Papers for

industrial automation planners

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Robotics exposure is highest in manual labor jobs and industries

How exposed is work to robotics? Occupational, industry, and geographic measures

Abstract: Exposure indices that map technical capabilities onto occupational abilities have become a standard tool for anticipating how AI may reshape work, but existing measures either cover software AI or proxy robotics through patents and installation data that reflect the industrial robots of past decades. We construct the first abilities-based exposure measures for robotics and physical AI, and the first to span occupations, industries, and geographies. Following the framework of Felten et al. (2018, 2021), we build a robotics capability taxonomy of 16 capabilities in eight domains from 78 academic, industry, and standards sources, use a large language model to score the relatedness of each capability to the 52 ONET work abilities, and aggregate to Robotics Occupational Exposure (ROE) for 774 occupations, Robotics Industry Exposure (RIE) for 250 NAICS industries, and county-level Robotics Geographic Exposure (RGE). We find that robotics exposure concentrates in physically intensive work such as construction, farming, transportation, and production, and in industries such as logging, mining, trucking, and warehousing. Unlike generative-AI exposure, ROE is higher in occupations with lower wages, lower education requirements, and less creative-ability content. Physical collaboration and assistance, terrain-based locomotion, grasping and handling, and task and functional reasoning move the exposure ranking most, yet no single capability carries the index. Because the measures capture technical relatedness rather than readiness, cost, or adoption, they should be read as an upper bound on where physical automation could affect work.

Fri 16 OctRoboticsComputers and Society
The gist
This paper looks at how much different jobs and industries could be affected by robots and physical AI. The authors created a new way to measure how closely robots’ skills match various occupations, industries, and locations. They found that jobs involving physical work like construction, farming, and transportation are most exposed to robotics, especially those with lower pay and education. The measures show where robots could potentially take over tasks but don’t reflect how soon or cheaply this will happen.
Open → 2610.24267v1

End-to-end safe robot navigation maps raw sensors to controls

End-to-End Safe Social Navigation via Multi-Task Reinforcement Learning and Probabilistic Perception

Abstract: Autonomous social navigation requires balancing efficiency, physical safety, and social compliance. Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods provide a viable and effective solution but often rely on unrealistic assumptions, such as the knowledge of humans' position and velocity. In this paper, we introduce JESSI (JAX-based E2E Safe Social Interpretable navigation), a lightweight end-to-end RL framework that maps raw LiDAR scans directly to kinematically feasible control commands. JESSI enhances safety via Dirichlet-parameterized continuous action spaces and deterministic bounding, while an integrated attention-based perception module extracts probabilistic human states for interpretable, socially aware decision-making. Through extensive simulations and real-world deployment on a differential-drive robot, we demonstrate that jointly optimizing the RL policy with a supervised perception signal in a multi-task paradigm enhances social behavior. Ultimately, JESSI is able to balance high navigation success rates and superior social behaviors compared to state-of-the-art baselines.

Mon 5 OctRoboticsHuman-Computer Interaction
The gist
Navigating safely around people is hard for robots because it requires understanding where people are and how to move without causing accidents or discomfort. The authors created a new system called JESSI that lets a robot use raw sensor data like LiDAR to directly decide its movements while paying attention to people’s presence and behavior. This approach combines learning to perceive and act together, allowing robots to move efficiently and safely in social spaces. The authors tested it in simulations and on a real robot, showing better success and social awareness than other methods.
Open → 2610.05733v1

Two-machine flow scheduling with downtime approximation and limits

Two-Machine Flow Shop with a Fixed Non-Availability Interval on the Second Machine

Abstract: This paper investigates a two-machine permutation flow shop in which the second machine is unavailable during one fixed interval $[s,t]$. We consider the non-resumable setting: an operation interrupted by the interval must restart from the beginning after the machine becomes available. The objective is to minimize the makespan. We establish three results. First, we give a polynomial-time $10/7$-approximation algorithm. Second, we develop a pseudopolynomial-time exact dynamic program. Third, we prove that the problem does not admit a fully polynomial-time approximation scheme (FPTAS) unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$, even when the non-availability interval has unit length. Together, these results characterize a distinctive complexity profile: exact optimization is possible in pseudopolynomial time, whereas the usual route from such an algorithm to an FPTAS is impossible unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$. They also reveal an approximability separation from the corresponding non-resumable problem with the interval on the first machine.

Sat 12 SeptDiscrete Mathematics
The gist
This work looks at a job scheduling problem where two machines work in order but the second machine is unavailable during a fixed time period. If a job is interrupted during that downtime, it has to start again when the machine is ready. The authors provide an approximation method that runs quickly and also an exact method that takes longer but finds the best schedule. They also prove it's impossible to find an efficient algorithm that always gets arbitrarily close to the best solution unless a major computer science question is resolved.
Open → 2609.14033v1