Papers for

home automation integrators

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

ItemCompass helps find misplaced household objects with wearable AI

ItemCompass: Real-Time Edge-AI Wearable Vision for Tag-Free Domestic Object Retrieval

Abstract: Misplacing household objects disrupts daily routines, especially for elderly users. ItemCompass addresses this with a real-time, tag-free wearable AR system that builds a persistent digital twin of the home for natural language object retrieval. A custom eyewear node streams visual and inertial data to an edge server, where YOLOv11n detection, Siamese re-identification, and a Pedestrian Dead Reckoning engine log object locations as Spatial Anchors in InfluxDB. Voice queries are resolved by a local Faster-Whisper and Qwen2 LLM pipeline, delivering concise spoken and AR guidance on a heads-up display. Evaluation shows 0.40 m localization drift, 97.5% step precision, and mAP@0.5 of 0.874, with users rating Accuracy and Trust at 4.6/5.0. The system highlights always-on sensing, conversational spatial memory, and privacy-by-design for wearable computing.

Wed 28 OctHuman-Computer Interaction
The gist
Losing everyday things at home, especially for older people, is frustrating. The authors created ItemCompass, a smart pair of glasses that recognize and remember objects without needing tags. It listens to your voice and guides you to lost items using augmented reality. Their tests show the system is accurate and trusted by users while protecting privacy.
Open → 2610.38629v1

Localintent enhances smart building automation outcomes with local llms

LocalIntent: Outcome-Specific Structured Generation for Backend-Compatible Smart Building Automation with Local LLMs

Abstract: Locally deployed large language models (LLMs) can reduce reliance on remote cloud services for natural language smart building automation, but backend-facing processing requires correct outcome selection, alignment with local capabilities, and valid structured outputs. We investigate whether a complete outcome-specific prompting design improves compact-model outputs beyond generic route-then-generate prompting. The proposed LocalIntent approach routes requests to ordinary or persistent-rule branches: the former produces commands, clarifications, or rejections, while the latter generates trigger-action rules, followed by deterministic validation. We evaluate four locally executed Gemma and Qwen models spanning 2B-9B parameters on 101 non-persistent and 54 persistent-rule records, comparing Monolithic prompting, generic two-stage prompting, LocalIntent, and validation-guided repair. Across the evaluated datasets, LocalIntent achieves higher intent understanding, device identification, and action/parameter correctness than generic two-stage prompting, while clarification/mode correctness remains model-dependent. The largest gains occur for rules, where LocalIntent improves intent understanding from 26.4% to 80.6%, device identification from 59.3% to 84.7%, rule-mode correctness from 49.1% to 98.6%, and action/parameter correctness from 5.6% to 44.9%. For non-persistent requests, pooled gains are smaller: intent understanding increases from 39.6% to 53.2%, and action/parameter correctness from 30.7% to 42.8%.

Fri 16 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Smart building systems need to understand and act on voice or text commands correctly. The authors studied a way to improve how small local language models handle these commands by tailoring prompts depending on the type of task. Their method, LocalIntent, helps the system better understand instructions, pick the right devices, and generate valid actions, especially for complex rule-based commands. This means smarter buildings can run more reliably without sending data to cloud servers.
Open → 2610.23511v1

Smart home agents improved for better failure handling and control

Increasing Resilience of Smart Home Agents

Abstract: Smart homes and smart devices are becoming more prevalent across millions of homes around the world. With the rise of AI, the smart home industry is quickly increasing its integration to manage common smart home tasks. However, existing work in large language models (LLMs) as agents within smart homes have shown minimal resilience due to limited environment scenarios or poor performance in complex tasks. We explore several strategies for LLMs as agents within the popular open-source software (OSS) smart home automation framework HomeAssistant to increase overall smart home resilience. Our approach combines traditional supervised learning techniques and optimized prompting as the core learning process. We use a diverse set of LLMs covering different levels of reasoning and costs in our optimization pipeline and evaluate their performance on a subset of the hardest tasks in a smart home benchmark. We include ReAct and Reflexion agentic paradigms and reveal how both provide marginal return on investment compared to fine-tuned LLMs for multi-device control within HomeAssistant but show promise in resilience tasks such as failure response.

Sun 4 OctMultiagent Systems
The gist
Smart homes use AI to control devices and manage tasks automatically, but current AI helpers often struggle with tricky or unexpected situations. The authors looked at using large language models (LLMs), a kind of AI that understands and generates text, inside a popular smart home platform called HomeAssistant. They tested different ways to train and guide these AIs to handle hard tasks and recover from mistakes more reliably. Their results show that fine-tuning these models works best for controlling many devices, while newer AI strategies help in dealing with failures.
Open → 2610.04923v1