Papers for

industrial robot developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Foundation models improve safety assurance for learning enabled systems

Assuring Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systems with Foundation Models: A Neuro-Symbolic Agenda for Testing, Verification, and Runtime Assurance

Abstract: Learning-enabled cyber-physical systems (CPS), including autonomous vehicles and UAVs, increasingly incorporate foundation models, yet fragmented assurance practices provide insufficient support for system-level guarantees. We argue that restoring engineering control across stochastic neural, symbolic, and physical boundaries requires a shift from model-centric evaluation to system-level assurance. We introduce the Foundation Model Assurance Stack, connecting three directions: (i) neuro-symbolic architectures that constrain foundation models through explicit symbolic world models, reasoning layers, and interfaces; (ii) semantically grounded, conformance-based testing that combines formal specifications and symbolic world models with foundation-model-assisted specification mining, scenario generation, and test synthesis; and (iii) compositional verification and runtime assurance that target formally tractable components and interfaces through modular contracts, equivalence checking, verified synthesis, uncertainty-aware reasoning, and runtime monitoring and enforcement. Symbolic abstractions establish assurance boundaries between stochastic learning and formal reasoning, connecting testing, verification, and runtime evidence across the system lifecycle. Foundation models serve as constrained assistants whose outputs are independently checked wherever correctness can be formally specified. We identify research challenges in specification engineering, abstraction fidelity, evidence composition, and lifecycle certification, and outline a staged agenda toward trustworthy, deployable, and certifiable learning-enabled CPS.

Thu 29 OctRobotics
The gist
Learning-enabled cyber-physical systems like self-driving cars use AI models but currently have incomplete methods to guarantee overall system safety. The authors suggest combining neural networks with explicit symbolic rules to better control these systems and verify their behavior. They propose a framework that uses testing, formal checks, and runtime monitoring to ensure the system behaves correctly even when AI models are uncertain or unpredictable. This approach helps create stronger safety guarantees across the entire system rather than just judging individual AI parts.
Open → 2610.39547v1

Robot takes surgical tool from surgeon without real training

SimRetract: Zero-Shot Sim-to-Real Robotic Assistance for Retractor Take-Over in Open Surgery

Abstract: We demonstrate the first zero-shot sim-to-real transfer for a surgeon-robot collaboration task in open surgery: retractor take-over. A robot arm takes a retractor from the surgeon's hand and preserves retraction at handoff, using a policy trained only on simulated demonstrations, without human demonstrations or real-world fine-tuning. Imitation learning from real demonstrations is limited by collection and labeling costs, and by performance degradation when the environment changes. Our framework, SimRetract, generates simulated demonstrations designed for transfer: the policy observes masked instrument images and grasp geometry, learns to recover from off-nominal states, and acts with margin for execution drift. Deployed zero-shot, it grasps the retractor in 90% of 50 surgeon-defined phantom presentations and preserves retraction at handoff in 78%. Results on unseen retractors suggest potential for generalization to instruments with similar grasp geometry. Across ten policy configurations and 1,200 simulated and real trials, we localize the sim-to-real gap to components: in simulation, grasp rates across ablations span 80-96%, while on the real robot removing the instrument mask alone drops performance to 22% grasped and 12% held. Transfer-oriented design thus makes zero-shot sim-to-real transfer feasible for a surgical assistance task without human demonstrations. Code is available here: https://anonymous.4open.science/r/simretract-58D2.

Wed 28 OctRobotics
The gist
Taking tools from a surgeon during open surgery is tricky because robots need careful training. This paper shows a robot can learn to take a retractor—a tool that holds open a surgical area—using only computer simulations and then perform the task in real life without extra training. The robot watches masked instrument images and understands how to grasp the tool, even when things aren’t perfect. The authors’ method works well on new retractors, suggesting it could handle similar tools too.
Open → 2610.38234v1

