industrial engineers

Abstract: Open-pit mining operational planning involves allocating limited resources while satisfying production, equipment, and ore-quality requirements. Existing approaches often assume deterministic ore grades or rely on simulation-based evaluation under uncertainty. In this paper, we propose a chance-constrained bi-objective formulation of the open-pit mining operational planning problem under uncertain ore grades. We aim to maximize ore production and minimize fleet cost while satisfying stochastic quality requirements through chance constraints. We model ore grades as independent normally distributed random variables and derive a deterministic reformulation of the two-sided chance constraints, avoiding sampling or simulation during fitness evaluation. We evaluate four multi-objective evolutionary algorithms on benchmark instances under different levels and structures of uncertainty. Our results show that NSGA-II and NSGA-III generally obtain the best feasible ore-production values, with NSGA-II requiring less computational time. GSEMO has the lowest computational cost but obtains feasible solutions less consistently and generally provides lower solution quality. We also observe that higher confidence and uncertainty levels reduce feasibility, with the effect depending on the uncertainty structure. The results highlight the importance of considering both the magnitude and structure of uncertainty in short-term open-pit operational planning.

Abstract: Autonomous agents have made rapid progress in general-purpose computer use, but reliable automation of professional industrial engineering remains out of reach, as engineering workflows demand reasoning over geometric and physical constraints and dependencies preserved across software and design stages. We present EngiWorld, the first benchmark structured around the complete design loop: 1,301 expert-curated tasks spanning 6 engineering domains (CAD, CAE, CAM, BIM, EDA, and 3D visualization) and 26 professional software platforms, with both GUI and CLI interfaces and 6 task types ranging from software-selection to open-ended tasks. We further introduce an artifact-centric evaluation methodology built on a unified domain-verifier suite, which programmatically checks the geometric validity, physical feasibility, and rule compliance of final and intermediate artifacts, and scores quantitative design tasks continuously by specification attainment rather than binary success. Evaluation of seven frontier models reveals a substantial capability gap: the strongest model achieves an EngiScore of only 44.3, and just 3.6% of multi-software attempts succeed. EngiWorld provides the first rigorous foundation for measuring progress toward agents that operate professional engineering software end to end.

Abstract: Recent advances in agentic heuristic design use AI agents and execution feedback to automate algorithm discovery for challenging optimization problems. In many practical settings, high-quality solutions must be obtained under strict runtime constraints, motivating hybrid approaches that combine problem-specific heuristics with powerful mathematical programming solvers. However, existing approaches typically improve heuristic components within predefined procedures or tune solver configurations in isolation. This limits holistic adaptation of where to allocate computation, how to leverage solvers, and how to refine the overall algorithmic structure. To address these limitations, we propose HeurEvo, an automated plan--code--component co-evolution framework that jointly evolves the high-level algorithmic structures, their implementations, and a shared pool of reusable components. A planner determines which algorithmic components to use, how to combine them, and how to allocate runtime across stages, a coder realizes the resulting plan as executable code, while a component evolver updates the shared component pool. Within an island-based evolutionary framework, plans and implementations co-evolve with feedback from an interpreter agent that analyzes execution results and identifies opportunities for improvement. Across diverse combinatorial optimization benchmarks and challenging MIPLIB instances, HeurEvo finds high-quality solutions within tight runtime budgets, often matching or surpassing state-of-the-art optimization solvers given hours or days of computation. On several nonlinear geometry problems such as hexagon packing, it also improves upon the best previously reported results. These results highlight the value of jointly searching over algorithmic structure and implementation for agentic heuristic design.

Abstract: Many real-world optimization problems involve noisy objective evaluations and probabilistic constraints, particularly in the form of joint chance constraints, which are computationally expensive to evaluate. In this work, we propose CR-EA-C, a confidence-driven evolutionary algorithm for solving noisy black-box optimization problems under joint chance constraints. CR-EA-C introduces three key components: (1) analytical feasibility estimation for joint chance constraints, (2) a pairwise statistical ranking mechanism for robust comparison under noise, and (3) a modified infeasibility-driven survival strategy to accelerate convergence. These components enable statistically reliable decision-making while improving the efficiency of function evaluations. The proposed method is evaluated against four recent metaheuristic algorithms under various uncertainty distributions. Furthermore, its practical effectiveness is also assessed on two additional real-world optimization problems and compared with conventional static sampling methods. Experimental results show that CR-EA-C consistently satisfies the prescribed joint chance constraints while achieving competitive objective values overall. This demonstrates that CR-EA-C is an effective general-purpose approach for noisy optimization.