Papers for

forensic analysts

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

FiLM-CAM secures image watermarks with secret key based control

FiLM-CAM: Keyed Feature Modulation for Conditional-Access Watermarking

Abstract: We propose FiLM-CAM; a conditional-access image watermarking approach that enforces authorized encoding, decoding, and removal through keyed feature modulation. A secret key conditions a Feature-wise Linear Modulation (FiLM) mechanism that transforms the internal representation of the watermark signal before embedding, thereby coupling the payload to the key at the feature, rather than pixel level. The same key must be presented to condition the decoder to correctly recover the payload embedded in an image. To enforce conditional access, we train the system to maximize the performance gap between authorized and unauthorized use, ensuring reliable extraction under the correct key while inducing failure under incorrect keys. In addition, we design our encoder to estimate the watermark residual invariant to the presence of pre-existing watermarks. This design enables conditional watermark removal via simple re-encoding and subtraction of the residual using iterative refinement, contingent on knowledge of the secret key. We evaluate FiLM-CAM across multiple watermarking encoder-decoder backbones, demonstrating that keyed feature modulation serves as an effective, architecture-agnostic conditional access module (CAM) for image watermarking.

Wed 21 OctComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Protecting images with hidden watermarks can be tricky, especially when only authorized people should add, read, or remove them. The authors created a system called FiLM-CAM that uses a secret key to change how watermarks are hidden inside images at a deep feature level, not just in the pixels. This means only someone with the right key can find or erase the watermark properly. They also trained the system so it works well when using the correct key, but fails if the wrong key is used. This method works across different kinds of watermarking systems, making it flexible and reliable.
Open → 2610.30347v1

Forensic reconstruction of AI agent logs needs source bindings for accuracy

Correct Answers, Unsupported Findings: Evidence Binding in Forensic Reconstruction of LLM Agent Logs

Abstract: Forensic reconstruction of LLM-agent actions requires not only recovering the correct value, but establishing which preserved record supports that finding. Tool logs, generated explanations, and local citation identifiers capture different parts of this evidence, yet a citation identifier does not establish a source unless its binding to a record is preserved. We audit this distinction using 64 mechanically checkable cases from saved AgentDojo Banking executions. Two LLM readers reconstruct source relationships under controlled variations in visible evidence and identifier-to-record bindings. We separately evaluate complete-record agreement, evidence-grounded findings, justified abstention, and unsupported assertions. With original identifiers and no binding table, Sonnet recovered every literal source location but made unsupported citation-source assertions in 26 of 28 cases requiring the missing relation; 22 nevertheless matched the complete reference. Adding explicit bindings improved grounded reconstruction for both readers, whereas identifier renaming alone provided no consistent remedy. A deterministic same-packet comparator correctly resolved the bounded task or abstained throughout. These results show that factual agreement alone is insufficient for evaluating forensic reconstruction of agent logs and motivate preserving explicit record bindings to distinguish supported findings from correct guesses.

Wed 7 OctCryptography and SecurityArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Figuring out exactly what an AI agent did involves not just picking the right answer but also showing clear proof of where that answer came from. The paper looks at how different pieces of evidence, like tool logs and citation identifiers, help or don’t help in tracing these actions. The authors found that just having the right answer isn’t enough; you need to keep clear links between sources and results to avoid unsupported claims. They tested different methods and showed that adding explicit links between evidence and findings helps improve trustworthiness.
Open → 2610.09581v1

Semantic watermarking detects manipulated images and how they changed

Semantic Watermarking for Malicious Image Manipulation Detection

Abstract: The proliferation of high-fidelity generative editing models has made it possible to inject violent or sexual content into otherwise ordinary images while preserving visual plausibility, with concrete consequences for public discourse and vulnerable populations. We propose a robust semantic watermarking framework that reframes the watermark as a recoverable semantic reference rather than an opaque identifier. Our framework combines a $β$-VAE-based binary watermark (CLIP-VAE) with explicit channel-aware training---random bit-flip noise is injected during training so that the decoder learns graceful degradation under the noisy watermarking channel. As a downstream application, a lightweight module SDA-Net uses the recovered semantic embedding to expose not only whether but in which semantic direction an image has been altered. In a 5-way comparison against representative binary hashing baselines (SimHash, ITQ, HashNet, and their robust-MLP variants), CLIP-VAE achieves the highest reconstruction cosine similarity to the original CLIP embedding under realistic InstructPix2Pix bit-error rates, and uniquely supports direction-of-drift detection---a forensic complement to existing content-moderation pipelines.

