Papers for

geophysics engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Graph based differentiable solver improves modeling and inverse problem solving

Automatic Differentiation with Constraints in Forward and Inverse Problems

Abstract: Approximate solutions of partial differential equations (PDEs) on unstructured grids can be represented on a graph. Numerical optimization involving stiff evolutionary and static PDEs often requires solving a large system of equations, which can be treated as a constraint. In this work, we present a fully differentiable graph-based implicit solver that incorporates this constraint. We evaluate its performance across four key tasks: a) linear and nonlinear forward modeling of evolutionary and static problems, b) solving inverse problems to estimate equation coefficients, c) solving inverse problems to estimate the right-hand side, and d) learnable graph coarsening to accelerate forward modeling. The stability and differentiability of our solver enable significant reductions in the complexity of forward modeling while efficiently addressing related inverse problems. These capabilities make it a powerful tool for different physics and engineering applications, in particular for geophysics, where inverse problems are commonly solved in order to reduce the model uncertainty.

Tue 20 OctArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Many scientific and engineering problems can be described using equations that are hard to solve, especially when you want to figure out the unknown parts by working backward from data. The authors created a new computer method that represents these problems on graphs and can automatically compute how changes affect the outcome. This makes it easier and faster to solve both forward problems (predicting what will happen) and inverse problems (finding unknown parameters) while keeping the calculations stable. Their approach can be especially helpful in fields like geophysics, where understanding underground structures depends on solving these tricky problems.
Open → 2610.27888v1

Robust ensemble guidance improves scientific inverse problem reconstructions

Robust Ensemble Guidance for Scientific Inverse Problems

Abstract: Ensemble guidance combines pretrained diffusion priors with black-box forward models to solve inverse problems without differentiating through the physical simulator. However, observation coordinates with large predictive spread or extreme residuals can dominate the ensemble correction, degrading reconstruction accuracy. We show that two simple modifications, weighting and clipping, substantially improve this correction. Our method, Robust Ensemble Guidance (REG), uses ensemble predictive spread to balance observation scales and adaptively clips standardized residuals to limit the influence of extreme discrepancies. Both operations reuse existing particles and forward predictions, requiring no additional denoiser or forward-model evaluations. Under a local linear Gaussian model, we derive conditions for reduced one-step estimation risk, bound the influence of individual observation coordinates, and characterize when these benefits persist with finite ensembles. Experiments on Navier-Stokes inversion, black-hole imaging, and acoustic full-waveform inversion demonstrate improved reconstruction over the underlying ensemble solver. In particular, REG increases black-hole reconstruction PSNR by 6.2-8.2 dB across three observation regimes and reduces Navier-Stokes reconstruction error by 26.4\% in a matched-budget comparison. These findings highlight the importance of observation heterogeneity and residual influence in designing reliable generative solvers for scientific inverse problems.

Sun 4 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Sometimes scientists try to figure out causes from complex effects using computer models, but the math can be tricky and easily thrown off by unusual data points. The authors show that by balancing how different measurements are weighted and cutting down the influence of extreme errors, their method makes these reverse calculations more reliable. This approach works without needing to change the original simulation tools and improves image and data reconstructions in tests like studying black holes and fluid flows. Their method helps handle tricky measurements better, leading to clearer and more accurate results.
Open → 2610.05371v1