Papers for

information retrieval teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

SteerSearch improves interactive search with mid-search user redirection

SteerSearch: Interactive Search Reasoning with Mid-Response Steering

Abstract: Search-augmented language models increasingly serve as long-horizon research agents, yet most open training methods assume a fixed user goal throughout search. We study mid-response steering, where users redirect a model during ongoing reasoning or retrieval. We identify answer-target anchoring, a failure mode in which fixed-query search agents retrieve evidence for the updated request but still answer an earlier question. We introduce SteerSearch, an RL framework that trains on interactive search trajectories with injected interventions to enable context-preserving target reassignment, and SteerSearch-Bench, a benchmark adapted from multi-hop QA datasets. We also investigate Contrastive Context Reward (CCR), an auxiliary signal for aligning post-intervention reasoning with the updated goal. Without CCR, SteerSearch improves average steering accuracy over Search-R1 from 11.1% to 31.3% on Qwen2.5-3B and from 36.6% to 44.6% on Qwen3-4B, while preserving standard single-query performance. Gains also extend to larger Qwen2.5 models and natural multi-turn conversations.

Fri 16 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
When people search for answers using AI models, they sometimes change their questions while the AI is still thinking. The researchers noticed that many models fail to update their answers properly after such changes. They created SteerSearch, a new method that helps the AI adjust its reasoning during the search to match the updated question. Their experiments showed that SteerSearch significantly improves the accuracy of such real-time user corrections without losing the ability to answer normal questions.
Open → 2610.24287v1

TopicMerge combines fast and smart methods for better topic grouping

TopicMerge: A Divide and Conquer Approach to Topic Modeling

Abstract: Recent advancements in topic modeling have split into two main paths: efficient embedding-based methods that offer scalability but are often outperformed on standard clustering metrics, and Large Language Model (LLM) approaches that achieve state-of-the-art clustering performance but at the cost of prohibitive computational expense and poor scalability. This paper introduces TopicMerge, a novel multi-stage pipeline that bridges these approaches to achieve both state-of-the-art clustering performance and computational efficiency. TopicMerge first employs an efficient clustering pipeline to deliberately over-segment a document corpus into a large set of fine-grained, semantically pure micro-clusters, which are then given initial semantic labels. It then introduces a novel, iterative merging algorithm where an LLM, guided by local neighborhood context, arbitrates on consolidating candidate pairs. These approved merges are then selectively executed and semantically relabeled by the LLM, hierarchically building broader, more coherent topics. Extensive experiments on the Bills and Wiki datasets show that TopicMerge achieves state-of-the-art clustering performance while reducing required LLM calls by over 92% compared to document-level methods, offering a practical and scalable solution.

Wed 14 OctComputation and LanguageMachine Learning
The gist
Grouping documents into topics is hard because fast methods miss some details, while smart AI tools are too slow for large amounts of data. The authors came up with TopicMerge, which first breaks documents into many tiny, clear groups quickly. Then it uses a smart AI to carefully combine these small groups into bigger, meaningful topics. This way, TopicMerge is both accurate and fast, using way fewer AI calls than older methods.
Open → 2610.19323v1

Hybrid reasoning improves AI agents for faster and cheaper results

Hybrid Reasoning Agents

Abstract: How can we build an agent that thinks beyond human language, yet still acts through it in the external environment? Modern LLM agents still reason and interact through text, while latent reasoning offers an efficient internal medium but lacks native tool access and reasoning transparency. We bridge these two directions with Hybrid Reasoning Agents (HybridAgents), which dynamically navigate between latent reasoning and text-based interaction throughout a unified generation process. Architecturally, a lightweight HybridLink enables seamless transitions between text and latent modes, while the agent's continuous working memory preserves lossless hybrid context across multiple turns. These designs preserve tool-integrated agentic capabilities while making latent thoughts directly inspectable. Building on this architecture, we further develop dedicated post-training algorithms for hybrid reasoning: HybridSFT stabilizes tool-integrated hybrid generation by teaching the backbone to coordinate with HybridLink, then HybridRL scales reasoning by learning when to think in latent space and when to act through text. We evaluate HybridAgent at 3 model scales across 11 benchmarks covering mathematics, science, medicine, search, and agentic reasoning. Compared with frontier LLM Agents and agentic frameworks spanning both text-based and latent methods, HybridAgent consistently improves performance by 10.4%, while delivering 35.5%-54.7% token reduction, 1.8x-2.6x faster inference, and 2.7x-3.7x cost savings. Code and data are available at https://github.com/togethercomputer/HybridAgent.

