Papers for

industrial robot teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Networked humanoid robots improve teamwork and human interaction

Networked Humanoid Intelligence: Communication, Coordination, Collaboration, and Social Interaction

Abstract: Humanoid robots are moving from laboratory platforms toward connected fleets that share workspaces, infrastructure, tasks, and knowledge with other robots and humans. As deployments grow, the operation and improvement of each humanoid depend on information exchanged across the network. However, existing research has largely studied humanoids as individual systems. This survey examines networked humanoid intelligence through four functions of information exchange: communication, coordination, collaboration, and social intelligence with human interaction. We first establish the foundations of networked humanoid systems, define the question addressed by each function, and connect them through a common factory scenario. We review the literature along six dimensions: interaction architecture, exchanged information, physical coupling, operating timescale, system scale, and embodiment. We separate results obtained with physical and simulated humanoids from those based on other robotic platforms or disembodied agents, because the latter do not fully capture humanoid-specific constraints such as balance, whole-body motion, contact, and physical interaction. We examine hardware, datasets, and benchmarks, and distinguish risks handled locally from those networking introduces, such as stale information or unsafe knowledge propagation. Finally, we identify open problems in control-aware networking, compact body-centric messages, physically grounded coordination, network- and embodiment-aware knowledge sharing, fleet-level social consistency, and accountable human oversight.

Mon 26 OctRoboticsEmerging TechnologiesNetworking and Internet Architecture
The gist
Humanoid robots are becoming more connected and working together along with humans in shared spaces. This paper reviews how these robots communicate, coordinate, collaborate, and interact socially over networks. It looks at the challenges of sharing information while moving and balancing, which are unique to humanoid robots. The authors also discuss risks of network delays and errors, and suggest future research directions for safer, smarter robot fleets.
Open → 2610.34740v1

Physics guided visual prompts improve robot navigation around invisible hazards

Seeing the Invisible: Physics-Guided Visual Prompting for Temperature- and Radiation-Aware VLA Navigation

Abstract: Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models have become a major paradigm for Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN). However, in safety-critical facilities, invisible risks such as radiation or temperature spikes cannot be detected by an RGB camera, and handling each risk is expensive, requiring a new encoder, new data, and model retraining. We propose Physics-Guided Visual Prompting (PG-VP), a plug-and-play multimodal perception module that instead reuses what a frozen VLA model already does well: avoiding visible obstacles. Given a proximal radiation or thermal source, PG-VP performs a physics-guided risk assessment to determine the avoidance direction and overlays a corresponding virtual obstacle that moves across consecutive frames (Dynamic Visual Prompting). The navigation policy then naturally detours around this invisible hazard. The identical virtual obstacle is used regardless of hazard type, so the visual prompting pattern remains fixed as sensors are added. When no hazard is detected, nothing is rendered, and the policy behaves exactly as it would without PG-VP. We evaluate PG-VP on OmniNav using the val-unseen splits of R2R-CE and RxR-CE, where it guides the policy toward intended low-risk actions in 84.9% and 83.2% of cases, at a cost of 6.8 and 7.9 percentage points in navigation success rate. We further test it with distinct scenarios on a real robot in the presence of actual thermal and radiation sources, all without any retraining. The real test shows that PG-VP effectively avoids these invisible hazards, improving worst-10% average trajectory safety by 63.45% and 32.59% against thermal and radiation sources, respectively.

Tue 6 OctRoboticsArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Robots often use cameras to see obstacles, but some dangers like radiation or high temperatures can't be seen by normal cameras. The authors created a way for robots to 'imagine' these invisible risks by adding virtual obstacles that appear in the robot’s camera view based on physics data. This helps the robot avoid these dangers without needing to retrain or change its existing vision system. Their method works well in simulations and real robots near actual radiation and heat sources.
Open → 2610.07558v1