environmental compliance teams

Abstract: Existing noise mitigation strategies for wind farms usually consist in reducing turbines power output, without accounting for the wake interactions between them and the noise emission directivity. This leads to over-conservative policies and unexploited wind power. Yet, turbine yaw can simultaneously affect wake interactions and the direction of noise emission, offering an additional degree of freedom for farm-level noise control. We therefore propose Noise Steering, a model-free reinforcement learning (RL) strategy that jointly controls turbine yaw angles and power setpoints to maximise farm power while satisfying a local noise constraint in a defined region. To enable training at a reduced computational cost, a low-fidelity acoustic model is coupled with the steady-state FLORIS simulator. The RL agent effectively learns how to redirect wakes and noise directivity away from the protected region while redistributing power across the farm. On a six-turbine test farm, the policy satisfies the 40 dB noise constraint throughout the full range of turbulent winds, with an average power deficit of only 2% relative to greedy unimpeded control, and up to 7.7% at high wind speeds. In comparison, the industry-standard noise-reduced operation (NRO) baseline here generates an average power loss of 17%. When deployed in the higher-fidelity FAST.Farm simulator, the policy largely retains its performance under steady and turbulent inflow, despite differences in simulation fidelity. These results demonstrate the potential of combining yaw control and power derating through RL to improve the power-noise trade-off in wind farm operation.

Abstract: An AI data center is committed years before it draws a watt: a few discrete choices (grid or on-site gas, evaporative or dry cooling, which county to file in) fix its capital, water draw, and carbon path, and LLMs are now asked to help screen them with no test of whether they track what each commitment rules out. We introduce DCBench-440, with two arms reported separately: 200 generative questions over STRIPS worlds for five US deal archetypes, with search-verified gold answers and no tested shortcut above 12% on any question type, and 240 multiple-choice questions grounded in quoted site records, emission equations, and stated scenarios. Across open-weight deployments, accuracy spans 12.5-71.5% (generative) and 58.3-92.5% (multiple choice). One skill fails everywhere: asked to list every action available at a decision gate, no model exceeds 4.0% exact match. The strongest list 72-85% of the actions that would change the project's state but omit most permitted actions that change nothing; with those excused, the best exact match is still 24%. Code, data, and other materials are available upon request.

Abstract: Wood-image benchmarks can yield optimistic estimates when images from the same tree occur in both training and test sets. WoodBR-Cross contains 4,875 transverse-surface images in 38 operational taxonomic classes, linked to 303 distinct trees identified by numeric catalogue witness codes (codigos-testemunho) in the Brazilian Forest Service collection. A species-level subset comprises 3,406 images, 20 classes and 214 trees. Three tasks compare duplicate-aware image partitions for all classes (A), image partitions for the species subset (B1), and individual-tree-disjoint partitions for that subset (B2). In B2, all images from each tree are kept together, so no tree is shared across training, validation or test within a fold. ResNet-50, ConvNeXt-Tiny and ViT-B/16 were evaluated with three outer folds, internal validation and five training seeds. Handcrafted and frozen-feature baselines complement border-only and randomized-label controls. Validation-selected ConvNeXt-Tiny achieved B2 tree-level macro-F1 of 0.8621 +/- 0.0317; frozen DINOv2 features yielded 0.9000 +/- 0.0722. Values are means and standard deviations across three seed-averaged fold means. Results estimate performance on previously unseen trees from this collection.