game ai developers

Abstract: Social-deduction games such as Werewolf are increasingly used to evaluate LLM agents, but existing evaluations often rely on final game outcomes. We propose a belief-shift evaluation benchmark in Werewolf for analyzing communication skills through belief updating. Using LLM-played games, we annotate suspicion and accusation messages and measure how an observing village-side model's beliefs change after each message. We evaluate 40 open-weight LLM configurations on 1,224 annotated messages. Our results show that larger models better distinguish true wolves from villagers based on game history, but accusations still strongly influence their beliefs. Models become more suspicious of the accused target and less suspicious of the accuser, especially when the accuser is trusted, even if the accuser is wolf-aligned. Larger models better resist accusations from accusers they already distrust. Overall, our findings suggest that current open-weight LLMs up to 120B parameters still struggle to integrate accusation content with source trust in strategic communication. Our benchmark and code are available at https://rlg.iis.sinica.edu.tw/papers/werewolf-accusation-benchmark.

Abstract: Lux AI Season 3 requires agents to act under partial observability, randomized episode level dynamics, and a best of five match structure that rewards both tactical execution and fast adaptation. We present HORIZON, a hierarchical agent that combines symmetry aware spatial perception, dual memory belief tracking, relic centric graph attention, information gain driven exploration, and an opponent conditioned policy mixture. HORIZON separates short horizon control from cross match meta reasoning, while auxiliary belief and world model objectives stabilize learning. Trained with PPO in a large scale JAX simulator, the resulting agent explicitly infers hidden game parameters and opponent style. Experiments show consistent gains in match win rate, episode win rate, adaptation gain, and league rating over strong recurrent and feed forward baselines.

Abstract: The Core is a unique competitive co-evolution algorithm that allows agents to evolve autonomous control without utilizing a traditional fitness function. The agents evolve via local interactions through tournament selection, crossover, and mutation, producing offspring by evolving better controllers. Previous works have shown The Core's ability to evolve agents capable of combat and navigation in the Xpilot video game. This research expands upon that premise by niching agents to specific subsets of the original environment The Core was tested in. Our results demonstrate the niched agents capacity for success over agents niched to the entire system and agents niched to different sub-environments.

Abstract: Cooperative AI agents are evaluated against other AIs, yet human cooperation relies on implicit conventions---shared protocols for reading meaning beyond the literal message---which AI-AI benchmarks may not capture. We propose the \emph{convention gap}, the difference between the failure probability predicted from the literal content of communication and the observed failure rate, as a metric of implicit communication. In the card game Hanabi, the finite deck and deterministic hint constraints make this posterior exactly computable. We replayed about 101,000 play actions from three public datasets of human-human (hanab.live), AI-AI (HOAD), and human-AI (HanabiData) games. The gap was +26.2 percentage points (pp) in human pairs, $-$0.7~pp in AI pairs, and +16.4~pp in human-AI pairs, and was concentrated on plays of cards that had received no hints (+46~pp in human pairs). Within human-AI play, the literal information available to humans was similar across the three AI partners (mean predicted failure 38--41\%), but human failure rates ranged from 14.4\% to 34.4\% and the gap from +24.1 to +6.2~pp; the partner eliciting the largest gap produced the fewest human failures. Game score carried different information: it depended on each corpus's roster composition, whereas the gap separated human from AI play at the agent level. As a known-answer check, Off-Belief Learning agents, whose convention content is controlled by construction, gave a gap of +1.6~pp at the convention-free level, rising monotonically to +21.7~pp. These results suggest that convention compatibility, rather than AI-AI performance, may predict an AI's effectiveness with human partners.

Abstract: The integration of graphs with Goal-Conditioned Hierarchical Reinforcement Learning (GCHRL) has received increasing attention, as graphs naturally encode task hierarchies for effective subgoal sampling. However, existing methods often overlook intrinsic connectivity information, failing to fully leverage the underlying topology for efficient learning. Most graph-based GCHRL methods use the graph as a stochastic sampling tool rather than as an environmental model that encodes connectivity and state-accessibility information. This limitation is particularly acute in quasimetric environments, where the inherent asymmetry of state transitions poses a fundamental challenge to stable policy learning and robust path planning. In this paper, we address these problems by introducing a state connectivity model designed to predict pairwise state connectivity strength in asymmetric environments. We transform these connectivity strengths into scalar auxiliary dense rewards, providing continuous guidance across multiple hierarchical levels. We demonstrate that our proposed framework, Graph-Guided Quasimetric Dense Reward (G2QDR), can theoretically be integrated into any existing GCHRL architecture, and the state connectivity model is efficiently implemented via a neural network trained on a directed state graph generated during exploration. Empirical results across a wide range of sparse reward environments indicate that, in general, G2QDR can enhance the performance of baseline GCHRL approaches with acceptable computational overhead.

Abstract: In continual reinforcement learning, carefully managing the stability-plasticity tradeoff remains a core challenge. Recent work by Abel et al. (2025) formalized this dilemma by defining plasticity as the generalized directed information from an agent's observations to its actions, and empowerment as the generalized directed information from its actions to its observations. This formulation successfully reframes the traditional stability-plasticity tradeoff as an empowerment-plasticity tradeoff. However, while extensive literature exists on optimizing for empowerment, there is currently no research addressing the optimization of plasticity under this new definition. This paper presents preliminary work toward optimizing plasticity within Markov decision processes. We show that there exists a Bellman optimality equation for optimizing plasticity similar to previous work for empowerment.

Abstract: Combining search with function approximation has driven major advances in game-playing programs, making self-play algorithms more competitive than ever. Still, the computational overhead of the most popular methods, based on Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS), can be substantial. In this work, we investigate whether simpler methods remain competitive in non-trivial, moderately sized games such as Connect Four, Hex(7x7) and synthetic games. We train a minimal self-play implementation of Approximate Value Iteration (AVI) and use ground-truth oracles for exact evaluation. Contrary to expectations, our results demonstrate the surprising effectiveness of AVI: it learns more accurate value functions than those learned by AlphaZero, while its one-step-lookahead greedy policies remain competitive with MCTS-based policies at substantially lower training and inference costs. Preliminary experiments on Othello and Go(9x9) show that AVI trains stably on larger games and learns effective value functions. These findings suggest that the success of MCTS-based methods may have eclipsed simpler approaches that have become increasingly practical with modern deep-learning tools.