Papers for

language technology companies

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Irish text-to-speech improved using pronunciation guides and small data

Pronunciation-Supervised Text-to-Speech for Irish (Gaeilge)

Abstract: Speech technology for Irish must be built from very little transcribed speech, yet the language's pronunciation is thoroughly documented in dictionaries and dialect descriptions. We ask whether that documentation can supervise the adaptation of a large pretrained text-to-speech model to a language it was never trained on. We adapt Qwen3-TTS to Irish using 12.8 hours of crowdsourced Common Voice speech, correcting two defects in the vendor fine-tuning script that training loss does not reveal (Appendix A), and reach character error rate (CER) 0.225 on held-out cross-corpus text, against 0.397 for an exhaustively tuned from-scratch system and 0.437 for zero-shot cloning. We then compile the Wiktionary pronunciation record into a lexicon and a phoneme critic, and use that critic as the verifier in one round of rejection fine-tuning: CER 0.159 cross-corpus and 0.067 in-domain, with the voice still anonymous across all 202 training speakers. The same critic explains why the voice cannot yet be steered to a minority dialect: 229 of 12,311 training clips lean Ulster against 8,451 Munster. Pronunciation documentation, converted into a verifier, is a practical lever for low-resource speech synthesis, and a way to measure what the available data cannot support.

Wed 28 OctComputation and Language
The gist
Making computers speak Irish well is hard because there is little recorded speech for training. The authors show it helps to use written pronunciation guides from dictionaries to teach a powerful speech model how to pronounce Irish words. They fine-tuned a large pre-existing model with a small amount of Irish speech and improved accuracy by checking pronunciations against dictionary rules. This approach also measures where spoken data is missing, like rare dialects.
Open → 2610.38384v1

Code-switched training improves domain reasoning in target languages

From Unverifiable Domain Text to Cross-Lingual RLVR via Code-Switched Task Synthesis

Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) can improve reasoning in large language models, but specialized non-English domains expose a data mismatch. Raw English domain text is often available, while target-language RLVR tasks with verifiable rewards are scarce. We introduce code-switched task synthesis for cross-lingual RLVR, a data-centric approach that derives target-language and code-switched RLVR task variants from otherwise unverifiable English domain text. Using fill-in-the-middle multiple-choice QA as a seed task format, we synthesize automatically verifiable tasks from domain passages and reshape them into cross-lingual variants. These variants preserve the same evidence-answer relation but change how English and target-language evidence are presented during RLVR. On Korean medical benchmarks and cybersecurity benchmarks across four target languages, code-switched training outperforms matched monolingual and bilingual-mixture baselines on average target-language performance while maintaining comparable English performance. Additional analyses provide evidence of better target-language input understanding and stronger cross-lingual alignment in both model outputs and internal representations. These results suggest that code-switched training helps target-language inputs access domain reasoning learned more strongly in English.

Sun 18 OctComputation and Language
The gist
Understanding specialized information like medical or cybersecurity knowledge can be hard for AI models in languages other than English, due to lack of good training tasks. The authors introduce a method that creates language-learning tasks mixing English and a target language by transforming English texts into verifiable questions and answers. Training models with these mixed-language tasks helps them better understand and reason in the target language while keeping good performance in English. This approach was tested on Korean, medical, and cybersecurity text across multiple languages, showing improved results compared to just using single or bilingual data.
Open → 2610.25399v1

Japanese large language models prioritize transparency and usability

LLM-jp-4 Technical Report

Abstract: This paper presents LLM-jp-4, a family of Japanese sovereign large language models (LLMs) developed with an emphasis on transparency, reproducibility, and practical usability. LLM-jp-4 comprises an 8B dense model and a 32B-A3B mixture-of-experts model, both trained from scratch on approximately 12 trillion tokens. To support independent verification and reproduction, we establish explicit criteria for selecting training data, external models, and software, and make the development process publicly available. Evaluation results demonstrate substantial improvements over previous LLM-jp models and competitive performance against open-weight models of similar scale. By documenting the development principles, training procedures, and empirical findings of LLM-jp-4, we aim to provide a reference for future sovereign AI development.

