Papers for

geospatial analysts

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Efficiently exploring safely in reinforcement learning with new estimator

Computationally efficient safe exploration in reinforcement learning

Abstract: Reinforcement learning in real-life applications requires safety guarantees during exploration. Typical reinforcement learning algorithms do not provide such guarantees, and many modifications that do rely on Gaussian processes (GPs), which have a large computational cost. We propose a computationally lightweight algorithm based on the Nadaraya-Watson estimator that safely explores and optimizes constrained Markov decision processes (MDPs). Our algorithm, \textsc{CoLSafe-MDP}, uses an estimator that scales in constant-time with bounds on the estimates, a significant improvement from its GP-based counterparts that scale cubically with the number of data points. We then evaluate its performance in a grid-based environment and on observational Martian terrain data.

Sat 19 SeptMachine LearningRobotics
The gist
Reinforcement learning teaches computers to make choices, but trying new things can be risky in real life. The authors created a new method that helps the computer explore safely while learning, using a smart way to estimate outcomes that is faster and needs less computing power than previous methods. They tested this in a simple grid world and on data from Mars terrain, showing it works well without heavy calculations.
Open 2609.22919v1

SatOV improves remote sensing image segmentation using spatial restoration

SatOV: Restoring Spatial Priors for Training-Free Open-Vocabulary Segmentation in Remote Sensing Imagery

Abstract: Open-vocabulary semantic segmentation (OVS) of remote sensing imagery is a challenging pixel-level task requiring strong generalization and adaptation to the spatial characteristics of remote sensing data. Although existing vision-language foundation models perform well in general domains, their image-level classification design weakens the spatial priors needed for high-resolution remote sensing segmentation: structural spatial relations are degraded during deep feature transformation, and fine-grained spatial details are lost during downsampling. To address these complementary deficiencies, we propose SatOV, a training-free framework for open-vocabulary remote sensing segmentation that restores spatial priors at two stages of the representation pipeline. Specifically, Residual QQ Attention (ResQQ) extracts Query-Key self-attention from an intermediate CLIP layer and fuses it with final-layer Query-Query attention via a residual combination, restoring structural spatial priors suppressed by the final-layer representation. Spatially Modulated Upsampling (SatUp) uses the original high-resolution RGB image as spatial guidance, combining spatial feature modulation with guided cross-attention to reconstruct pixel-level textures and boundaries. Extensive experiments on DOTA, UDD, LoveDA, and Vaihingen show that SatOV consistently improves training-free OVS and achieves competitive quantitative and qualitative results against state-of-the-art methods. These results validate the effectiveness of restoring spatial priors at both the representation and spatial-resolution stages for remote sensing open-vocabulary segmentation.

Sat 19 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Segmenting images from satellites is hard because these images need detailed understanding of spatial information that regular image models miss. The authors created SatOV, a method that restores important spatial details lost in typical models without needing training. They do this by combining attention from different layers and using the original high-resolution image to guide finer details. Tested on several remote sensing datasets, SatOV performs better than existing training-free methods and competes well with top approaches.
Open 2609.22834v1

Quadtree sequences improve pixel-level change detection in satellite images

From Pixels to Hierarchical Sequences: Quadtree Mask Encoding for Vision-Language Binary Change Detection

Abstract: Dense change detection in remote sensing requires vision-language models (VLMs) to compare bi-temporal images and generate accurate pixel-level masks. Existing VLMs are largely confined to change captioning outputs, and the few that produce pixel-level masks still rely on external decoders or flat text-as-mask serialization, which are less effective for small and fragmented changes. We introduce QUAKE-CD, a framework that recasts dense change prediction as syntax-verifiable structured generation. QUAKE-CD represents binary change masks as grammar-constrained quadtree token sequences, making the masks compact, syntactically checkable, and deterministically decodable within an autoregressive generation space. We further construct QUAKE-CoT, which pairs these sequences with chain-of-thought traces grounded in visual evidence, and jointly optimizes textual reasoning and spatial dense prediction through a progressive curriculum followed by grammar-gated dual-reward RL. On QUAKE-CoT, QUAKE-CD achieves 78.31% accumulated F1, outperforming decoder-based and flat text-as-mask VLMs while producing more faithful bi-temporal reasoning.

Wed 9 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Detecting precise changes between two images taken at different times is important but challenging, especially for small or broken-up areas. The authors developed QUAKE-CD, a method that represents changes as compact tree-structured sequences that can be reliably checked and decoded. Their approach works better than existing methods by combining detailed visual clues with step-by-step reasoning. This helps create more accurate maps showing where changes have occurred in remote sensing images.
Open 2609.09876v1

Semi supervised learning struggles with biased spatial data sampling

Semi-Supervised Learning under Spatially Biased Sampling

Abstract: Standard semi-supervised learning (SSL) typically relies on labelled and unlabelled data sharing a common marginal distribution. This assumption is often violated by biased spatial sampling mechanism, when labels are collected under spatially biased or preferential site selection. We treat this marginal mismatch, spatial autocorrelation, and spatial non-stationarity as three distinct mechanisms, varied independently via a labelled-sampling concentration parameter, a spatial length scale, and a non-stationarity strength parameter, and ask how mismatch degrades SSL, whether the cluster and manifold assumptions survive it, and how the resulting failure can be diagnosed. Using a controlled synthetic framework alongside PovertyMap-WILDS, California housing, socio-economic and US air quality monitoring datasets, we systematically vary the degree of mismatch while accounting for spatial autocorrelation and non-stationarity. Through a series of analyses including a segmented-regression changepoint, we show that in the synthetic generator, SSL performance does not degrade gradually but instead exhibits a threshold-like breakdown between approximately 0.71 and 0.77 once distribution mismatch becomes sufficiently severe. We further demonstrate that spatial non-stationarity contributes to performance loss independently of marginal mismatch and that models become increasingly overconfident outside the regions where labels are available. To support practical deployment, we evaluate several distribution-divergence measures as indicators of reliability and introduce a kernel-weighted local divergence metric that provides a more stable estimate of spatial mismatch than a naïve localised approach. These findings provide empirical evidence and diagnostic tools for better documenting the risk of incorporating unlabelled spatial data into semi-supervised learning workflows.

Mon 7 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Semi-supervised learning usually assumes that labelled and unlabelled data come from the same overall pattern. The authors found that when labels come from biased locations in space, this assumption breaks down sharply rather than gradually. They also show that spatial changes in data traits and correlations affect learning independently. Their work introduces ways to detect when this mismatch happens, helping users know when unlabelled spatial data might harm learning performance.
Open 2609.07982v1