Papers for

iot system architects

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Multi-path network boosts edge server handling for many IoT devices

MANE: A Multi-Path Adaptive Network for Edge Onloading of Deep Neural Networks

Abstract: Split computing constitutes a widely used distributed inference approach, where a lightweight head model is onloaded onto the device and a heavier tail model resides on an edge server, leveraging the growing computational capabilities of modern System-on-Chips while alleviating server load. As intelligent indoor environments such as smart offices grow increasingly populated with diverse IoT devices, a single edge server must simultaneously assist multiple devices, each competing for the same shared inference resources. Without a principled mechanism to manage this shared load, the server is quickly overwhelmed, causing latency SLO violations and rendering server-assisted inference ineffective. In this work, we present MANE, a distributed inference framework that equips the server with a multi-path tail architecture, enabling a dynamic accuracy--throughput trade-off at runtime. By introducing a novel multi-path model architecture, a three-stage training scheme featuring a Joint Head Network Distillation loss and a hysteresis-based scheduler with an equitable device-fallback policy, MANE maintains over 80% SLO satisfaction rate where state-of-the-art onloading methods fail completely, while preserving accuracy 6pp higher than on-device alternatives, across up to 40 concurrent devices.

Sun 13 SeptDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingArtificial Intelligence
The gist
When many smart devices try to use a shared edge server to run parts of their AI models, the server can get overwhelmed and slow down. The authors designed MANE, a system that lets the server switch between different versions of a model to balance accuracy and speed during busy times. MANE also helps decide fairly which devices get full service and which fall back on simpler models so the system keeps working smoothly. Tests showed MANE keeps most devices running on time and more accurate than just letting devices do inference on their own.
Open → 2609.14660v1

Gap found in cloud edge iot systems for llm based resource control

Smart Adaptive Computing Across the Continuum: LLMs in IoT-Edge-Cloud Resource Management

Abstract: Managing resources across IoT, edge, and cloud layers calls for continuous, context-aware decisions under constraints that rarely stay fixed. Deep reinforcement learning (DRL) handles this class of problems well, and large language models (LLMs) are increasingly used to augment DRL pipelines, yet the architectural relationship between the two is seldom made explicit. We build on Wang et al.'s taxonomy of Continuum Orchestration Systems employing DRL techniques and extend it with two further dimensions. The AI Augmentation Paradigm measures how LLMs are exploited, while the Feedback channel captures whether and through which system path the execution feedback returns to the LLM in order to close the MAPE control loop at the LLM Orchestration layer. We apply this taxonomy to six recent system architectures and find a common gap, as none combines full LLM orchestration with full agent-layer feedback in a Cloud Continuum setting. We relate this gap to a missing cross-tier feedback abstraction, bridging the incommensurable per-tier signals and the LLM Orchestrator.

Tue 8 SeptDistributed, Parallel, and Cluster ComputingArtificial IntelligenceMultiagent Systems
The gist
Managing computing resources that span from tiny devices (IoT) to large cloud servers is tricky because conditions keep changing. The authors look at how two AI tools—deep reinforcement learning (DRL) and large language models (LLMs)—can work together to make smarter management decisions. They extend an existing classification system to better understand how LLMs are used and how feedback is fed back into the system. Their review of recent systems finds a key missing piece: no system fully uses LLM-driven control while getting complete feedback from all parts of the system. They identify this as a challenge needing better communication across different system layers.
Open → 2609.09348v1