Papers for

interactive chatbot developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Selective cache reuse improves reliability in repeated AI requests

Request Order Matters: Cache-History Sensitivity in Selective KV-Cache Reuse for Rolling Agents

Abstract: Long-running agents repeatedly call an LLM while retaining most of their document window, evicting old documents, and appending new ones. These rolling updates break exact prefix caching and motivate non-prefix KV-cache reuse with selective recomputation. We show that persistent KV-cache reuse with selective recomputation can be history-dependent: in our rolling-agent workload, an unchanged prompt can produce different answers depending on the requests processed before it. At a matched 5% recomputation budget, document-aligned recomputation reduces answer variation across request orders from 69.0% with CacheBlend's token top-$k$ policy to 26.1%. When each prompt is evaluated after a different sequence of preceding requests, document-aligned recomputation improves fidelity to full prefill by 34.5-52.5 percentage points over token top-$k$, while both policies achieve approximately 5.7$\times$ median TTFT speedup. Our ablation study shows that, in our rolling-agent workload, contiguity is the main factor associated with robust selective recomputation.

Mon 5 OctArtificial IntelligenceMachine LearningPerformance
The gist
When AI agents use a language model repeatedly with overlapping documents, their usual method of remembering old results doesn't always work perfectly. The authors show that reusing parts of the model’s memory selectively, focusing on chunks of documents rather than just trying to keep top tokens, helps reduce inconsistencies in answers. Their method ensures that even if the order of requests changes, the AI gives more stable and reliable responses while still being much faster than full recomputation.
Open → 2610.05833v1

Multimodal models get better at avoiding false emotion guesses

Multi-Faceted Evaluation and Mitigation of Emotion Hallucinations in MLLMs

Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have shown strong potential in open-ended emotion understanding, yet they often generate emotion hallucinations. Evaluating such hallucinations is particularly challenging for two reasons. First, emotion understanding spans multiple cognitive facets, from multimodal perception to psychological reasoning. Second, emotional interpretations are expressed in free-form language, making existing closed-ended protocols insufficient for evaluation. To address these challenges, we introduce EHR (Emotion Hallucination Rate), an evaluator that quantifies emotion hallucinations across six facets: expression, action, audio, instinct, logic, and conclusion. Using EHR, we reveal that existing mitigation methods often reduce hallucinations in some facets while aggravating them in others, exposing the limitation of coarse-grained correction and the need for facet-aware localization and mitigation. Motivated by this finding, we propose HMER (Hallucination-aware Memory-guided Emotion Reasoning), a training-free framework for emotion hallucination mitigation. HMER maintains a Hallucination Memory that records localized hallucinated claims and enables targeted logit rectification, together with an Anchor Memory that preserves reliable intermediate reasoning states to stabilize subsequent generation. By selectively suppressing unreliable cues while preserving trustworthy reasoning context, HMER enables fine-grained mitigation across diverse hallucination facets. Extensive experiments on 19 MLLMs demonstrate the prevalence of emotion hallucinations and the effectiveness of our framework across diverse model architectures.

Thu 10 SeptMultimedia
The gist
Multimodal large language models can understand emotions but sometimes mistakenly invent feelings that aren’t really there, called emotion hallucinations. The authors created a new way to measure these mistakes across different types of emotional reasoning. They found that many fixes only address some mistakes but make others worse. To improve this, they designed a new method that remembers and targets specific errors during emotion understanding to reduce hallucinations more precisely. Their experiments show this method works on many types of models.
Open → 2609.11154v1