Papers for

financial traders

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Market making method reduces trading losses with adaptive pricing

Regret Bounds for Market Making with Persistent Orders

Abstract: We study adversarial market making with orders that remain active until execution. The maker operates on two markets: a primary market where orders are made and a secondary market where the resulting positions are hedged. In each round, the maker posts a quote on the primary market before observing both primary and secondary market prices. An order executes when the primary price reaches its quote, and the resulting position is immediately offset at the secondary price. When both price sequences are chosen by an adversary over $T$ rounds, we give a simple deterministic policy with regret of order $\log T$ against the best fixed quote (static comparator) and $\sqrt T$ against the best quote for each submission date (dynamic comparator), plus two terms measuring exposure to future primary and secondary prices. These rates remain optimal even when both exposure terms vanish and lower bounds show that the exposure terms are necessary. Our policy naturally extends to simultaneous bids and asks, where we show that static and dynamic regret are both characterized (up to constant factors) by the exposures terms (where the primary price exposure $V_T^{\mathrm{two}}$ now accounts for both bids and asks) and a term of order $\sqrt{V_T^{\mathrm{two}}\log T}$. Our policy is simple, efficient and fully parameterless. We extend this setting by demonstrating how natural assumptions on the price processes lead to improved guarantees without changing the policy.

Wed 4 NovComputer Science and Game TheoryMachine Learning
The gist
This paper looks at how someone who buys and sells assets can set prices in two connected markets without knowing future price changes. The authors present a simple, automatic way to pick prices that limits how much worse the trader does compared to the best fixed or changing prices. Their method works even when market prices might behave unpredictably or adversarially, and it adapts well when prices have certain patterns. This means a trader can make informed pricing decisions without tuning parameters in advance.
Open → 2611.06159v1

Tensor analysis improves limit order book prediction accuracy

TensorLOB: Structure-Preserving Tensor Learning for Limit Order Book Forecasting

Abstract: The limit order book (LOB) records outstanding buy and sell orders across multiple price levels. Its state evolves over time across market side, price level, and order attribute, naturally forming a multiway structure. However, existing LOB models typically flatten these dimensions into a matrix model, thus obscuring the existing structural relationships. Starting from first principles and the market-microstructure intuition of the LOB, we design TensorLOB to operate entirely in the tensor domain. TensorLOB uses mode-wise tensor contractions for feature extraction and directly contracts the learned representation with low-rank class-weight tensors for prediction, retaining the distinct roles of time, side, level, and attribute modes. Experiments on the FI-2010 benchmark show that TensorLOB achieves the highest accuracy, recall, and F1 score across all four evaluated horizons. This proof of concept highlights the potential of high-dimensional modelling of multi-way latent information intrinsic to financial markets, which has so far been largely overlooked.

Mon 2 NovMachine Learning
The gist
Financial markets have records of many orders to buy or sell stocks at different prices, called the limit order book (LOB). This data has many parts like time, price levels, and order types that create a complex structure. The authors developed TensorLOB, a method that keeps this complex structure intact using math tools called tensors, instead of simplifying it. This approach helps better predict future market movements, showing improved results on a common testing dataset.
Open → 2611.02866v1

Financial leverage can reduce gambler ruin risk significantly

With Leverage, the Gambler is Not the One Who Gets Ruined

Abstract: In this note we explore the following simple question: How does the classic \emph{gambler's ruin} phenomenon change if we allow the gambler \emph{financial leverage}? We show that, with a moderate amount of leverage, it is possible for an (idealized) gambler to sustain seemingly improbable profits over a remarkably long time horizon without ever going bankrupt, \emph{even} if the gambler makes only fair bets. With a leverage ratio of $L = 10$ (less than what Lehman Brothers Holdings had from 1995--2008), the probability of multiplying one's money by $1000\times$ without going bankrupt is roughly $50\%$. More generally, given $L$-fold leverage, and given the goal of multiplying one's money by a factor of $r > 1$, the optimal gambling strategy has probability roughly $r^{-1/L}$ of success. The results in this note are designed as part of the course development for the CMU randomized algorithms course.

