Papers for

large language model developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Cachelink improves cross-model key value cache transfer without reloading

CacheLink: Functional KV Transport for Zero-Prefill Cross-Model Context Handoff

Abstract: KV caches make long-context serving efficient by reusing past computation, but model switching breaks this reuse and forces the receiver to prefill the context again. We study \emph{zero-prefill cross-model context handoff}: translating a sender cache into a receiver-compatible state so that the receiver can continue directly without prefilling same context. Existing affine transport methods show that receiver KV states can be substantially reconstructed from sender caches. However, through extensive analyses, we find that reconstruction fidelity is a poor proxy for receiver utility. Similar K/V reconstruction errors can lead to substantially different attention patterns, predictive distributions, and downstream accuracy, because conventional reconstruction objectives overlook the query-dependent functional importance of K and V in receiver attention. We thus introduce CACHELINK, which learns a coupled K/V correction through the receiver behavior directly. Across four independently trained sender--receiver pairs and seven evaluation panels, CACHELINK improves the equal-weight mean over all methods for every pair. In matched diagnostics, CACHELINK changes K/V squared error by less than 0.4% while substantially changing receiver attention and next-token behavior. At 32K context, it reduces handoff latency by up to $7.27\times$ relative to receiver re-prefill. Our findings verify that reconstruction fidelity alone is insufficient and that preserving the receiver computation induced by the transported cache is important for effective cross-model KV transport.

Sun 11 OctMachine LearningArtificial Intelligence
The gist
When large AI models switch during a conversation, they usually need to reload all the context, which takes time. The authors look at how to transfer cached information smoothly between models without reloading the context. They found that just trying to copy the cached data accurately isn't enough, because the way the receiving model uses this data can vary a lot. They propose Cachelink, which learns to adjust the cached information based on how the receiving model behaves, making context handoff faster and more effective.
Open → 2610.15509v1

Agentic llms decide tool calls using a suppression-shaped vector

How Do Agentic LLMs Decide to Call Tools? A Tool-Call Vector Shaped by Suppression

Abstract: Tool calling, invoking external tools on demand, is central to agentic LLMs, yet the mechanism that decides whether a model calls a tool or responds directly remains poorly understood. Agentic prompts are long and heavily scaffolded, combining role instructions, tool schemas, format templates, and the user's request across hundreds of tokens, creating a noisy, highly entangled context in which no single controllable variable for mechanistic analysis is obvious. To obtain such a variable, we propose a method that converts complex agentic prompts into minimal contrastive pairs in which a single request verb determines the tool-call decision: replacing an execution-verb (e.g., \textit{write}) with an analysis-verb (e.g., \textit{discuss}) reliably flips the decision, suggesting it is mediated by a compact internal state. We construct 500 such paired prompts across Python, Java, and C++ (300 for mechanistic analysis, 200 held out for evaluation). We trace the decision to a vector, $μ_Δ$, that is both causally necessary and sufficient and generalizes beyond the discovery prompts to native multi-turn $τ^2$-Bench trajectories and verb-free requests. Behavioral ablations show that the scaffold establishes a tool-call prior; Transcoder decomposition then reveals that analysis verbs suppress this prior through features signaling that tool use is unnecessary, whereas execution verbs largely leave it intact. Downstream scaffold-reading attention heads and MLP features read out the resulting state, and the same mechanism recurs across seven models from the Qwen, Mistral, and Granite families. Our code is available at https://github.com/XijieGo/MI4ToolCalling.

Wed 7 OctArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Sometimes large language models (LLMs) need to call external tools to help answer a request, but it wasn’t clear how they decide when to do this. The authors found that changing a single word in the prompt, like swapping “write” for “discuss,” can flip this decision. This suggests the model relies on an internal signal—a special vector—that controls whether a tool is called. They confirmed this mechanism works across different prompts, programming languages, and several model families. Essentially, certain words in the prompt suppress or allow the model’s ‘urge’ to use a tool.
Open → 2610.09624v1

Financial fraud detection improved with behavior grounded semantic enrichment

Behavior-Grounded Semantic Enrichment for Financial Fraud Modeling and Reasoning

Abstract: In financial fraud detection, rich semantic context can provide important evidence for transaction behavior modeling and fraud reasoning. However, public real-world financial datasets often lack rich semantics due to privacy constraints. Consequently, synthetic datasets incorporate generated semantics, but at the cost of behavioral realism; textual descriptions for contextual reasoning remain scarce. We address this gap through a semantic enrichment framework grounded in original transaction behavior to simulate multimodal financial data. We (1) propose a multi-agent semantic enrichment framework that generates interpretable financial semantics grounded in transaction behavior through role-specialized agents and consistency refinement, and (2) newly contribute a valuable multimodal financial fraud dataset, MS-FFSD, enriched with structured semantics and textual semantics while preserving real-data-grounded transaction behavior. Furthermore, we systematically analyze the quality and utility of semantic enrichment. Results demonstrate statistical fidelity and framework generalizability, while showing that richer semantics benefit fraud modeling and context-aware LLM reasoning. Overall, this work advances multimodal financial fraud research and bridges emerging LLM and multi-agent capabilities with operational anti-fraud practice. The framework and dataset are released at https://github.com/AI4Risk/MS-FFSD.

Mon 28 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Financial fraud detection often struggles because available datasets lack detailed context about transactions, partly due to privacy issues. The authors developed a way to enrich financial data with meaningful descriptions based on actual transaction behavior using specialized agents. This approach creates a new multimodal dataset with both structured and textual information that better reflects real transaction patterns. They show that adding this semantic context helps improve fraud detection and reasoning with large language models.
Open → 2609.34211v1