State estimation method improves control of hybrid space robot arms

State estimation for a hybrid rigid-continuum space manipulator system

Abstract: Spacecraft-mounted robotic manipulators can support long-term operability of orbiting assets by conducting tasks such as on-orbit assembly, repair, upgrade, and refueling. In this context, the integration of continuum/soft robotic mechanisms into space manipulator designs promises to reduce stowage volume and mass, as well as to improve operational safety through the inherent mechanical compliance of soft structures. This work presents a novel state reconstruction pipeline for a hybrid soft-rigid space manipulator, in which the distal link is a tendon-driven continuum robot. The estimation problem is formulated as a maximum a posteriori (MAP) inference problem over the hybrid manipulator's configuration, conditioned on discrete, noisy measurements from joint encoders and a vision-based sensing pipeline. The resulting soft-constrained optimization problem is transcribed as a factor graph, providing a compact representation for fusing heterogeneous measurements with the rigid-soft kinematic model. Furthermore, the adoption of the Geometric Variable Strain (GVS) approach yields a minimum-order parameterization of the configuration, a property expected to facilitate model-based feedback control design in future work. The proposed implementation is validated in simulation on a closed-loop trajectory where, for better realism, position measurements for the continuum link are obtained by means of a simulated visual pipeline leveraging synthetic photorealistic images. The state reconstruction accuracy and computational performance confirm the potential of the proposed framework for hybrid soft-rigid robotic applications in orbit.

Tue 27 OctRobotics
The gist
Space robots need to perform complex tasks like repairs and assembly while orbiting Earth. The authors designed a new way to estimate the positions and shapes of a hybrid robot arm that combines rigid parts and a flexible soft segment. They use measurements from joint sensors and cameras, along with a mathematical model, to accurately figure out the robot's state in space. Their method was tested in realistic computer simulations using synthetic images, showing it can provide reliable data for future control systems.
Open → 2610.37043v1

Comparing four reinforcement learning methods for safe autonomous driving

Comprehensive Comparisons of Reinforcement Learning Algorithms in Autonomous Driving

Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive comparison of four representative reinforcement learning (RL) methods in autonomous vehicle (AV) decision-making, including: Fitted Value Iteration (FVI), Rollout Classification Policy Iteration (RCPI), Deep Q-Network (DQN), and a discrete-action adaptation of Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (D-DDPG). The four methods are applied to the same AV decision-making problem at an unsignalized intersection and are compared in terms of optimality and safety, training stability, and training and decision cost. RCPI is the closest to a reference solution and has the most stable training process. However, it is the least data-efficient. D-DDPG reaches the second-smallest gap to a reference solution with the highest data efficiency, but has the least training stability. DQN is the most stable model-free method but has the highest collision rate. FVI achieves a lower collision rate than DQN, but is less data-efficient and less stable. Based on these results, we provide suggestions for selecting a method according to whether a model is available, the budget for training, and whether stable training is required.

Wed 14 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Making self-driving cars decide safely and well is complicated, so the authors studied four computer learning methods for this task at an intersection without traffic lights. They measured how good and safe the decisions were, how steady the training process was, and how much time and data each method needed. One method called RCPI was the safest and most steady but needed lots of training data. Another, D-DDPG, used data efficiently but was unstable during training. These findings help choose the right method based on available information, training budget, and stability needs.
Open → 2610.19429v1

Caster aware control improves robot motion in tight turns

MSC: Multi-Stage Caster-aware Control Framework with Uncertainty-Aware NMPC and RL-based Execution Layer

Abstract: Freely swiveling casters are widely adopted in industrial AMRs/SDVs for their mechanical simplicity and load capacity. However, caster misalignment during low-speed or high-curvature maneuvers induces strong contact nonlinearities, widening the planning-execution gap between commanded $(v, ω)$ and realized motion. Existing caster-aware strategies are highly sensitive to state-estimation reliability, causing unstable execution in uncertain transition regimes. To address this, we present Multi-Stage Caster-aware Control (MSC), a planning-execution integrated hierarchical framework featuring two core mechanisms. First, an uncertainty-aware NMPC (CU-MPC) dynamically schedules caster-aware costs and input regularization using predictive uncertainty to suppress overly aggressive maneuvers. Second, a reinforcement learning-based execution layer estimates and predicts caster states under partial observability, transforming high-level velocity commands into physically executable wheel speeds adapted to current contact conditions. Validations in Isaac Sim and real robots demonstrate that MSC offers a clear comparative advantage over existing decoupled compensation approaches by significantly improving caster-state estimation accuracy, minimizing misalignment, and enhancing tracking robustness in caster-sensitive maneuvers.