Wed 14 OctComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
This paper introduces LLM-jp-4, a set of large language models designed specifically for the Japanese language. The models are made with a focus on being open and reproducible, using a huge amount of training text to improve performance. The team shares clear steps on how they chose data and software, helping others verify and build on their work. Their new models perform better than earlier versions and as well as similar open models.
Open → 2610.19331v1

Benchmark dataset enables Bangla multilingual task dialogue understanding

A Benchmark for Bangla Task-Oriented Dialogue Understanding

Abstract: Task-oriented dialogue understanding remains underexplored for Bangla, particularly in multilingual settings involving English and romanized Bangla (Banglish). We introduce BanglaTOD, a parallel tri-lingual benchmark comprising 209 multi-turn dialogues across nine Bangladesh-specific service domains and 64 intents. Each conversational turn is aligned across Bangla, English, and Banglish, yielding 4,689 language-specific turn records annotated with intents, token-level slots, state updates, and accumulated dialogue states. We establish context-aware baselines for joint intent classification and slot filling using mBERT, BERT-base-uncased, and BanglaBERT. Cross-language analysis reveals substantial performance differences across models and linguistic representations, while removing dialogue history reduces intent accuracy by 19.0--25.7 percentage points. BanglaTOD provides a foundation for multilingual dialogue understanding and future dialogue state tracking research in Bangladesh-specific conversational applications. The dataset is publicly available at \href{https://huggingface.co/datasets/afri7here/BanglaTOD}{Hugging Face}.

Tue 13 OctComputation and Language
The gist
Bangla task-based conversations with mixed English and romanized Bangla are not well studied yet. The authors created BanglaTOD, a dataset with dialogues in Bangla, English, and Banglish (romanized Bangla), covering nine common services and many user intentions. They tested language models to see how well they understand and track conversations in these languages, finding that prior dialogue history is very important for accuracy. This dataset helps build better chat systems for Bangla-speaking users in Bangladesh.
Open → 2610.18060v1

Yorùbá speech corpus text with 24,905 verified sentences released

The ÌròyìnSpeech Text Corpus: 24,905 Curated Yorùbá Sentences for Speech and Language Technology

Abstract: ÌròyìnSpeech is a 42-hour, 80-speaker Yorùbá read-speech corpus whose audio has been distributed by ELRA since 2024. This paper describes the release of its text component: 24,905 unique, hand-verified, tone-marked Yorùbá sentences (275,897 tokens; 15,687 types), curated in 2022 as recording prompts. Roughly 11,000 sentences were adapted from openly licensed news material; the remainder were written in-house to broaden coverage beyond the religious translation that dominates existing Yorùbá corpora. Every sentence was checked by hand for tone-mark accuracy, edited for read-aloud clarity and a neutral register, and localised so that non-Yorùbá personal and place names appear in Yorùbá form. Preparing the text for release surfaced systematic Unicode normalisation failures affecting more than 60% of lines (with precomposed and decomposed forms of the same letter co-occurring within single sentences) which we document and correct. The corpus supports diacritic restoration, grapheme-to-phoneme conversion, TTS front-end development and orthographic research, and serves as a validated prompt set for new recording.

Sun 4 OctComputation and Language
The gist
It is hard to build speech and language tools for Yorùbá because there are not many accurate texts and recordings. The authors created a collection of 24,905 Yorùbá sentences that are carefully checked for correct tones and easy to speak aloud. These sentences come from news and original writing, covering more topics than past collections. They also fixed text encoding problems that cause errors in Yorùbá letters. This collection can help build technologies like text-to-speech and language analysis for Yorùbá.
Open → 2610.05366v1

Sinhala language tool improves word splitting with neural network

A Character-Level Neural Approach to Sinhala Sandhi Splitting

Abstract: Sinhala Sandhi splitting recovers the constituent words or morphemes hidden inside a phonologically merged surface form. The task is important for Sinhala NLP because Sandhi obscures lexical boundaries, but no prior published work has established a neural benchmark for Sinhala Sandhi splitting. We present a character-level sequence-to-sequence study based on SandhiLex, using native Sinhala Unicode input and evaluating recurrent encoder-decoder models for affixational and more complex lexicalized, derivational, and etymological Sandhi. The central challenge is the hard subset lexicalized, derivational, and etymological Sandhi, where our best model, a bidirectional LSTM encoder with a unidirectional LSTM decoder, reaches only 68.40\% exact-match accuracy (82.08\% character-level accuracy), well below the 94.00\% achieved on the more regular affixational subset. Ablations show that bidirectional encoding is the largest contributor to performance, while native Sinhala script improves exact match accuracy over romanized input. Qualitative analysis indicates that many errors are near misses involving boundary adjacent characters or plausible but incorrect phonological substitutions. These results establish an empirical baseline for Sinhala Sandhi splitting and identify data scale, Sandhi type conditioning, and attention-based decoding as the main directions for future work.