Wed 30 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Images can be secretly altered by AI to add harmful content while looking real, which can mislead people. The authors created a method that hides special signals called semantic watermarks inside images, making it possible to tell if and how an image was changed. Their approach uses a smart encoding system that can still recover these signals even if the watermark gets damaged. They also built a tool that reads these signals to explain the type of change made to the image, which is not possible with simpler watermark methods.
Open → 2609.39623v1

Deepfake detector shows what changed and where on the face

DF-CBM: Region-Aware Concept Bottleneck Models for Deepfake Detection

Abstract: Deepfake detection methods have become increasingly effective yet most provide limited insight into the evidence behind their predictions. However, in forensic settings users also need to know which manipulation cues support the decision and where they appear. Existing explainability methods only partially address this need since localization-based approaches lack semantic descriptions while language-based explanation methods are only weakly grounded in visual evidence. In this work, we propose DF-CBM, a region-aware concept bottleneck model for explainable deepfake detection. DF-CBM builds a compact vocabulary of manipulation-related concepts from textual artifact annotations and links each concept to plausible facial and boundary regions. It then predicts these concepts from visual features using a concept-specific masked attention mechanism guided by parsed facial masks and the final real/fake decision is made from the predicted concept bottleneck. Our experiments show that DF-CBM outperforms concept-based baselines in concept prediction and deepfake classification while remaining competitive with state-of-the-art black-box detectors. Finally, qualitative results and intervention analyses demonstrate that DF-CBM provides spatially grounded concept evidence and enables counterfactual explanations of how individual manipulation concepts influence the final prediction. Our code is available at: https://github.com/GeorgeTsoumplekas/DF-CBM.

Mon 28 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionMachine Learning
The gist
Detecting deepfake images is getting better, but people also want to know which parts of the face have been altered and what clues reveal these changes. The authors created DF-CBM, a method that links specific facial regions to common manipulation signs using a set of clear concepts learned from descriptions of artifacts. This approach not only detects deepfakes accurately but also shows which facial areas contributed to the decision, helping users understand the evidence behind the detection. The method can even explain how changing individual clues would affect the final decision, offering transparent insights.
Open → 2609.35096v1

Faster decision methods improve multimodal forensic image analysis accuracy

MAD-Guard: Controlled Study of Autoregressive Generation versus Direct Decision Interfaces for Closed Multimodal Forensic Tasks

Abstract: When should multimodal foundation models generate tokens, and when should they directly output a decision? We present MAD-Guard, a controlled study of output-decision interfaces for closed multimodal forensic tasks. Once a multimodal representation is computed, is autoregressive generation necessary for closed forensic decisions with high input complexity but low output entropy? Under a matched Qwen3-VL-8B backbone, 2,400 FakeClue training samples, and LoRA budget ($r=16, α=32$) on Huawei Ascend 910C NPUs, we evaluate a progression of decision interfaces (AR-SFT [generate] $\to$ Logit Slice $\to$ Binary Direct Head $\to$ +choice $\to$ +act $\to$ CLM-Head) and decompose latency into backbone representation (53.12 ms), 151,643-way vocabulary projection (+85.04 ms $\to$ 138.16 ms), and decoding (+248.26 ms $\to$ 386.42 ms). Under 1-to-1 binary supervision ($\mathcal{L}_{\mathrm{BCE}}$), a Binary Direct Head cuts latency by $2.60\times$-$7.27\times$ (53.12 ms) and lowers calibration error by $1.88\times$ (ECE = 0.0450 vs. 0.0845), with a -1.80% accuracy trade-off (93.10% vs. 94.90%; 0.9795 vs. 0.9871 ROC-AUC) from forfeiting token priors. Gains above AR-SFT arise either from multi-task attribution and uncertainty gating (+choice+act: 96.44% accuracy, 0.9940 ROC-AUC, 0.0187 ECE at 53.71 ms) or from a disaggregated contrastive head (CLM-Head: 96.55% binary and 96.44% multi-task accuracy, 0.0166 ECE, 98.79% 7-class attribution at 54.42 ms) retaining semantic priors without token decoding. Across 5,000 out-of-sample images from five benchmarks, our framework excels on synthetic, camouflage, and document forgeries (96.44% GenImage, 97.73% Chameleon, 91.84% Doc) while showing a clear boundary on compressed face manipulation (FF++ ROC-AUC = 0.5913).