Mon 12 OctRoboticsMachine Learning
The gist
Swiveling casters on robots make turning and carrying loads easier, but sometimes the wheels don’t line up right, causing jerky or inaccurate movement. The authors developed a new control system called MSC that acts in two stages to handle this problem better: first by predicting and adjusting for uncertain wheel positions when planning moves, and second by using a learning method to convert commands into wheel speeds that fit actual contact conditions. They tested this system both in simulation and on real robots, showing it keeps movements smoother and more accurate during tricky maneuvers.
Open → 2610.16199v1

Vision tactile sensor detects object rotation accurately in varying gravity

A Minimal Optical-Flow Representation for Vision-Based Tactile Rotation Classification in Robotic Manipulation Across Gravity Domains

Abstract: Vision-based tactile sensors provide rich contact information, but processing high-resolution images can be costly for resource-constrained platforms such as space robots. This work investigates whether a compact representation of tactile motion can classify object rotation across different gravity conditions. Dense optical flow from a simulated GelSight Mini is aggregated over a 7x9 grid into 126 features and used to classify the direction of load-induced rotation under Earth, Mars, Moon, and orbital gravity. Gravity causes a small but significant shift in these features, accounting for 1.6% of their variance (R2 = 0.016). Despite its small magnitude, this shift affects models trained only on Earth data: XGBoost accuracy decreases from 94.4% on Earth to 75.9% in orbit. In contrast, a single model trained across all four gravity domains achieves 96.3% overall accuracy and 95.1%-97.0% across individual domains, without using gravity as an input. The representation can also be reduced to 40 features while retaining 95.7% accuracy, with XGBoost requiring only 0.14 ms per inference. These findings show that Earth-gravity performance alone is insufficient to establish the transferability of tactile perception for space robotic manipulation, highlighting the need to account for gravity-induced domain shifts during training and validation.

Thu 8 OctRoboticsComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Tactile sensors that use vision can tell how objects rotate when touched, but their detailed image data is heavy to process, especially in space robots with limited computing power. The authors studied a smaller set of motion features derived from optical flow in these sensors to classify object rotation across different gravity levels—Earth, Mars, Moon, and orbit. They found that gravity changes the sensor features slightly, enough to hurt accuracy if the model only trains on Earth data. Training on multiple gravity environments fixes this, making tactile rotation detection reliable across gravity levels.
Open → 2610.12073v1

Human feedback timing improves robot safety in human collaboration

A Scoping Review and Experimental Study on Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback for Human-Robot Collaboration

Abstract: Human-Robot Collaboration (HRC) can facilitate mass customisation in Industry 4.0, with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) representing a promising approach for developing safe AI-based robots. Practical challenges remain regarding safety during AI development, human feedback quality, and bidirectional human-robot adaptation. We conducted a scoping review of RLHF in HRC systems, mapping methods that address these challenges. Following PRISMA guidelines, we screened 199 records and included 20 peer-reviewed publications (2020-2025) spanning multiple HRC domains. To our knowledge, this is the first review focused on the bidirectional, closed-loop design of RLHF. Our review found multiple feedback modalities enabling data collection in various feedback formats. Collected data can be integrated at different stages of AI training, resulting in a multi-step development process. Pilot experiments are commonly used to evaluate HRC systems based on both human and robot metrics. To empirically test a key gap identified in the review, we conducted a between-subjects VR experiment comparing system- and user-initiated feedback on robot proxemic behaviour for safe navigation. Using Bayesian models, we analysed the relation between the collected feedback and safety metrics: psychological safety (post-experiment questionnaire) and physical safety (inverse time-to-collision). Results show that user-initiated feedback captures perceived safety better than system-initiated feedback, indicating that feedback timing directly affects feedback quality. Our review and experiment findings show that RLHF relies on appropriate feedback methods to ensure AI safety in HRC, and future RLHF research should prioritise realistic HRC experiments evaluating the effects of feedback collection methods on relevant human and robot metrics.

