synthetic reproduction, and bounded local generative experiments. On HotpotQA, operational savings were blocked because answer quality fell beyond the declared margin. A bounded CRAG study selected a lower-cost quality-tied policy, but related generative gains were unstable and a held-out guardrail failed closed. We claim an auditable promotion-control abstraction, not optimizer superiority, human validation, or production readiness. The tagged artifact reproduces from a fresh clone, runs as a hardened Docker job, accepts external evaluator exports, and verifies artifact integrity.