Sun 27 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionCryptography and Security
The gist
Deciding if an image is fake or manipulated can be slow when models generate text step-by-step. The authors studied ways to speed this up by having models make direct decisions without generating tokens. They found that using direct decision methods cuts processing time significantly, with only a slight drop or sometimes an improvement in accuracy. This approach works well for complex forensic tasks involving images and text, especially for synthetic or document forgeries.
Open → 2609.33683v1

Geometric inconsistency detection improves wide baseline image analysis

Geometric Inconsistency Localization in Multi-View Image Sets

Abstract: Novel view synthesis (NVS) models can produce realistic new views of the same scene from different viewpoints. However, these generated views are not always geometrically consistent with one another. Multi-view (MV) consistency has shown promise as a tool for evaluating these NVS models. Its potential for multimedia forensics, however, remains largely unexplored, particularly for localizing geometric inconsistencies across wide-baseline image pairs. To enable research in this direction, we introduce DeformView, a wide-baseline MV dataset with pixel-level annotations of geometric inconsistencies. Using DeformView, we evaluate state-of-the-art MV consistency-scoring methods and show that approaches developed for NVS evaluation transfer poorly to the forensic task of geometric inconsistency localization. To address this limitation, we propose DEFECt3R, a lightweight learning-based classifier that uses cross-view feature relationships to localize geometric inconsistencies at the pixel level. By learning from explicit supervision, including hard negatives from geometrically consistent yet deformed views, DEFECt3R improves localization performance and substantially reduces false positives compared to existing consistency-scoring methods. Ablation experiments further show that both feature representations and correspondence quality contribute to localization performance. Overall, our findings demonstrate that MV geometric consistency is a promising yet underexplored signal for multimedia forensics and establish a benchmark and baseline for geometric inconsistency localization in wide-baseline MV image pairs. Code and dataset are available at https://github.com/IDLabMedia/DeformView-DEFECt3R

Fri 25 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial IntelligenceCryptography and Security
The gist
When computers create new pictures of a scene from different viewpoints, sometimes the images don’t line up properly, causing geometric mistakes. The authors made a new collection of image pairs with marked geometric errors to study these problems. They found that current methods, which work well for generating new views, don’t do well at finding where exactly the errors are in images taken from very different angles. To fix this, they built a special tool that learns to spot these mismatches better, reducing mistakes and pinpointing problem areas in the images.
Open → 2609.31247v1

Contrastive learning boosts authorship verification accuracy to 98 percent

Contrastive Learning for Authorship Verification

Abstract: Our results show that contrastive learning outperforms a classification-based approach to authorship verification under the tested settings. We identify loss function, batch size, training duration, pre-trained model, input context length, and random text span data augmentation as important factors of model performance. Based on these considerations, we develop a ModernBERT Bi-Encoder model that achieves 98.4% accuracy on the PAN21 authorship verification task.

Wed 23 SeptComputation and LanguageMachine Learning
The gist
Determining if two texts come from the same author can be tricky. The authors show that a method called contrastive learning works better than traditional classification approaches for this task. They found that several factors like the training setup and data preparation influence performance. Their final model, based on a version of BERT, reached very high accuracy on a standard authorship test.
Open → 2609.28471v1

Physics based method detects fake AI generated audio video clips

PIVOT: Physics-Grounded Verification for AI-Generated Audio-Video Detection

Abstract: As generative models continue to advance, AI-generated content (AIGC) is becoming increasingly realistic, weakening the artifact cues commonly exploited by existing detectors. Nevertheless, faithfully reproducing the physical behavior of real-world events remains challenging for current generators. We therefore explore detecting AIGC by assessing whether the depicted event satisfies measurable constraints derived from physical laws. We introduce PIVOT, a physics-grounded AIGC detector, instantiated here for audio-video clips, that estimates physical quantities from video and audio, selects physical laws relevant to each clip, and verifies their measurable constraints. Beyond a real/fake decision, PIVOT returns supporting evidence that records the verification outcome, relevant time window, and supporting quantities for each applicable law. Although instantiated and evaluated here on audio-video data, the framework can, in principle, extend to other AIGC modalities whenever the physical quantities required for verification can be estimated reliably. We also introduce PhysForensics-Bench, comprising paired real and generated audio-video clips from nine event-centric scene families and two recent audio-video generators. On PhysForensics-Bench, PIVOT achieves 70.30% accuracy and 64.29% F1 score on Real+Seedance, and 72.16% accuracy and 65.82% F1 on Real+VEO. In comparison, direct inspection with Gemini 3.1 Pro obtains 53.96% accuracy and 60.09% F1 on Real+Seedance, and 57.22% accuracy and 63.44% F1 on Real+Veo. These results demonstrate the practical promise of physical-consistency verification as a structured and inspectable source of evidence that complements artifact-based AIGC detection.

