Papers for
knowledge engineers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Minimum-cost certificates ensure rule conclusions withstand multiple source failures
Minimum-Cost Robust Evidence Certificates for Horn Reasoning under Correlated Source Failures
Abstract: A small justification for a rule-based conclusion may disappear when a source is withdrawn, and multiple derivations need not provide independent evidence. We study minimum-cost certificates that preserve a Horn conclusion under every withdrawal of at most k source domains. Evidence records remain distinct from asserted facts, supporting replicated attestations and overlapping failure dependencies. Transversals of minimal-support footprints characterize robustness and explain why disjoint-proof requirements can reject valid certificates. An exact procedure alternates weighted evidence selection with a source-failure oracle. A rule-closed counterinterpretation yields a globally valid selection cut without enumerating supports or failure scenarios. We prove correctness, finite termination, and cost optimality, establish coNP-completeness of unrestricted verification and NP-completeness of synthesis for every fixed budget, and identify a tractable reachability restriction. Experiments on controlled benchmarks, reachability graphs, and ontology-derived instances demonstrate that our counterinterpretation-guided synthesis achieves up to 92% optimum coverage within practical resource bounds, outperforming scenario expansion and general abduction while confirming the necessity of transversal-based reasoning over proof-packing heuristics.
Graph text formats affect reasoning accuracy in large language models
Graph Serializations for Reasoning LLMs: A Study Across Knowledge Extraction and Structural Reasoning
Abstract: The way a knowledge graph is serialized as text for inclusion into LLM context can substantially affect downstream LLM performance, with prior work reporting tens of percentage points variations across formats. However, existing studies consider only a limited set of representations and predate frontier reasoning models, which now offer stronger reasoning, instruction-following, and long-context capabilities. We evaluate 15 graph representation formats across nine frontier LLM configurations on ontology-based knowledge extraction and structural graph reasoning tasks. While knowledge extraction is relatively insensitive to different serialization formats, the choice of the optimal format for structural reasoning tasks significantly affects accuracy. We demonstrate that the optimal representation choice depends on model, query, and task and propose to approach graph serialization as a dynamic orchestration decision.
Language models improve translating natural language into logic formulas
Natural Language to First-Order Logic LLM-based Autoformalization
Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have renewed interest in autoformalization. Yet, when First-Order Logic (FOL) is considered as the target formalism, the field still lacks a unified task formulation and a systematic survey. This paper addresses this gap: we first provide a principled definition for the FOL-autoformalization task by distinguishing Ontology Extraction from Logical Translation, showing how their conflation obscures (cross-study) evaluation; we review existing datasets, evaluation metrics, and LLM-based methods, including fine-tuning, prompting, and verification-based refinement; we identify open challenges in benchmarking, semantic evaluation, ontology-aware methods, and end-to-end applications.
Organizing cognitive schemas by information to improve problem solving reuse
Cognitive Schemas, Laws and Tasks
Abstract: This paper asks how explicit representations can support reusable cognitive schemas in knowledge-based problem solving. We develop a structural framework in which schemas are organized by the information and relations required for their use, rather than introduced as unrelated primitives. The framework also distinguishes context-dependent relations from more stable structures that can be reused across different representations. Tasks are described through the information available, the unknowns to be determined, and the constraints that admissible solutions must satisfy. This makes it possible to separate limitations of the representation from limitations of the solving procedure. In particular, we distinguish inconsistency, underdetermination, and contextual insufficiency, where the current representation lacks distinctions or relations required by the external task meaning. We also show formally when a reduction of representation preserves the task-relevant solution structure. The resulting task--schema interface offers a structured way to describe representational conditions relevant to problem solving. It supports the reuse and stabilization of derived knowledge while remaining independent of the particular mechanism used to generate candidate solutions. This may provide a useful component for future solver architectures that combine structured knowledge, verification, and learned proposal mechanisms.
