Papers for
environmental data engineers
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Ontology guided framework builds climate knowledge graph from papers
Ontology-Guided Knowledge Graph Construction from Structured Metadata and Climate Science Publications
Abstract: The rapid expansion of scientific literature far outpaces the speed of manual curation, creating a fundamental bottleneck in extracting structured knowledge from scientific texts. To address this, we introduce an agentic, ontology-guided framework for knowledge graph (KG) construction. Our framework utilizes specialized agents for document understanding, information extraction, ontology conformance, and entity linking. First, an LLM extracts factual knowledge in the form of triples with explicit textual evidence from research papers. Then the triplets undergo a multistage verification process to ground the triplets in the ontology. By enforcing schema constraints and requiring evidence in the form of text fragments, we ensure the data is both semantically consistent and traceable. In an agreement study over 1,000 extracted triplets, Gemini-2.5-flash achieves Cohen's $κ$ scores of 0.640--0.700 against three human annotators, matching the human--human agreement range of 0.616--0.689. We applied this framework to 2,000 scientific publications and construct a novel, ontology-grounded KG for climate science with 133,990 nodes and 755,308 relations; of the 23,327 triplets that the publications contribute after validation, 98.96\% are judged correct. The pipeline code and KG is publicly available https://github.com/aayushacharya/climatekg.
Multimodal data improves animal identification in wildlife conservation
Advancing Wildlife Conservation through Multimodal Animal Re-Identification with Environmental Metadata
Abstract: Identifying individual animals is crucial for effective wildlife monitoring and conservation efforts. Recent advancements in computer vision have shown promise in animal re-identification (Animal ReID) by leveraging data from camera traps. However, existing Animal ReID datasets rely exclusively on visual data, overlooking environmental metadata that ecologists have identified as highly correlated with animal behavior and identity, such as temperature and circadian rhythms. Meanwhile, modern vision-language models (VLMs) offer rich multimodal reasoning capabilities, but existing resources underutilize their text-processing potential. To address these limitations, we propose MetaWild, a multimodal Animal ReID dataset comprising 20,890 images across six species, paired with environmental metadata extracted from embedded camera trap overlays and scene contexts. Additionally, to facilitate the use of metadata in existing ReID methods, we propose the Meta-Feature Adapter (MFA), a lightweight module that can be incorporated into existing VLM-based ReID methods, allowing ReID models to leverage both environmental metadata and visual information to improve ReID performance. Experiments on MetaWild show that combining baseline ReID models with MFA to incorporate metadata consistently improves performance compared to using visual information alone, validating the effectiveness of incorporating metadata in re-identification.
Deep learning predicts wildfire spread faster using fuel load data
Interpretable Patch-Based Deep Learning for Wildfire Spread Prediction from Ensemble Simulations
Abstract: Wildfire spread is traditionally predicted using physics-based simulators, which are physically interpretable but whose cost increases with each additional ensemble member. We ask how well deep learning surrogates can reproduce these simulations at a fraction of this cost, training them on 10,584 fire spread simulations at 2m resolution for the Rectoret region in Catalonia, Spain. Four architectures are compared: a patch-based U-Net, a transfer-learned ResNet-50, a physics-informed network constrained by the wind-driven advection equation and a Swin-Unet transformer. Among the terrain and vegetation variables, only surface fuel load predicts burn probability with any strength (r = 0.27) and including it lowers prediction error by 21%. The remaining variables correlate weakly and are highly duplicative. Next, an experiment with saliency, occlusion and rotation demonstrates the models' learning. Convolutional models rely primarily on distance from the current fire front, while Swin-Unet assigns more weight to fuel and terrain, a finding also noted in an unrelated wildfire dataset. When applied without retraining to the second region, Pedriza, all three convolutional models still predict fire spread, losing accuracy by a small but systematic margin.
Label-free clustering reveals limits of image-based species identification
InfoTaxa: Information-Calibrated Label-Free Clustering for Fine-Grained Visual Taxonomy
Abstract: Label-free clustering of frozen pretrained visual embeddings offers a scalable route to biodiversity monitoring, but image-only fine-grained taxonomy exhibits a consistent coarse-to-fine failure mode: clusters recover broad taxonomic structure yet plateau at species level. We study this behaviour on BIOSCAN-5M through an information-calibrated clustering analysis. BioCLIP~2 features with UMAP and HDBSCAN reach $0.79$ AMI at family and $0.67$ at genus, substantially improving over the prior image baseline and remaining competitive with oracle-$K$, graph-based, and learned clustering heads on the same frozen features. To diagnose whether the remaining plateau is method-limited or information-limited, we introduce InfoTaxa, which combines clustering efficiency---the fraction of probe-estimated image information recovered by an unsupervised partition---with paired DNA as an audit signal only, not an inference input. The density pipeline recovers approximately $0.90$ and $0.81$ of the image-available information at order and family, respectively. Held-out late-fusion probes show that adding DNA to the image embedding reduces species-level prediction error by approximately two bits. Robustness analyses cover multiple image encoders, described-species and rare-class subsets, probe diagnostics, and held-out-species coarse-rank generalisation and same-species retrieval. Thus, in the tested setting, species-level label-free clustering is both clustering-limited and representation-limited: improved clustering may recover additional image-exposed structure, but cannot close the DNA-audited information gap alone.