Tue 13 OctComputation and LanguageArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Modern AI agents often process all reasoning through text, which is slow and costly, while some methods use hidden computations that are faster but less clear and lack tool use. The authors present HybridAgents, which switch smoothly between hidden thinking and text communication, keeping all context intact and allowing tool use and inspection of the agent's thoughts. They also develop training methods to help these agents decide when to use hidden reasoning and when to talk through text. Tests show the approach improves performance, speeds up processing, and cuts costs across many fields.
Open → 2610.18861v1

JevGPT improves autonomous research with fast and slow thinking

JevGPT: Thinking Fast and Slow in Autonomous Research

Abstract: Autonomous research agents must acquire and reason over evidence within a limited budget. Yet relevant sources can remain uninspected or unused, leaving a gap between retrieval coverage and the evidence that informs research. The challenge is to align fast local judgments with changing evidence needs and feed their findings back into research decisions. We introduce JevGPT, a dual-system architecture for autonomous research that couples fast evidence processing with deliberative research planning. System Two sets evidence objectives and integrates findings, while System One locates support, assesses relevance, and guides further inspection. Independent source judgments run in parallel; selected original passages inform the next research step. Experiments on fixed-corpus question answering and document ranking show that JevGPT achieves leading task performance, with faster completion and lower cost than comparably effective research agents. Evidence analysis shows broader source inspection and greater coverage of supporting documents in the research loop, highlighting efficient evidence processing as a route to more capable autonomous research.

Tue 13 OctComputation and LanguageArtificial IntelligenceInformation Retrieval
The gist
Autonomous research agents often have limited time and resources to gather and understand information, which means they might miss important evidence. The researchers developed JevGPT, a system that combines quick judgments with careful planning to better find and use information. This approach helps the system cover more sources and make better decisions about what to investigate next. Experiments show JevGPT works faster and cheaper while achieving strong performance on research tasks.
Open → 2610.18272v1

Geometric features explain varied neighbor loss in text embedding compression

Geometric Structure Predicts Per-Example Neighborhood Loss Under PCA Truncation

Abstract: Dimensionality reduction can preserve the average performance of text embeddings even when a substantial fraction of their dimensions is removed. Aggregate metrics, however, do not reveal whether degradation is distributed uniformly across examples. We study per-example neighborhood stability under PCA truncation across static word embeddings and modern sentence encoders. Per-item neighbor retention varies widely and is predictable from geometric properties of the representation and its alignment with the retained PCA subspace. The fraction of centered-vector energy retained by the truncated subspace is strongest for CBOW and RI, with neighborhood contrast leading on SkipGram and the modern/Matryoshka settings (GTE approximately tied), while local density is associated with retention in marginal analysis but adds little unique information once energy and contrast are controlled (R-squared increments 0.001 to 0.010). Local intrinsic dimensionality accounts for more variation than density on modern sentence encoders in pairwise comparison. On SciFact, query density predicts retrieval degradation under aggressive compression; on NFCorpus the primary 32d association does not replicate, and a direct variance-restriction test leaves that null unresolved. Average compression performance conceals systematic per-example variation that geometry makes visible.

Tue 13 OctComputation and LanguageMachine Learning
The gist
When reducing the size of text word or sentence embeddings by cutting down dimensions, the average quality stays good, but some individual examples lose important neighborhood details. The authors show that how much a specific example’s neighbors are preserved depends on geometric factors in the embedding space and how they align with the kept dimensions. Different measures of geometry like energy preserved, neighborhood contrast, and local density help predict which examples retain structure better. This understanding helps reveal that average compression metrics hide big differences in how individual examples are affected.
Open → 2610.17742v1

Hypergraph method improves multi-label classification accuracy significantly

HyperLabel: Multi-Label Classification via Hypergraph-Based Label Correlation Modeling