Wed 7 OctHuman-Computer InteractionArtificial IntelligenceRobotics
The gist
Working safely with robots is a challenge, especially when robots learn from people. The authors looked at many studies about teaching robots using human feedback during teamwork. They found that the way and timing people give their feedback really matters. In their own experiment, feedback given by users themselves helped robots behave more safely than feedback given automatically by the system. This shows that careful design of feedback methods can make robots safer and more trusted in shared tasks.
Open → 2610.09891v1

Multimodal mapping improves construction robot navigation safety

Robust 2D Traversability Mapping for Construction AMRs via Failure-Mode-Aware Fusion of LiDAR Geometry and Monocular Semantics

Abstract: Autonomous Mobile Robots (AMRs) on active construction sites face severe navigational challenges: geometry-based traversability mapping (e.g., LiDAR) misses visually hazardous but geometrically flat surfaces like wet mud and ponding concrete, while abrupt geometry on drivable speed-breakers and inclines produces phantom obstacles. We propose a real-time, failure-mode-aware multimodal traversability pipeline on an NVIDIA Jetson AGX Orin, where LiDAR is the primary geometric safety estimate and monocular semantics act as a selective, class- and confidence-gated corrective signal. The representation retains distinct traversable classes, namely flat road, terrain, and rocky terrain, while flagging construction hazards. We also release a multimodal construction-site dataset from a custom AMR: four closed-loop ROS 2 sequences from two active sites (RGB, depth, LiDAR, IMU, GPS-RTK, odometry) plus 506 annotated frames across 28 semantic classes. By projecting LiDAR onto dense semantic masks, resolving sparsity via morphological in-painting, and applying failure-mode-aware fusion with Patchwork++, the system corrects complementary geometric failure modes for a local AMR costmap.

Sun 4 OctRoboticsComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Mobile robots working on construction sites have trouble navigating because some dangerous areas look flat but are unsafe, like wet mud, while some safe features like speed bumps look like obstacles to them. The authors created a system that uses laser sensors to map shapes and a camera to recognize materials, combining both to better tell safe from unsafe ground. This helps robots avoid hazards they couldn't detect before. They also provide a new dataset to help improve navigation in construction sites.
Open → 2610.05505v1

Vision language action models improve task understanding beyond appearance changes

Beyond Appearance Shifts: Task-Semantic Action Calibration for VLA Models

Abstract: Vision-language-action (VLA) models have achieved strong performance in embodied manipulation, but still lack a clear mechanism to balance behavioral stability with task-semantic sensitivity. We identify two complementary failure modes. Under task-preserving changes, where task semantics remain unchanged but scene appearance varies (e.g., style, illumination, clutter, or paraphrasing), policies often exhibit unnecessary action drift. Conversely, under semantic-breaking changes, where key task semantics such as the target object or constraint are altered, policies frequently fail to produce sufficiently distinct behaviors and instead follow the original trajectory. To address this gap, we propose BAS-VLA, a task-semantic action calibration framework built on top of a frozen base VLA. BAS-VLA adopts a breaking-centered calibration core as the default path, and introduces a selective evidence-gated preserving auxiliary that activates only when nuisance variation is detected while task semantics remain consistent. On the OpenPI-pi0.5 / LIBERO-Object Milk-Swap benchmark, BAS-VLA maintains high success on clean (98.0%) and semantics-preserving conditions (97.5%), while reducing clean-criterion success to 0.0% under deliberate target-object swaps, demonstrating strong stale-task suppression and task-semantic separation. On validated style-preserving shifts, it improves success from 42% to 70% without degrading clean performance. These results highlight that reliable VLA behavior requires moving beyond appearance robustness toward explicit task-semantic action calibration.

Sun 20 SeptRoboticsMachine Learning
The gist
Vision-language-action (VLA) models help robots understand and perform tasks by looking at scenes and reading instructions. The authors found that these models sometimes change their actions unnecessarily when the scene looks different but the task stays the same, or fail to react correctly when the task actually changes. They created a new method called BAS-VLA that fixes these issues by carefully deciding when to adjust the robot’s actions based on whether the task meaning has changed. Their method works better on tests where the scene appearance varies or the task is switched, proving more reliable for task-focused actions.
Open → 2609.23650v1

Robot model predicts motion and stiffness for delicate tasks

CompVLA: A Variable Compliance Vision-Language-Action Model for Contact-rich Manipulation

Abstract: Contact-rich manipulation, requiring robots to regulate not only motion but also how they yield to external forces, has emerged as the next frontier for Vision-Language-Action (VLA) models. However, existing VLAs output purely kinematic commands, degrading performance on real-world contact-rich tasks. In this paper, we introduce CompVLA, a unified VLA framework that jointly predicts motion and stiffness matrix from RGB and language inputs. Our approach augments the conventional architecture with a dedicated Compliance Expert, which outputs time-varying stiffness and virtual displacement profiles executed via geometric impedance control. We demonstrate that CompVLA achieves the highest average success rate across diverse contact-rich tasks, outperforming both vanilla and compliance-aware VLA baselines, with ablations confirming each component is essential.

