Papers for

hospital radiology departments

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Breast cancer risk prediction improves using aligned multi-view screening histories

Explicitly Aligned Multi-View Breast Cancer Risk Prediction from Variable-Length Screening Histories

Abstract: Accurate breast cancer risk prediction from screening mammography is essential for improved risk stratification and personalized screening. It can benefit from both temporal breast tissue changes across longitudinal examinations and complementary anatomical information from craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views. Leveraging longitudinal information requires identifying corresponding tissue regions across examinations, yet most approaches rely on implicit feature alignment without explicitly enforcing spatial consistency. Recent work has demonstrated the benefits of explicit temporal alignment; however, existing methods model each view independently, preventing them from exploiting complementary CC and MLO information. Furthermore, explicit approaches have been limited to a single prior examination. To fill these gaps, we propose (github.com/sot176/FlexLMV-Net), a breast-wise longitudinal multi-view framework that jointly models CC and MLO views across screening examinations while accommodating a variable number of prior examinations. FlexLMV-Net explicitly aligns longitudinal feature maps and integrates complementary views through cross-view temporal fusion and a dual-stream attention block. Evaluated on EMBED and CSAW-CC, FlexLMV-Net consistently outperforms existing approaches across breast density, cancer subtypes, and demographic subgroups, highlighting the benefits of explicit longitudinal alignment, multi-view modeling, and flexible use of available screening history. We further introduce (github.com/sot176/BCRBench), an open-source benchmark that unifies state-of-the-art single- and multi-timepoint breast cancer risk prediction models under standardized preprocessing, training, inference, and evaluation protocols, enabling fair and reproducible comparison of existing methods.

Mon 12 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Predicting breast cancer risk from mammograms can be better if we look at how breast tissue changes over time and use images taken from different angles. The authors created a method that matches the same breast areas across multiple past exams and combines the two key image views to get more accurate predictions. Their approach works even if the number of past exams varies and outperforms older methods in tests on real data. They also released software to fairly compare different breast cancer risk prediction techniques.
Open → 2610.16329v1

Dual AI suggestions improve radiology resident accuracy on X-rays

Dual- versus Single-Suggestion AI Support for Radiographic Interpretation in Residents: Randomized Multireader Study

Abstract: Purpose: To compare dual- and single-suggestion AI support for radiographic interpretation by residents, particularly when the shared AI suggestion was incorrect. Materials and Methods: This prospective, multicenter, randomized three-arm reader study was conducted at three hospitals in China from July to September 2026 (ChiCTR2600129243). After specialty stratification, 132 residents with fewer than 3 years of clinical experience were randomized 1:1:1 to GPT-5.4 alone (group A), GPT-5.4 plus Kimi-K2.6 (group B), or GPT-5.4 plus Gemini-3.6 Flash (group C); 123 were analyzed. Participants interpreted 60 radiographs before and after AI support. The primary outcome was accuracy change. Welch ANOVA and Holm-adjusted t tests compared support conditions; HC3 linear models assessed specialty interaction. Results: Among 123 residents (mean age, 24.1 years +/- 1.4; 65 women), radiology residents showed greater accuracy improvement with dual- than single-suggestion support (B-A, 6.69 percentage points [95% CI, 0.97-12.40]; C-A, 7.87 percentage points [95% CI, 1.64-14.11]; Holm-adjusted P = .030 for both), whereas accuracy change did not differ in non-radiology residents (P = .20). When GPT-5.4 was incorrect, AI-assisted accuracy was higher with dual- than single-suggestion support in radiology residents (40.1% and 40.4% vs 20.0%) and non-radiology residents (31.3% and 31.0% vs 12.1%) (all Holm-adjusted P < .001). The dual-suggestion effect differed by specialty (interaction difference, 10.44 percentage points; 95% CI, 4.36-16.52; P < .001). Conclusion: Dual-suggestion support may mitigate the influence of erroneous AI suggestions, with greater accuracy improvement observed in radiology but not non-radiology residents.

Wed 7 OctArtificial IntelligenceComputers and Society
The gist
Reading X-rays is tricky, especially for new doctors still learning. The authors studied if AI tools that give two different guesses about what an X-ray shows help beginners do better than AIs that give only one guess. They found that for radiology trainees, having two AI suggestions helped them get the right answer more often, especially when one AI was wrong. But for doctors not specialized in radiology, having two suggestions didn’t make a difference. This means using two AI opinions might help trainees avoid mistakes.
Open → 2610.09589v1

Cranial nerve imaging dataset and network improve nerve identification

CNsEMD: An Expert-Annotated Multi-Field-Strength MRI Dataset and a Hyperspherical Manifold Network for Multimodal Cranial Nerve Parcellation

Abstract: Cranial nerves (CNs) play essential roles in sensory, motor, and autonomic functions. Accurate CN parcellation from multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is crucial for neuroanatomical analysis and neurosurgical planning. However, accurate CN parcellation remains extremely challenging because CNs are very small, exhibit low image contrast, and have slender tubular morphologies and complex anatomical trajectories. Moreover, the lack of publicly available, expert-annotated datasets has impeded the development and fair benchmarking of learning-based CN analysis methods. In this work, we introduce CNsEMD, an expert-annotated multimodal dataset for CN parcellation. It comprises data from 202 subjects acquired on 3T, 5T, and 7T MRI scanners. We further propose the projective hyperspherical manifold network (PHM-Net), which learns cross-modal representations by capturing angular relationships in a shared hyperspherical embedding space. Rather than performing multimodal fusion in Euclidean space, the proposed Hyperspherical cross-modal interaction (HCI) module enables bidirectional feature exchange between T1-weighted (T1w) and direction-encoded color (DEC) representations on a unit hypersphere. The Magnitude-preserving projective hyperspherical orientation representation (PHOR) captures the axial nature of DEC orientations while preserving diffusion magnitude. The hyperspherical prototype segmentation head (HPSH) further extends angular similarity to voxel-wise classification using normalized voxel embeddings and learnable class prototypes. Extensive experimental results on the CNsEMD dataset demonstrate the effectiveness of our PHM-Net against state-of-the-art methods. CNsEMD establishes a reproducible benchmark for multimodal CN imaging, while PHM-Net provides a geometry-consistent solution for CN parcellation across diverse MRI acquisitions.

Mon 7 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Cranial nerves are tiny and tricky to see in brain scans, but knowing their exact locations is very important for surgery and brain studies. The authors created a new, carefully labeled set of MRI images from many people and different MRI machines to help computers learn to find these nerves better. They also designed a special computer model that understands differences between types of images in a new way, helping it identify nerve locations more accurately. Tests showed this model works better than earlier methods, providing a reliable tool for studying these nerves.
Open → 2609.07058v1