Abstract: Multi-label classification (MLC) requires predicting multiple relevant labels for each instance, where a central challenge is modeling complex label dependencies arising from co-occurrence patterns. Existing approaches are limited in capturing high-order label correlations, relying on implicit learning through contrastive objectives or pairwise attention mechanisms without structural guidance. We propose HyperLabel, an encoder-decoder framework that explicitly models label dependencies through hypergraph neural networks. Our contributions are twofold: (i) We construct a label hypergraph where sample-defined hyperedges naturally encode multi-way co-occurrence patterns, providing explicit structural prior knowledge that captures relationships beyond pairwise interactions. (ii) We propose a unified cross-modal learning approach where HGNN+ performs bidirectional message passing to integrate feature information with label structure, and a shared cross-attention decoder processes both modalities through complementary learning objectives. Extensive experiments on seven benchmark datasets demonstrate that HyperLabel achieves state-of-the-art performance, with particularly significant improvements on macro-F1 scores (+10.3% on Delicious, +8.2% on Bibtex), validating that explicit hypergraph structure effectively captures complex label relationships. The code is available at https://github.com/iZHpy/Multi-label_hypergraph .

Sat 26 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Multi-label classification means predicting all the correct labels for something, like tagging pictures with multiple objects. The challenge is labels often appear together in complex ways, which traditional methods don't fully capture. The authors propose HyperLabel, a method that uses a special kind of network called a hypergraph to directly model these multi-way label connections. Their tests show this approach does better than previous methods on several datasets, especially in terms of balanced accuracy across labels.
Open → 2609.32276v1

Block sparse attention speeds up long text processing in language models

Block Sparse Attention with Log-Linear Complexity

Abstract: Scaling language models to long contexts is limited by the quadratic cost of self-attention. Block sparse attention offers an efficient alternative, but selecting the retained blocks remains a bottleneck. Conventional block selection requires scoring all query-block pairs and therefore remains quadratic in sequence length. To address this issue, we propose PISA, a block-sparse attention mechanism that employs a pyramid Top-$K$ selection strategy. The main idea is to gradually narrow down the candidates across different levels, making it more efficient to find the most relevant keys. Specifically, we construct a coarse-to-fine hierarchy of keys and perform selection from the coarsest level. At each level, LogSumExp scoring is applied to a bounded candidate set to select candidates for the next finer level, continuing until the finest level is reached. Through pooling, we construct $O(\log N)$ levels of keys, yielding an overall complexity of $O(N\log N)$, where $N$ denotes the sequence length. We develop hardware-aware Triton kernels for both training and inference, fusing hierarchical routing and LogSumExp scoring without materializing the query-key score matrix. We further evaluate our method on language modeling tasks. Compared with the baseline, our method achieves comparable performance on benchmarks such as commonsense reasoning while delivering better results on retrieval tasks.

Fri 25 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Long pieces of text are hard for computers to fully analyze because the usual method of paying attention to every part with every other part gets very slow. The authors created a way to break the text into blocks and smartly pick only the most important blocks to focus on, making the process much faster. They do this by organizing the blocks in levels from coarse to fine, quickly narrowing down which parts to pay attention to without checking everything. Their new method works faster and keeps similar quality when tested on language understanding and retrieval tasks.
Open → 2609.31093v1

Hyperbolic continual learning improves multimodal task retention

Hyperbolic Multimodal Continual Learning: A Closest-Admissible Solution

Abstract: Existing continual-learning methods protect parameters, replayed examples, or Euclidean feature subspaces. When applied to hyperbolic multimodal models, they do not explicitly preserve the Lorentz geometry that jointly encodes within-modality similarity, cross-modal correspondence, and semantic hierarchy; sequential updates can therefore retain task scores while still distorting previously learned relations. We address this gap with Hyperbolic Multimodal Continual Learning (HMCL). We show that preserving the old multimodal geometry amounts to restricting all modalities to one shared hyperbolic isometry, which induces a family of admissible first-order parameter changes. We formulate a joint closest-admissible (CA) correction that retains the shared rotation best matching the candidate modal updates; its minimal-rotation (MR) special case fixes this rotation to zero. Both variants correct the displacement realized by AdamW, and task anchoring bounds within-task accumulation while preserving learning freedom. Across a unified 16-task classification-retrieval stream with three hyperbolic backbones, HMCL improves final performance and backward transfer over sequential fine-tuning and four continual-learning baselines; HMCL-CA gives the highest Overall score on every backbone. A modality-extended stream confirms the retrieval gains. Representation analyses find 81.2 to 95.5 percent less radial, angular, cross-modal, and paired-distance drift; ImageNet-WordNet results show better semantic ancestry and radial hierarchy.