Sun 20 SeptRobotics
The gist
Robots doing tasks that involve touching and pushing objects need to control both how they move and how much they resist forces. Existing robot systems mostly just decide how to move, which can cause problems with delicate tasks. The authors created CompVLA, a robot model that uses pictures and language instructions to decide both motion and flexibility. This lets the robot handle tasks better and more successfully than previous methods.
Open → 2609.23614v1

Robot planning improved by legal reasoning with uncertainty handling

Legislating World-Model-Based Planning with Legal Reasoning

Abstract: As robotic systems grow more general, legal norms are needed to integrate them into society. This paper extends the isomorphism problem of aligning legal source texts with their encodings, and measures two key challenges to robot normative control: (1) the \textit{grounding isomorphism gap}, where perception error grounds false atoms for legal reasoning, and (2) the \textit{ontological isomorphism gap}, where one legal conclusion admits many faithful translations into planning constraints. The paper introduces a legal planning stack that employs Defeasible Deontic Logic (DDL) to constrain a motion planner. The stack leverages learned world models to plan and to provide legal context, enabling \textit{ex ante} governance that intervenes before an illegal action is executed. It was deployed on a simulated robot arm pushing a cube across a $3\times3$ grid. The findings were (1) the legislated agent abided substantially more often than the non-legislated one, and modeling perception uncertainty lifted abidance even further, (2) the legal reasoning ran efficiently at runtime and its verdicts were auditable, and (3) the stack adapted to exogenous signals and endogenous rule changes. Both gaps were measured: (4) world model and probe error corrupted the factual input for the DDL reasoner, and (5) a single law admitted several faithful metric interpretations yielding drastically different abidance. Thus, \textit{ex ante} legislation functions as intended, and closing these gaps with a standardized mapping from the law to runtime constraints and improved fact grounding from perception will yield robust laws that align robot behavior with society's norms.

Mon 14 SeptRoboticsArtificial IntelligenceLogic in Computer Science
The gist
Robots need rules to behave safely and fairly in human spaces, but it’s hard to turn legal texts into clear instructions for robots. The authors built a system that uses legal logic together with a robot’s learned understanding of the world to plan actions while avoiding rule violations from the start. They tested it on a simulated robot arm moving a cube, showing it followed rules more often and handled perception errors better. Their work highlights challenges in precisely linking laws to robot behaviors but shows a path toward safer, law-abiding robots.
Open → 2609.15113v1

Verification framework improves safety of robot reasoning by 87 percent

CT-SAFR: Safe and Interpretable Chain-of-Thought Reasoning for Autonomous Robots: A Multi-Layered Verification Framework for Trustworthy AI-Driven Robotic Decision Making

Abstract: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting enables LLMs to perform explicit, step-by-step reasoning, creating opportunities for sophisticated autonomous robots. However, recent research reveals that reasoning models verbalize their actual decision processes only 25-39% of the time, with faithfulness degrading 44% on complex tasks. This paper presents CT-SAFR (Chain-of-Thought Safety and Faithfulness for Robotics), a multi-layered verification framework achieving 94.2% hallucination detection (n = 500, 95% CI: 91.8-95.9%) with sub-500ms latency. Through a warehouse robot case study, this work demonstrates 87% reduction in unsafe reasoning outputs (p < 0.001) and provides recommendations for responsible deployment of reasoning-capable autonomous robots.

Wed 9 SeptRoboticsArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Robots that think and explain their decisions step-by-step often don’t tell the full truth, especially on tough tasks. The authors created a system called CT-SAFR that checks these step-by-step explanations quickly and accurately to catch when the robot is making unsafe or made-up reasoning. When tested on a warehouse robot, CT-SAFR reduced unsafe robot decisions by 87%. The authors also suggest ways to use this approach responsibly in real robots.
Open → 2609.09692v1