Papers for

language technology developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Sanskrit uses more tokens than English per proposition under current tokenizers

Fewer Words, Not Fewer Tokens: Measuring the Sanskrit Tokenization Penalty per Proposition

Abstract: Sanskrit fuses case, number, person and tense into word endings and chains clauses into compounds, so it is information-dense per word. Whether that density survives subword tokenization is a separate question, to be asked per unit of meaning rather than per word. On identical FLORES-200 devtest content, Sanskrit costs 1.774-2.187 times the English tokens under deployed tokenizers with vocabularies of 200,019 ids or more, but only 1.325-1.353 times the Hindi tokens. Against a deployed English tokenizer, Sanskrit-trained BPE arms then look cheaper per proposition than English on contemporary prose (0.887). Against a matched English control, the same algorithm and vocabulary trained on the English side of the same corpus, that flip disappears: at 32,000 and 64,000 pieces all 8 matched pairs, each size-matched arm against both a pair-matched and a byte-matched control, sit above 1.0 on prose with 95% intervals excluding it. The gap closes as the vocabulary grows: at 128,000 pieces the BPE pair reads 0.983 in domain while staying above parity out of domain (1.025) and on FLORES (1.116). The ratio factorises into a character-length ratio and a tokens-per-character ratio, the second near 1 throughout: what survives matched tokenization is character-level length, which Sanskrit prose lacks over English in SLP1 (1.028) and Sanskrit verse has (0.596). The robust statement is about deployed practice: on contemporary prose and on FLORES, with the Sanskrit side in SLP1 against the deployed o200k English pivot, Sanskrit costs 1.831-2.899 English tokens per proposition under the tokenizers people actually ship. Code, the results snapshot and every table here are public.

Fri 11 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Sanskrit packs a lot of meaning into each word, so you might expect it to need fewer tokens when split up by computer programs. But the authors show that under commonly used tokenizers, Sanskrit actually needs about 1.8 to 2.9 times more English tokens for the same meaning in prose. This is mostly because Sanskrit has longer character strings rather than more tokens per character. The study also compares Sanskrit to Hindi and shows Sanskrit's tokenization cost is higher than Hindi’s, providing insights into language processing tools for Sanskrit.
Open 2609.12960v1

Combining synthetic and real data improves Manchu OCR accuracy

Combining Synthetic and Real Data for Low-Resource Historical OCR: A Manchu Case Study

Abstract: Manchu, now critically endangered, was one of the principal languages of the Qing empire (1636-1912), and its extensive archival record is increasingly digitized but remains difficult to search and analyze at scale. Previous work showed that vision-language models (VLMs) trained only on synthetic Manchu word images can reach 87.4% word accuracy on real Qing manuscripts and prints, leaving a substantial synthetic-to-real gap. This study examines how synthetic and real historical training data should be combined for low-resource OCR. Using 60,000 synthetic and 20,306 real historical word images, we evaluate three pretrained VLMs and a compact convolutional recurrent neural network (CRNN) under four regimes: synthetic-only, real-only, joint synthetic-real, and sequential synthetic-to-real training, following a common checkpoint-selection and archival evaluation protocol. Introducing real training images raises the leading configurations to between 95.09% and 96.28% word accuracy, while no synthetic-only configuration exceeds 87.92%. Synthetic supplementation substantially improves all three VLMs, whereas its marginal effect for the CRNN is sensitive to the training objective. Joint and sequential training yield broadly similar archival accuracy under the tested practical pipelines. A compact CRNN also reaches the leading performance range once real images are available, showing that model scale alone does not determine recognition accuracy. Finally, complementary errors among strong recognizers allow voting to raise accuracy to 98.27% without additional training, while an eighteenth-century Manchu dictionary provides a principled rule for adjudicating disagreements.