Mon 28 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Sinhala language has a feature called Sandhi that merges words together, making it hard to tell where one ends and another begins. The authors developed a neural network model that works at the letter level to split these merged words back into their original parts. Their best model does well on simpler cases but struggles with more complex ones, showing room for improvement. They also found that using the native Sinhala script rather than romanized text helped accuracy.
Open → 2609.36131v1

Large language models struggle to generate cultural kinship terms

Recognized but Not Produced: A Generation Benchmark for Culturally Specific Kinship Terms

Abstract: Current literature evaluates large language models (LLMs) on multilingual kinship understanding using multiple choice benchmarks, treating it as a recognition problem. We instead prompt five open weight LLMs to generate kinship terms in three non Western languages (Hindi, Tamil, and Korean) across two communicative tasks and pair this with a matched option-supported selection baseline. On identical relation language cells, GPT OSS120B selects the correct term in 90.67% of 75 valid cells but produces an accepted term in 36.00% of the corresponding attempts; Llama 3.370B shows the same pattern (77.92% versus 24.24%). Since the four-option condition displays the candidate terms and does not require script production, the difference is interpreted as an evaluation format gap rather than direct proof that lexical knowledge is intact. On explicitly specified L3 prompts, accuracy varies sharply, from GLM-5.1 at 72.29% to Llama-3.370B at 24.24%. The paternal-lineage advantage is language specific; it is large in Hindi but weak or reversed in Korean, while Tamil shared-term pairs provide a control for measurement variation. These results show that culturally specific kinship generation remains difficult even when the relationship is explicitly stated and motivate generation-based evaluation alongside multiple-choice testing.

Tue 22 SeptComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Understanding and using family relationship words correctly in different languages is hard for language AI. The authors tested several large language models with Hindi, Tamil, and Korean kinship terms to see if they could produce and recognize the right words. While models could often select the correct word from a list, they had much more difficulty producing those words on their own. This means that current AI still struggles with culturally specific kinship language, even when the relationships are clearly described.
Open → 2609.26942v1

Southeast Asian language AI improves reasoning and understanding skills

SEA-LION-v4.8: A Technical Report

Abstract: We introduce Nemotron-SEA-LION-v4.8, a family of Southeast Asian Languages in One Network (SEA-LION) built upon NVIDIA Nemotron 3. The family includes 30B-A3B and 120B-A12B models, with both continued-pretrained base checkpoints and post-trained variants. We adapt the models using Southeast Asian, reasoning, code, and multilingual parallel datasets, followed by post-training with supervised fine-tuning and online on-policy distillation. On SEA-HELM, the 30B-A3B model improves the overall SEA score from 46.06 to 51.57, while the 120B-A12B model improves from 49.30 to 63.44. The strongest gains are observed in instruction following, natural language reasoning, and natural language understanding across seven Southeast Asian languages.

Wed 16 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Understanding and using Southeast Asian languages on computers is challenging because these languages have unique features and limited resources. The authors developed two large AI models that learn multiple Southeast Asian languages together. They trained these models using special data, including reasoning and code tasks. The improved models perform better at following instructions and understanding natural language across seven Southeast Asian languages.
Open → 2609.18310v1

Arabic metaphor annotation guideline improves figurative language detection

AraMIP: Extending MIPVU Towards Metaphor Identification in Arabic

Abstract: Metaphor research has gained increasing attention due to its relevance to linguistic creativity, language use, cognitive processes, and related areas. While many efforts have been devoted to metaphor identification and annotation in English and other languages, Arabic remains under-resourced in this area. In this work, we propose the Arabic Metaphor Identification Procedure (AraMIP), a novel guideline for Arabic metaphor annotation. AraMIP builds on the widely used Metaphor Identification Procedure Vrije Universiteit (MIPVU) framework, incorporating adaptations that accounts for the language-specific properties of Arabic. We distinguish three major types of Arabic figurative language: Isti'ara (metaphor), kinaya (metonymy/indirect expression), and tashbih (simile), and annotate a pilot dataset of 300 sentences (5277 words). Our analysis reveals key challenges specific to Arabic, including morphological complexity, inconsistencies in dictionary sense ordering, and the absence of standardized contextual materials for annotators. This work contributes a first step toward standardized Arabic figurative instances and facilitates the development of larger annotated resources, thereby supporting future research on figurative language in Arabic.

Tue 15 SeptComputation and Language
The gist
Figurative language like metaphors is tricky to detect in Arabic because of the language's unique features. The authors created AraMIP, a new step-by-step guide to identify metaphors, similes, and indirect expressions in Arabic text. They tested AraMIP on a set of 300 sentences, revealing challenges like Arabic’s complex word forms and unclear dictionary meanings. This guide is a starting point to build bigger datasets for better language tools in Arabic.
Open → 2609.17235v1