Papers for

financial algorithm designers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Strongly adaptive online learning improves discounted regret rates

Strongly Adaptive Online Learning Achieves Uniform Discounted Regret

Abstract: Discounted regret measures the performance of an online learner by assigning exponentially decaying weights to past losses, reflecting the greater importance of recent losses in non-stationary online learning. While previous work obtains uniform discounted regret bounds over a continuous range of discount factors using a specialized meta-algorithm, its results are limited to convex functions. In this paper, we demonstrate that strongly adaptive regret bounds can directly imply uniform discounted regret guarantees for convex, strongly convex, and exp-concave loss functions. Our key observation is that discounted regret against a fixed comparator admits an exact decomposition into a convex combination of interval regrets. For convex functions, this reduction yields an $O(\sqrt{\log T/(1-λ)})$ discounted regret bound for all discount factors $λ\in(0,1)$, matching the previous rate over a broader range of discount factors. For strongly convex and exp-concave functions, we provide regret bounds of $O\left(\log T\left(1+\log\frac{1}{1-λ}\right)\right)$.

Thu 29 OctMachine Learning
The gist
When machines learn from data that changes over time, it's important to care more about recent mistakes than older ones. The authors show how a technique called strongly adaptive learning helps machines keep this focus and perform better across different ways of weighing recent mistakes. They found simpler ways to get good results for different types of learning problems, including those with special mathematical properties. This work improves on earlier methods that were more limited.
Open → 2610.39292v1

Efficient offline learning of risk-aware decision policies

Provably Efficient Risk-Sensitive Offline Reinforcement Learning via Optimized Certainty Equivalents

Abstract: Risk-sensitive reinforcement learning (RL) addresses decision-making under uncertainty and adverse outcomes. Learning risk-sensitive policies from fixed datasets is important when additional interaction with the environment is costly. Existing work on risk-sensitive RL focuses on online settings or specific risk measures, leaving a general theoretical understanding of its offline setting underdeveloped. In this work, we investigate efficient offline risk-sensitive RL using the optimized certainty equivalent (OCE), a general class of risk measures. We consider two formulations: dynamic-OCE RL, which applies OCE recursively at each step, and static-OCE RL, which applies a single OCE to the cumulative rewards. Under the tabular setting, we develop pessimistic value-iteration algorithms for both formulations and establish tight sublinear suboptimality bounds, explicitly capturing how risk sensitivity, encoded by utility functions, affects learning difficulty. Moreover, we establish minimax suboptimality lower bounds to characterize the problem's fundamental limits. To handle large state spaces, we further develop pessimistic least-squares value-iteration algorithms that incorporate the general OCE risk criterion into linear function approximation. We establish utility-dependent sublinear guarantees with explicit dependence on the feature dimension $d$. To our knowledge, we provide the first offline algorithms along with the first upper and lower suboptimality bounds for both dynamic- and static-OCE RL.

Thu 15 OctMachine LearningArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Making decisions that account for risk is important in many fields but learning good risk-aware policies from past data without new experiments is hard. The authors study mathematical ways to measure risk and develop algorithms that learn risk-sensitive strategies from fixed datasets efficiently. They prove how well their methods work and also show the fundamental limits of learning in this setting. Their work improves understanding of how risk preferences influence the difficulty of offline learning.
Open → 2610.21870v1