Thu 10 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Manchu is an endangered language with many historical documents that are hard to read by computers. This study found that using a mix of fake (synthetic) images and real historical images helps computer programs read Manchu text much better. The best models reached over 96% accuracy, and combining multiple models improved accuracy even further. This approach can help make old Manchu texts easier to search and study.
Open 2609.11495v1

Larger context windows help correct grammar with fewer errors

Larger Context Window, Fewer Overcorrections: Optimizing Prompts and Batching for Minimal-Edit Grammatical Error Correction

Abstract: Minimal-edit Grammatical Error Correction (GEC) is a challenging task for zero- and few-shot prompted Large Language Models (LLMs), which systematically overcorrect and degrade $F_{0.5}$ by rewriting well-formed spans. While fine-tuning provides an effective solution, it imposes substantial infrastructure demands. We introduce a prompt-based approach that closes the gap to fine-tuned models through three advances in GEC prompting methodology. First, we introduce taxonomy-based instructions to enforce minimal-edit constraints with a comprehensive list of grammatical error rules, equipping the LLM with a bounded, metric-aligned scope of correctable edits, which benefits the strongest models while remaining model-dependent overall. Second, we show that batching multiple uncorrected sentences into a single input context acts as a targeted regularizer against overcorrection, systematically reducing the edit rate across diverse LLM families; we hypothesize this arises from attention dilution effect induced by the bounded capacity of self-attention scores. Finally, LLM-assisted Prompt Optimization refines these instructions. Powered by Gemini 3.1-Pro, our prompt achieves $F_{0.5}=78.32$ on the BEA-2019 test set - establishing a new prompt-based SOTA while shrinking the gap to the fine-tuned single-model SOTA (Staruch et al., 2025) to a mere $0.38$ points. Code, prompts, and outputs are publicly available.

Wed 9 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Correcting grammar mistakes automatically can sometimes make too many unnecessary changes to sentences that are already correct. The authors show how giving language models more sentences to look at together helps them avoid overcorrecting. They also created special instructions that tell the model exactly which grammar mistakes to fix. Combining these ideas, their method nearly matches the accuracy of fully trained models without needing extra training.
Open 2609.10810v1

Rosetta system improves English to dialectal Arabic dialogue translation

Rosetta at AlexandriaX-2026: LoRA-Adapted NileChat for Context-Aware Dialectal Arabic Dialogue Translation

Abstract: This paper describes the Rosetta system for Subtask 1 (Context-Aware English-to-Dialectal Arabic Dialogue Translation) of the AlexandriaX shared task, participating in both constrained and unconstrained tracks. The approach fine-tunes a LoRA adapter on NileChat-3B using structured system/user prompts that condition generation on dialect and dialogue context. For the unconstrained track, the adapter is additionally pretrained on MADAR and PADIC. Rosetta ranked 4th in the constrained track (spBLEU 26.10) and 5th in the unconstrained track (spBLEU 25.09). The experimental results demonstrate that external pretraining helps only two of thirteen dialects while slightly hurting overall performance, suggesting negative transfer.

Wed 9 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Translating English conversations into Arabic dialects is tricky because each dialect can be very different. The authors created Rosetta, a system that fine-tunes a small, adaptable model called LoRA on an existing chat model to handle these dialects better by using context from the conversation. They also experimented with additional training on other dialect datasets. Their system performed well, placing near the top in a competition, but found that extra training sometimes hurt overall accuracy, showing the challenge of mixing dialects.
Open 2609.10395v1

Korean speech error correction improves call center transcript accuracy

Leveraging Fine-grained Error Correction in Korean Speech Recognition for Consultation Services

Abstract: Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) technology is fundamental to customer service automation and large-scale transcription. However, even advanced ASR models exhibit inevitable errors in complex real-world environments such as call center conversations. When privacy restrictions preclude audio access, error correction must rely on text-based post-editing. Existing text-only approaches face significant challenges in low-resource languages, mainly due to a critical scarcity of annotated corpora and tailored correction methodologies. For Korean, this resource gap is particularly pronounced, as existing resources are predominantly designed for ASR training rather than text-based error correction. To address this, we introduce DasanCallDial, the first large-scale Korean benchmark dataset specifically curated for dialogue-level ASR error correction. Derived from genuine call center interactions, it comprises 1,974 dialogues with 115,460 utterances. Leveraging this resource, we propose Detector-Gated Contextual Span Correction (DCSC), a text-only post-editing framework for error-sparse Korean speech recognition transcripts. DCSC combines an encoder-based detector that first performs token-level error detection, followed by a language model-based corrector trained to rectify fine-grained span-level errors. Additionally, we employ dialogue-level context augmentation to enable the model to leverage discourse history for disambiguation. By employing multi-level granularity, our method achieves state-of-the-art performance, effectively overcoming the limitations of general LLMs in low-resource settings.