Thu 24 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Learning multiple tasks one after another is hard because new learning can mess up what was learned before. The authors focus on models that learn from different types of data, like images and words, organized in a special curved space called hyperbolic space. They found a way to update these models that keeps the important geometric relationships between tasks intact, so the models remember old knowledge better while learning new tasks. Their method showed better performance and less distortion in the learned representations compared to other approaches.
Open → 2609.29329v1

Learned context planning falls short of strong retrieval in long QA

When Learned Context Planning Fails to Beat Strong Retrieval: A Controlled Study of Planning, Routing, and Reranking for Long-Context QA

Abstract: Learned context planning selects evidence atoms before an answer model reasons over them. We test whether this learned selection improves long-context multiple-choice QA after strong retrieval, routing, budgeted-selector, and reranking controls. Our primary diagnostic uses all 503 LongBench-v2 MCQ questions with Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct. The planner is SFT-trained on outcome-selected traces from 140 training and 28 development questions; because the 503-question analysis includes those questions, it is partly transductive. At an 18k-character budget, anchored hybrid retrieval reaches 36.18% accuracy and BM25 reaches 35.98%, while the best direct planner-guided method reaches 34.19%. On the untouched 152-question test split, anchored hybrid remains higher (42.11% versus 36.84%). Leakage-safe routers cannot convert a large oracle gap. Under tight budgets, the best planner is ahead by only 0.40 points at 6k and loses at 9k; planner-guided reranking has a +1.79-point estimate at 6k with a paired interval crossing zero and ties the control at 9k. Packing-order and score-flatness analyses did not identify a stable mechanism. Under this setup, learned planning is a weak relevance signal rather than a replacement for strong retrieval.

Tue 22 SeptComputation and LanguageInformation Retrieval
The gist
Answering questions using very long documents is hard because you have to pick the right bits of information first. This paper tested if teaching a model to select helpful pieces of context before answering helps more than just using strong search methods. The authors found that learned planning methods do not outperform strong retrieval techniques for long multiple-choice question answering. Their tests suggest it’s better to rely on good retrieval than on learned planning in this setting.
Open → 2609.26976v1

Language model document storage methods compared for accuracy and cost

Where Should a Document Live: Context, Representations, or Parameters?

Abstract: To answer questions outside of their pre-training data, large language models (LLMs) need access to new information, which can be presented in the context window as documents, encoded into the model's parameters, or injected as latent representations. However, each of these methods comes with different efficiency, cost, and performance trade-offs, with no single winner. We present a controlled comparison of representation-based (KV-cache based) and parametric (fine-tuning-based) adaptation methods on five knowledge-intensive benchmarks. We show that in the oracle setting, Cartridges (KV) are the most accurate injection method at nearly every storage budget, outperforming parametric methods by 10 points. Compaction (KV) matches Cartridges only at low compression rates, lagging behind the parametric methods by 10 points at rates higher than $50\times$. In the more realistic multi-document retrieval scenario, Cartridges are the only method that matches in-context learning (ICL), leading the parametric methods by 29 points and Compaction by 15 points. Nonetheless, Cartridges are also the only method, besides full fine-tuning and large MLP adapters, that suffers from catastrophic forgetting, i.e., a 6% performance degradation on control benchmarks, with 13% in coding.

Tue 15 SeptComputation and LanguageArtificial Intelligence
The gist
When large language models face questions about new information, they can include that information in three ways: in the text they process ('context'), by changing what they already know ('parameters'), or by adding special memory pieces ('representations'). This paper compares two methods—adding memory pieces (called Cartridges) and changing what the model already knows (fine-tuning)—to see which is better. The researchers found that memory pieces usually give more accurate answers and work better when dealing with many documents, but they can cause the model to forget old information more than other methods. Different ways of storing information have trade-offs in accuracy, cost, and what the model forgets.
Open → 2609.17346v1