Papers for

learning analytics developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Online learning fragmentation linked to participation and deadlines

Participation-Sensitive Convergence and the Fragment First, Converge Later Pattern in Asynchronous Online Learning: A Topological Analysis Across 22 OULAD Courses

Abstract: Asynchronous online learning offers temporal flexibility at a structural cost: learning communities tend to fragment rather than cohere. $β_0$, the number of disconnected behavioral clusters from Zigzag Persistent Homology, serves as a cohort-level indicator of this structure. Two questions remained unverified at scale: (1) does apparent $β_0$ convergence reflect genuine behavioral alignment or learner dropout? and (2) do assessment deadlines produce reproducible fragmentation-convergence cycles? We address both across all 22 OULAD courses (N > 22,000; 857 week-pairs). Changes in $β_0$ strongly co-vary with active learner changes (pooled r = 0.387; median per-course r_delta = 0.459, 20/22 courses), identifying $β_0$ as a participation-sensitive indicator: $β_0$ and active learner counts co-respond to deadline events rather than one causing the other. Deadlines produced fragmentation in 82.6% of assessments and the full Fragment First, Converge Later (FFCL) cycle in 60.2%. 3-phase analysis confirmed structural fragmentation as the dominant long-term trajectory (90.9% of courses), moderated by curriculum structure. These findings establish $β_0$ as a participation-sensitive structural indicator with direct implications for AI-augmented learning analytics design.

Thu 1 OctComputers and SocietyMachine Learning
The gist
Courses taught online often see groups of learners split up and come back together over time, especially around deadlines. The authors analyzed 22 online courses with over 22,000 students to see if this splitting means learners behave differently or just stop participating. They found that the number of groups changes closely with how many students are active, mainly around assignment deadlines. This shows the splitting is tied to participation and deadlines, not just behavior differences, which can help design smarter learning tools.
Open → 2610.01738v1