Wed 9 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Accurate transcripts from speech recognition are hard to get, especially for languages like Korean with few resources. The authors created a large dataset from real call center conversations to help fix errors in these transcripts using just text. They designed a new method that first finds mistakes word by word, then carefully corrects the errors by looking at the surrounding conversation. Their approach works better than general language models, helping make automatic Korean call transcripts more reliable without needing the original audio.
Open 2609.09889v1

Structural caregiver feedback best supports grammar learning in child models

Which Forms of Caregiver Feedback Support Grammar Learning? A Reinforcement-Learning Study of Child-Like Language Models

Abstract: Social interaction is central to children's language learning, but the effects of different forms of caregiver feedback are difficult to isolate in naturalistic data. We use child-like language models as controlled learners to test which forms of feedback support grammatical development. Small GPT-2-style models are pretrained on child-directed language from CHILDES, then fine-tuned with reinforcement learning using reward models trained to capture four feedback types: communicative feedback, structural alignment, semantic contingency, and affective feedback. Reward fine-tuning yields limited gains on minimal-pair evaluations, but clearer effects in free generation. Structural alignment produces the strongest improvements in grammaticality, providing a novel, plausible mechanistic account of how this feedback can support grammar learning. Communicative feedback yields more moderate gains. In contrast, semantic contingency and affective feedback do not improve grammaticality, although further analyses suggest that they may support other aspects of language learning beyond grammar. These results suggest that different forms of caregiver feedback make complementary contributions to language learning.

Tue 8 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Children learn language through social interactions with caregivers, but it’s hard to tell exactly which types of feedback help most. The authors used small language models trained to act like children and tested different kinds of caregiver feedback. They found that feedback helping the child notice structural patterns in language most improved grammar, while other feedback types like emotional cues did not improve grammar but could help other language skills. This suggests that different feedback types each play unique roles in language learning.
Open 2609.08576v1

LLM agents help analyze language structures faster and more widely

LLM Agents as Computational Typologists

Abstract: Linguistic typology relies on expert analysis of reference grammars across languages, making large-scale crosslinguistic comparison labor-intensive and unscalable. We introduce AUTOTYPOLOGIST, an LLM agent for evidence-grounded typological analysis over reference grammars. The agent is capable of retrieving relevant grammar sections, analyzing interlinear glossed text (IGT), and iteratively reasoning over typological hypotheses using a ReAct-style workflow. We evaluate the system on TYPOLOGICAL FEATURE CODING against expert annotations and TYPOLOGICAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING with typological universals using 25 open-source reference grammars. Operating under different information constraints in TYPOLOGICAL FEATURE CODING, the agent can synthesize information from reference grammar prose but still faces challenges with only IGTs in the target language. In TYPOLOGICAL HYPOTHESIS TESTING, the agent can synthesize crosslinguistic evidence and identify both supporting cases and counterexamples. These findings suggest that LLM agents can support scalable and inspectable typological analysis, while still requiring expert validation.

Mon 7 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Studying how languages differ is hard and takes a lot of expert work. The authors created AUTOTYPOLOGIST, a language model agent that can read grammar books and examples to find patterns in many languages. It checks facts carefully and uses step-by-step reasoning to understand complex language features. While it does well when it has full grammar texts, it struggles with just raw language examples and still needs experts to double-check its findings.
Open 2609.07791v1

European Portuguese web corpus expands with refined filtering methods

Fine PT-PT Web: A High-Quality 41 Billion Tokens Data Collection of the European Portuguese Web

Abstract: Curating Web corpora for regional language variants like European Portuguese (PT-PT) is heavily bottlenecked by dialectal overlap (mainly with PT-BR) and data processing scale. This paper presents an efficient pipeline to curate a production-ready PT-PT corpus from the Portuguese Web, spanning 411 TB of raw data from Arquivo.pt. We introduce a novel post-scraping block that removes boilerplate and line duplicates prior to filtering. This early-stage intervention increases final document yield by 19.04% by rescuing valid text that standard heuristic filters prematurely discard. Integrated with rigorous language identification, weighted fuzzy deduplication, and neural quality classification, our pipeline offers a scalable framework and a clean, representative corpus optimized for LLM pre-training.

Mon 7 SeptComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Collecting online text for specific language versions like European Portuguese is tough because it can get mixed up with Brazilian Portuguese and involves huge amounts of data. The authors created a smart process that cleans and sorts web data early to save more good content that usually gets thrown away. Their method also uses careful language checks, fuzzy duplicate removal, and AI-based quality checks to produce a clean and useful text collection. This collection can help train large language AI models specifically for European Portuguese.
Open 2609.07699v1