Papers for
llm training engineers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Adaptive rollout allocation boosts large language model training efficiency
Bayes-Adaptive MDPs for Rollout Allocation to Enhance GRPO Training
Abstract: Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) has demonstrated strong performance in LLM post-training. However, it allocates a uniform rollout budget to every training question, ignoring variations in question difficulty. As a result, highly difficult questions may receive too few rollouts to generate informative positive reward signals, limiting their contribution to training, while moderately difficult questions often receive more rollouts than necessary. In this work, we formulate the problem of difficulty-aware rollout budget allocation to maximize training utility under the same total rollout budget as standard GRPO. We propose AdaRoll-GRPO, which reformulates rollout allocation as a sequential decision-making problem and leverages a Bayes-adaptive Markov decision process (MDP) to learn an adaptive allocation policy. The learned policy is computed offline and applied during GRPO training without introducing additional online optimization overhead. Extensive experiments on multiple reasoning datasets and LLM architectures demonstrate that AdaRoll-GRPO consistently improves GRPO training performance under a fixed rollout budget, highlighting the effectiveness of adaptive rollout allocation for GRPO in LLM post-training.
Llm data selection improves by balancing similarity and diversity
ICLHerd: Herding-Based Data Selection for LLMs with In-Context Learning as a Proxy
Abstract: Data selection plays a central role in modern large language model training, as the quality of training data strongly influences downstream performance. A common approach is to curate a development set that encodes the desired skills (e.g., reasoning or multilinguality) and select data that are similar to them. Existing methods compute similarity using cosine distance over either the model's hidden states or gradients. However, we observe that this max-similarity strategy induces a mode-seeking bias: the selected data clusters tightly around the development samples. To address this, we propose ICLHerd, a data selection framework that leverages the von Mises-Fisher kernel to balance mode-seeking with mode-averaging. We further introduce in-context learning as a validation proxy, enabling efficient hyperparameter search over the balance trade-off. Results show that ICLHerd outperforms existing LLM data selection algorithms, highlighting the importance of balancing mode-seeking and mode-averaging.