Papers for

legal transcription teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Linker improves speaker tracking beyond fixed diarizer limits

Slots Are Not Speakers: Training-Free Speaker Linking for Frozen Streaming Diarizers

Abstract: This paper presents a causal, training-free linker that allows a frozen streaming diarizer to track more speakers than it has output slots. Streaming end-to-end diarizers such as Streaming Sortformer emit a fixed number N of concurrent speaker slots. Above N speakers, they keep detecting speech but reuse slots across people, because N bounds how many speakers the model can express at once, not how many it will meet. The linker uses only the host's slot posteriors and the audio. It keeps the frames where one slot is active, splits each slot where the speaker changes, embeds each piece with an off-the-shelf speaker encoder, and matches it against a bank of speakers seen so far. It only relabels, so missed speech and false alarm are identical to the host's and every gain is a reduction in speaker confusion. On 1418 sessions from eight corpora, it reduces the 4-slot host's DER above its cap from 36.8% to 22.6%, and barely moves it below the cap. The same constants transfer to the host's 8-slot successor and to two streaming EEND hosts from a different model family. On courtroom hearings with up to 23 speakers it reduces cpWER from 82.7% to 24.4%.

Tue 20 OctSoundArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Many voice diarizers can only track a fixed number of speakers at once, which causes confusion when more people talk. The authors created a new way to connect a diarizer’s speaker slots with actual speakers without needing extra training. Their method splits and matches speech segments to known speakers, cutting confusion without affecting detection accuracy. It works well even in challenging scenarios like courtroom hearings with many speakers.
Open → 2610.28053v1

Hybrid retrieval boosts accuracy in analyzing long audio recordings

HARP: Agentic Hybrid Retrieval and Analysis for Long-Form Audio

Abstract: Long-form audio analysis requires systems to localize and integrate evidence distributed across extended recordings. While existing work primarily retrieves semantic content through structured textual representations, many real-world queries depend on acoustic evidence that is better preserved in continuous representations or raw audio. We introduce HARP (Hybrid Audio Retrieval Pipeline), an agentic framework and benchmark for systematically studying retrieval and evidence representations in long-audio analysis. Hybrid retrieval combining keyword and vector search shows the most robust performance. When paired with both metadata and retrieved audio as evidence, average answer accuracy improves by around 10% and rationale accuracy by around 6% over single-modality retrieval and evidence. Fine-grained evaluation shows that answer accuracy alone overestimates system capability and that HARP mostly follows human performance trends across query types. These results highlight the importance of combining structured retrieval with flexible access to audio evidence and evaluating long-audio systems beyond answer accuracy.

Sat 12 SeptSound
The gist
Long audio recordings can be tricky to analyze because important information is spread out and sometimes found in sounds rather than just words. The authors created HARP, a system that combines searching with keywords and sound features to find evidence in audio more effectively. Their system performs better by using both text and audio clues, improving answer accuracy by about 10%. They also show that just looking at right answers isn't enough to judge performance—the reasoning behind answers matters too.
Open → 2609.14116v1