Papers for

geospatial data platform developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Cross-scale sparse attention improves remote sensing image segmentation

Cross-Scale Sparse Attention for Referring Segmentation in Remote Sensing

Abstract: High-resolution remote sensing (RS) imagery provides fine spatial detail over large areas, making it essential for fine-grained scene understanding. Referring Remote Sensing Image Segmentation (RRSIS) aims to segment regions described by natural language, yet many existing methods rely on sequential alignment--fusion pipelines with limited joint modeling of cross-scale visual hierarchies and linguistic dependencies. Moreover, dense attention mechanisms struggle with the sparsity and wide spatial dispersion of RS targets, while current datasets offer limited structured evaluation of multi-target references, multi-hop relational reasoning, and multi-granularity descriptions, limiting both model development and evaluation. To address these challenges, we propose a Cross-Scale Sparse Attention Model (CSSAM), which aligns multiscale visual features with complex referring expressions through two key modules. The Cross-scale Modality-aligned Fusion Module (CMFM) performs unified cross-scale cross-modal fusion, while the Dynamic Multimodal Sparse Hybrid Attention (DMSHA) selectively attends to informative visual--textual tokens, reducing dense visual interactions. Furthermore, we introduce M$^{3}$RRSIS-D, a RRSIS dataset explicitly designed around three core reasoning dimensions: multi-target (M$^{1}$), reference-dependent multi-hop (M$^{2}$), and multi-granularity (M$^{3}$) expressions. Extensive experiments on M$^{3}$RRSIS-D and two public RRSIS benchmarks demonstrate that CSSAM achieves competitive performance across accuracy, fine-grained reasoning, and high-IoU localization metrics, validating its effectiveness for complex semantic reasoning in realistic RS scenarios. Code, dataset, and model weights will be released upon acceptance.

Sat 24 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
High-resolution satellite images have lots of details but are hard to analyze when describing specific areas using natural language. The authors propose a new method called CSSAM that better connects multiple image scales with complex language by focusing only on the most important visual and text information. They also introduce a new dataset to test how well models understand multiple targets, relationships, and different detail levels in descriptions. Their experiments show this approach works well for accurately locating and reasoning about complex areas in satellite images.
Open → 2610.33551v1

Satellite images contain fewer independent samples than pixel count suggests

How Many Independent Samples Does a Satellite Image Contain? Generalization Bounds for Spatially Dependent Data

Abstract: Machine learning classifiers for remote sensing imagery are typically evaluated as though every pixel were an independent sample. Spatial autocorrelation violates this assumption, since neighboring pixels carry redundant information which inflates sample sizes. How many independent samples does a satellite image actually contain? For an $n \times n$ image whose spatial correlation persists over a range of $r$ pixels, the effective sample size is $Θ(n^2/r^2)$, not $n^2$. We prove this as a finite-sample upper bound for classifiers on spatially correlated data, and show via a matching lower bound that the rate is tight, and no algorithm can do better. We extend the results to images with directional correlation and spatially varying correlation structure. Our result justifies spatial cross-validation since block holdout with separation proportional to the correlation range achieves optimal generalization guarantees, while random holdout can underestimate confidence interval widths by a factor proportional to $r$. We validate the theory on synthetic data and satellite image tiles from three sensors (Landsat 8, Sentinel-2, and Sentinel-1).

Tue 6 OctComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionMachine Learning
The gist
When using satellite images for machine learning, people often treat every pixel as a separate data point. The authors show that because nearby pixels tend to be similar, the actual number of independent data points is much lower. They prove mathematically how the size of this effect depends on the image size and how far spatial correlation extends. Their results help improve the way algorithms are tested to better reflect real accuracy and confidence.
Open → 2610.08227v1