healthcare decision teams

Abstract: Many decision-making tasks are inherently multi-objective. Interactive evolutionary multi-objective optimization algorithms (iEMOAs) are particularly well-suited to help the decision-maker find their most preferred solution. However, many of these algorithms employ black-box preference models. For high-stakes decision-making tasks, like healthcare and defense, a high level of transparency is needed, for instance to support accountability. We propose an interpretable iEMOA which uses active learning to efficiently learn a tree-based preference model directly from pairwise comparisons. The survival operator of NSGA-II and NSGA-III is extended with the learned preference model to guide the algorithm towards the region of interest. An extensive experimental study compares the proposed method to a state-of-the-art black-box model and a state-of-the-art interpretable model. Results indicate that our proposed model outperforms the alternatives in terms of finding the most preferred solution at the cost of a slightly worse average final population. Finally, a case study on a real-life engineering problem illustrates how inspecting the learned model reveals which objectives drive the decision-maker's preferences.

Abstract: In this study, we propose a novel rule-based interpretable choice model, Logic-Logit, designed to effectively learn and explain human choices. Choice models have been widely applied across various domains---such as commercial demand forecasting, recommendation systems, and consumer behavior analysis---typically categorized as parametric, nonparametric, or deep network-based. While recent innovations have favored neural network approaches for their computational power, these flexible models often involve large parameter sets and lack interpretability, limiting their effectiveness in contexts where transparency is essential. Previous empirical evidence shows that individuals usually use heuristic decision rules to form their consideration sets, from which they then choose. These rules are often represented as disjunctions of conjunctions (i.e., OR-of-ANDs). These rules-driven, consider-then-choose decision processes enable people to quickly screen numerous alternatives while reducing cognitive and search costs. Motivated by this insight, our approach leverages logic rules to elucidate human choices, providing a fresh perspective on preference modeling. We introduce a unique combination of column generation techniques and the Frank-Wolfe algorithm to facilitate efficient rule extraction for preference modeling---a process recognized as NP-hard. Our empirical evaluation, conducted on both synthetic datasets and real-world data from commercial and healthcare domains, demonstrates that Logic-Logit significantly outperforms baseline models in terms of interpretability and accuracy.