Papers for
ergonomics teams
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Lightweight EEG model improves cognitive workload detection under limits
FOCUS: A Lightweight Mamba-2 Model for EEG-Based Cognitive Workload Classification
Abstract: Cognitive workload estimation from physiological signals is increasingly relevant in high-risk environments, where continuous and unobtrusive monitoring can inform adaptive systems and safety interventions. This paper presents FOCUS (Frequency-band Optimized Cognitive-load Ultralight SSM), a compact Mamba-2-based model for EEG-based binary workload classification under constrained data conditions. Rather than learning frequency sensitivity from data, FOCUS encodes preprocessed multi-channel EEG using a fixed FFT decomposition that covers the five canonical EEG bands. The proposed model combines depthwise-separable convolution and a weight-shared encoder-bottleneck Mamba-2 pair, with 0.04 million parameters and 0.11 GFLOPs. Evaluated in a pilot study with 11 participants under leave-one-subject-out cross-validation across three cognitively distinct tasks, FOCUS achieves 74.75% accuracy on the full dataset at 0.08 ms GPU model-forward latency. In the weight-sharing ablation, the shared configuration achieves 4.55 percentage points higher accuracy on the full dataset than the non-shared variant while reducing the SSM parameter budget; however, this difference does not reach statistical significance under a two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test ($p=0.083$). Overall, the selected FOCUS configuration provides a favorable trade-off between classification performance and computational cost within this controlled pilot setting.
Machine learning reveals sleeve pressure patterns to screen arm posture
What the Sleeve Feels: Explainable Machine Learning for Textile Pressure-Based Postural Screening
Abstract: Pressure-sensing smart textiles convert body-surface contact into a dense, image-like signal closely tied to posture and movement, making them a promising low-cost route to wearable posture screening. Realizing that promise, however, requires more than classification accuracy: a deployable system must generalize to wearers unseen during training, expose the physical evidence behind its decisions, and tolerate the small donning offsets that occur whenever a garment is removed and re-worn. This paper addresses these three requirements jointly using a knitted piezoresistive sleeve worn on the forearm as a testbed. We regroup fine-grained everyday activities into three coarser screening categories (neutral, potentially undesirable, and functional or transitional), engineer 29 interpretable pressure-distribution features spanning global intensity, spatial center of pressure, quadrant asymmetry, distribution complexity, and short-horizon temporal change, and evaluate under a strict subject-wise split. A tuned XGBoost classifier reaches 0.818 accuracy, 0.788 balanced accuracy, and 0.801 macro F1 on unseen test subjects, with tight frame-level bootstrap 95% intervals of about plus-minus 0.01 and a subject-to-subject standard deviation near 0.06 under leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. A simple 2D-CNN baseline trained on raw frames achieves broadly similar performance, showing that hand-engineered features are not left behind by a learned spatial representation on this task. SHAP-based explanation, a feature-group ablation, per-activity error analysis inside the pooled undesirable class, class-mapping sensitivity, and a simulated donning-rotation stress test together locate what the model relies on, where it degrades, and why, directly targeting the generalization, interpretability, and robustness gaps that determine whether such a system is deployable.