Papers for
geospatial data platform developers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Cross-scale sparse attention improves remote sensing image segmentation
Cross-Scale Sparse Attention for Referring Segmentation in Remote Sensing
Abstract: High-resolution remote sensing (RS) imagery provides fine spatial detail over large areas, making it essential for fine-grained scene understanding. Referring Remote Sensing Image Segmentation (RRSIS) aims to segment regions described by natural language, yet many existing methods rely on sequential alignment--fusion pipelines with limited joint modeling of cross-scale visual hierarchies and linguistic dependencies. Moreover, dense attention mechanisms struggle with the sparsity and wide spatial dispersion of RS targets, while current datasets offer limited structured evaluation of multi-target references, multi-hop relational reasoning, and multi-granularity descriptions, limiting both model development and evaluation. To address these challenges, we propose a Cross-Scale Sparse Attention Model (CSSAM), which aligns multiscale visual features with complex referring expressions through two key modules. The Cross-scale Modality-aligned Fusion Module (CMFM) performs unified cross-scale cross-modal fusion, while the Dynamic Multimodal Sparse Hybrid Attention (DMSHA) selectively attends to informative visual--textual tokens, reducing dense visual interactions. Furthermore, we introduce M$^{3}$RRSIS-D, a RRSIS dataset explicitly designed around three core reasoning dimensions: multi-target (M$^{1}$), reference-dependent multi-hop (M$^{2}$), and multi-granularity (M$^{3}$) expressions. Extensive experiments on M$^{3}$RRSIS-D and two public RRSIS benchmarks demonstrate that CSSAM achieves competitive performance across accuracy, fine-grained reasoning, and high-IoU localization metrics, validating its effectiveness for complex semantic reasoning in realistic RS scenarios. Code, dataset, and model weights will be released upon acceptance.
Satellite images contain fewer independent samples than pixel count suggests
How Many Independent Samples Does a Satellite Image Contain? Generalization Bounds for Spatially Dependent Data
Abstract: Machine learning classifiers for remote sensing imagery are typically evaluated as though every pixel were an independent sample. Spatial autocorrelation violates this assumption, since neighboring pixels carry redundant information which inflates sample sizes. How many independent samples does a satellite image actually contain? For an $n \times n$ image whose spatial correlation persists over a range of $r$ pixels, the effective sample size is $Θ(n^2/r^2)$, not $n^2$. We prove this as a finite-sample upper bound for classifiers on spatially correlated data, and show via a matching lower bound that the rate is tight, and no algorithm can do better. We extend the results to images with directional correlation and spatially varying correlation structure. Our result justifies spatial cross-validation since block holdout with separation proportional to the correlation range achieves optimal generalization guarantees, while random holdout can underestimate confidence interval widths by a factor proportional to $r$. We validate the theory on synthetic data and satellite image tiles from three sensors (Landsat 8, Sentinel-2, and Sentinel-1).