Tue 13 OctData Structures and Algorithms
The gist
This paper looks at how adding financial leverage changes the usual risk of losing everything when gambling. The authors found that with moderate leverage, a gambler can often avoid bankruptcy and even make very large profits over time without needing to win more than fair bets. For example, with ten times leverage, there is about a 50% chance to multiply money by 1000 without going broke. The authors provide a formula for the chance of success based on leverage and desired profit. Their work is part of a course on randomized algorithms at CMU.
Open → 2610.19239v1

Prophet inequality improves stopping decisions from sample random walks

Sample-Based Prophet Inequalities for Random Walks

Abstract: We study prophet inequalities for a random walk reward stopping problem with sample-based information. The goal is to stop as close as possible to the maximum of a random walk with i.i.d. increments, measuring performance by the ratio between the expected reward when stopping and the expected true maximum. We consider a sample-based model in which the increment distribution is unknown and the decision maker has access to $K$ independent sample paths of the reward process. For the infinite-horizon setting, we establish a sharp prophet inequality with constant $(K/(K+1))^{K+1}$. The guarantee is attained by a randomised stopping rule based on the ladder height decomposition of random walks. As $K\to\infty$, this recovers the classical $1/e$ prophet inequality from the full-information setting. For the finite-horizon setting, where the process terminates after $n$ steps, we first prove a tight no-information prophet inequality with constant $1/H_n$, where $H_n$ is the $n$-th harmonic number. For $K\ge1$ samples, we show that a prophet constant of $1/4$ is attainable. Finally, we prove that, with $K$ samples, the prophet constant is at most $(K/(K+1))^{K+1}+(6+6H_K)/H_n$ for $n\ge 2K^2$, implying convergence to the infinite-horizon constant as $n\to\infty$. Our approach combines random walk theory, including ladder heights and Spitzer's identity, with linear programming duality. Our results contribute to random walk stopping theory and to sample-based prophet inequalities for correlated rewards, an area that remains largely unexplored. To the best of our knowledge, our tight sample-based prophet inequalities are the first whose performance is parameterised exactly, rather than only up to constants, by the number of available samples.

Tue 22 SeptData Structures and Algorithms
The gist
This paper studies how to make the best decision about when to stop watching a random process that changes in steps, without knowing the process’s details beforehand. The main goal is to stop near the highest point that the process will reach. The authors develop mathematical guarantees on how close the stopping rule’s expected reward is to the true maximum, based on how many sample paths of the process are available. Their results connect classic probability tools with new techniques to give exact performance limits depending on the number of samples.
Open → 2609.26017v1

Multi-agent AI specialists forecast 2026 FIFA World Cup matches

Information Specialization and Constrained Synthesis in Multi-Agent LLM Forecasting: A Prospective Live-Study of the 2026 FIFA World Cup

Abstract: Large language models are being organized into multi-agent systems with specialized roles, but whether such specialization produces distinct forecasts and whether subsequent synthesis improves utility remains unclear. In this study, we carried out a live, prospective evaluation over the final 56 matches of the information-dense 2026 FIFA World Cup, keeping a frontier foundation model constant while assigning two primary forecasting agents contrasting specialist roles: a quantitative specialist focusing on structured performance statistics and a news specialist focusing on current injuries, tactics and information from press conferences. Their forecasts were then reviewed by a separate critic before being combined by a meta-agent, resulting in a sequential four-agent model. Forecasts from the betting market served as an external benchmark. The news specialist obtained the highest mean probability-weighted Top-3 utility and matched the betting market in Top-3 exact-score hits. Nevertheless, the two specialist forecasters agreed on at least two of the three scorelines in 50 out of 56 matches, and the meta-agent never generated more than one scoreline outside the specialists' forecast set. These findings show that rapidly changing, unstructured information can provide a valuable forecasting signal alongside structured statistics, whereas adding critic and meta-agent stages does not necessarily create complementary information or improve on the strongest specialist.

Fri 11 SeptArtificial IntelligenceComputation and Language
The gist
Predicting sports outcomes is hard, especially when information changes quickly. This study tested two AI models with different expertise: one used numbers and stats, and the other used news about players and tactics to predict World Cup soccer games. They also tried combining these forecasts with extra AI reviewers. The news-focused AI predicted almost as well as betting markets, but mixing all AI opinions didn’t improve the best forecasts. This suggests diverse information helps, but combining expert AI forecasts isn’t always better.
Open → 2609.12495v1