Papers for

insurance analysts

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Boosting method models insurance claims frequency and severity jointly

Joint Distributional Copula Regression for Insurance Claim Frequency and Severity via Boosting

Abstract: In this paper, we propose a model-based boosting approach for fitting structured additive distributional copula regression models with bivariate responses, focusing particularly on the joint modeling of claim frequency and claim severity. The proposed approach is based on generalized additive models for location, scale, and shape (GAMLSS), which extend the general idea of GAMs by allowing multiple parameters of a response distribution, rather than only its conditional mean, to depend on covariates. The model is therefore intrinsically interpretable at the level of its additive predictors, providing greater transparency and auditability than black-box alternatives. We evaluate the proposed framework using synthetic and real-world data. We demonstrate its ability to recover the underlying covariate effects and dependence structure, identify informative variables, and achieve competitive predictive performance relative to benchmark models. We also illustrate how the fitted model can be interpreted.

Tue 27 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Insurance companies want to understand how often claims happen and how much those claims cost. The authors developed a new statistical method that looks at both the number of claims and their costs together, using patterns in data. Their method is easy to interpret and helps find important factors influencing claims. It also performs well compared to other common techniques.
Open → 2610.36835v1

Global building maps compared for accuracy in different cities

A comparative assessment of global building and settlement datasets across geographic and settlement contexts

Abstract: Global building and settlement datasets increasingly support population mapping, exposure assessment, urban monitoring, and other analyses of the built environment, yet comparative evidence remains fragmented across products, geographic regions, reference datasets, spatial scales, and evaluation methods. We benchmark seven global or near-global products, including Overture Maps, Global Building Atlas, 3D-GloBFP, Google Open Buildings 2.5D Temporal (OBT), Microsoft TEMPO, GHSL, and WSF Tracker, against harmonized reference footprints across 135 study areas. The evaluation combines complementary measures of detection, geometric agreement, and aggregate quantity accuracy, together with stratified analyses of settlement characteristics and diagnostic experiments on error size and temporal alignment. Overture achieved the highest median city-level vector F1 (0.786). Raster rankings were resolution-dependent: OBT achieved the highest median F1 at 10m (0.642), whereas WSF Tracker led at 100m (0.862). However, WSF Tracker substantially overestimated built-up area, emphasizing that when using raster products, it is important for the user to understand whether the raster identifies only buildings or includes additional impervious surfaces. Raster accuracy increased consistently with building density (Spearman \r{ho} = 0.58-0.75), while small candidate buildings were disproportionately associated with false positives in the vector products. Temporally aligning WSF Tracker with reference imagery increased mean F1 by 0.060 (median +0.037), indicating that the reported accuracies are conservative in rapidly growing areas. The study establishes a reproducible benchmark for comparing heterogeneous global urban and settlement layer datasets across geographic and settlement contexts.

Wed 23 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Maps of buildings and settlements around the world are important for many uses, like tracking population or city growth. The authors compared seven popular global building maps to see how well they match real city shapes and sizes. They found some maps work better in certain conditions, like different map resolutions or city sizes. This study helps users pick the right map and understand the strengths and limits of each dataset.
Open → 2609.28154v1

AI transforms catastrophe risk modeling with cheaper weather scenarios

From Manual Construction to AI-Driven Scenario Emergence: Rethinking Catastrophe Risk Modeling

Abstract: Traditional catastrophe (CAT) risk models rely on costly manual construction to generate extreme weather scenarios, an approach largely unchanged since the 1990s. As climate extremes intensify, this creates mounting challenges to the entire risk transfer chain. This study proposes the TAISE framework, which repurposes AI weather forecasting models to produce coherent extreme weather sequences at a fraction of traditional costs. Through self-iterative generation, the framework produces continuous global atmospheric fields from which extreme events emerge. A proof-of-concept experiment demonstrates an order-of-magnitude reduction in computational cost compared with conventional methods, while capturing temporal continuity and cross-regional correlations absent in snapshot-based approaches. These findings suggest a pathway toward democratising catastrophe risk quantification and enabling dynamic, comprehensive portfolio assessment for insurers, reinsurers, ILS fund managers and public-sector risk managers.

Tue 15 SeptArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Traditional ways to predict extreme weather for insurance and risk management are slow and expensive. The authors propose using AI models that forecast weather to generate continuous and realistic sequences of extreme weather at a much lower cost. Their method keeps track of how weather events change over time and connect across regions, which older methods miss. This could make it easier and faster for insurers and government agencies to measure and prepare for disaster risks.
Open → 2609.16493v1