MemoryAgentBench conflict scores largely match simple last-write rule
Bookkeeping, Composition, or Unreachable Gold? Reading MemoryAgentBench's Conflict-Resolution Scores Against a Frozen Last-Write Resolver
Abstract: MemoryAgentBench's Conflict Resolution split is read as measuring "selective forgetting". We execute the benchmark's own rule - the newest statement about a fact wins - as a zero-learning resolver frozen on one of the four fact lists. Under the official metric the rule answers 80.25% of the questions (74.5% on the three held-out lists). Of the rest, 67 items have a released gold that the last-write graph cannot reach but overwritten statements would ("The capital of India is New Delhi." superseded by "The capital of India is Grosseto."; gold New Delhi); such items are a third of the multi-hop questions at 262K. Two long-context models and our pre-registered approximate re-implementation of the benchmark's BM25 agent, one retained run per item and outcomes only, score 84.7%, 82.6% and 41.6% on the items the rule solves against 10.4%, 11.9% and 6.0% on those 67. The failures are a reachability split plus a small parser-scope residual; the per-item split, not the aggregate, is the unit at which a score here can be read.
OntoInk combines ontology diagrams and validation in documentation pages
OntoInk: Interactive Ontology Visualization, Validation, and Reasoning
Abstract: Ontology documentation, visualization, and validation are usually carried out with separate tools. This split workflow slows down development and makes knowledge transfer harder. We present OntoInk, an open-source MkDocs plugin that brings these activities together. Within a single documentation-as-code pipeline, OntoInk renders interactive ontology diagrams, validates instance data against SHACL shapes, runs OWL\,DL reasoning, and supports inline Turtle editing. General-purpose diagram plugins for MkDocs cannot parse RDF, dereference IRIs, overlay SHACL constraints, or run OWL reasoning. Compared with standalone ontology visualization tools, OntoInk embeds interactive and editable diagrams directly into documentation pages. A live demo and source code are available at \url{https://ise-fizkarlsruhe.github.io/ontoink/}.
Deep search agents improved for longer complex queries and reasoning
LexiHorizon: Stabilizing Reinforcement Learning for Long-Horizon Deep Search
Abstract: Deep search agents tackle complex knowledge tasks through iterative retrieval, multi-hop reasoning, and evidence synthesis across multiple sources. Existing approaches typically assume relatively stable retrieval systems and operate over short-horizon tool interaction. However, when retrieval is sensitive to query formulation, even a semantically appropriate query may fail to surface critical evidence because of mismatched entity names, aliases, or keyword combinations. Recovering from such failures requires repeated query reformulation and longer interaction trajectories. This setting poses a distinct training challenge, as the policy must sustain long-horizon query exploration while managing an expanding volume of retrieved content. We propose LexiHorizon, a framework for training search agents over long horizons that expands the trajectory context budget, manages accumulated retrieval content using a window over recent tool observations while preserving the reasoning history, and introduces an outcome-gated search-effort reward that provides a bounded bonus for tool invocations to trajectories with nonzero answer reward. Experiments on XBench, WebWalkerQA, and BrowseComp-ZH show that the resulting 9B model consistently outperforms both its base model and MiroThinker-1.7-mini, with maximum absolute gains of 8.7 and 23.8 percentage points, respectively. These results suggest that combining an extended context budget with reasoning-preserving context management benefits long-horizon deep search agents.
Large language model aids discovery of links between different ontologies
LLM-Assisted Discovery of Typed Semantic Links for Ontology Network Construction
Abstract: Constructing typed, justified semantic links between ontologies is essential for enabling interoperability across heterogeneous and interdisciplinary knowledge domains. However, manually curating such links is difficult to scale. To address this challenge, we propose an end-to-end framework for ontology network construction that automates the discovery and generation of both intra-domain and inter-domain relationships. Our approach combines domain-adapted DistilBERT embeddings for dense contextual representation, clustering-based pre-filtering to reduce the candidate search space, and GPT-4o-driven relationship generation via iterative prompt engineering to produce semantically rich, interpretable links. Applied to ReproduceMeON - a network of 33 ontologies spanning machine learning, microscopy, computational science, and experimental workflow - the pipeline reduces approximately 800k raw concept pairs to 95k high-quality candidates. Human expert validation of 429 generated relationships by two independent annotators yields an overall precision of 80.19% (91.49% on high-certainty annotations) and an F1 of 0.890, with substantial inter-annotator agreement. Comparative experiments against five similarity-based baselines, including Sentence-BERT, show a substantial performance gap (best baseline F1 = 0.581), while an ablation study demonstrates that similarity-based methods alone fail to discriminate valid from invalid relationships (AUC approx 0.5) on the filtered candidate set. These findings highlight the necessity of LLM-based reasoning over concept roles and domain semantics for accurate relationship construction.