Mon 14 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionArtificial IntelligenceMultimedia
The gist
AI-generated videos and sounds are getting very realistic, making it hard to tell if they're fake by usual methods. The authors created PIVOT, a new way to spot fake clips by checking if the events in them follow real-world physical rules, like how sound and motion should line up. PIVOT not only decides if a clip is real or fake but also shows its reasoning by highlighting which laws were tested and what it found. Tests show PIVOT works better than some existing tools at spotting AI-generated audio-video content.
Open → 2609.15562v1

BruNet improves bruise outlines using self-supervised vision transformer

BruNet: A Cross-Domain Transfer Framework for Bruise Segmentation

Abstract: Segmenting bruises is a challenging task in medical imaging due to limited data and annotations, diffuse boundaries, and highly variable appearance. In this work, we propose BruNet, a segmentation framework that combines a ViT-based visual encoder (a self-supervised DINOv3 or a pretrained LingBot-Vision backbone) with a SAM-based mask decoder. BruNet is trained on the HAM10000 skin lesion dataset and evaluated on a separate bruise dataset without additional fine-tuning. Although a small number of prior studies have explored machine learning and computer vision for bruise analysis, existing work has primarily focused on detection, classification, or colour analysis rather than pixel-level localisation. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to address automatic bruise segmentation. Our results show that BruNet outperforms CNN-based models, state-of-the-art segmentation models, ChatGPT-4o/5-assisted SAM2 zero-shot baselines, and the medical-oriented MedSAM model, demonstrating strong cross-domain generalisation to bruise segmentation.

Thu 10 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Bruises are hard to pinpoint in medical images because they sometimes look blurry and change a lot in appearance. The authors created BruNet, which uses a special image understanding method called a vision transformer combined with a technique that helps find shapes in images. BruNet was trained on a skin lesion dataset but then used to identify bruises without extra training. It works better than older methods and even approaches that use large language models to help. This is the first computer method that tries to map bruises precisely at the pixel level.
Open → 2609.11463v1

Afid framework improves automated fingermark recognition and analysis accuracy

AFID: A Unified Open Framework for Automated Fingermark Identification, Quality Assessment and Feature Extraction

Abstract: Automated fingermark identification is the foundation of forensic investigation, yet progress in the field is held back by fragmented, closed-source solutions trained on private or discontinued data. We present AFID, a unified open-source framework for friction ridge image processing that performs recognition, quality assessment, and feature extraction based on a single shared encoder, trained exclusively on publicly available data. At its core is a fixed-length representation learned for identity discrimination, trained under heavy augmentation. Despite applying essentially no preprocessing beyond resizing and padding at inference, AFID sets a new state of the art in fixed-length fingermark recognition, leading identification across NIST SD 27 (67.6% rank-1) , SD 302 (54.9% rank-1), and SD 303 (67.6% rank-1), surpassing a commercial matcher on fingermarks. From the same frozen backbone, a quality assessment module predicts recognition utility more accurately than any compared baseline and generalizes across independent matchers, while lightweight decoders recover minutiae, ridge orientation, and segmentation competitive with dedicated methods. The framework proves that a single, efficiently trained encoder can support the full fingermark processing pipeline, from recognition through quality assessment all the way to feature extraction. To accelerate research on fingermark analysis even further, we release the code, models, and annotations to the community.

Mon 7 SeptComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
The gist
Identifying fingerprints from crime scenes is important, but many current computer tools are closed and use private data. The authors created AFID, an open and unified software system that can recognize fingerprints, judge their quality, and find features using the same underlying model. AFID works well even without complex image adjustments and matches or beats commercial tools on standard forensic tests. It also predicts which fingerprints are good enough to use and extracts key details accurately, all with one shared model.
Open → 2609.07439v1