Papers for

enterprise technology teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Personal agents amplify human goals with ongoing decision support

Avatar Intelligence: Amplifying Human Agency Through Persistent Personal Agents

Abstract: Personal AI agents are increasingly capable of handling long-horizon tasks across applications, yet users often need to invest substantial effort in specifying goals, resolving ambiguity, and verifying outcomes. We argue that progress should be measured by how effectively agents amplify human agency: enabling people to pursue their goals with less routine supervision while retaining control over consequential decisions. We advocate Avatar Intelligence, a paradigm of persistent personal agents that represent users' goals, values, and constraints through sustained decision delegation across contexts and time. We describe a maturity roadmap from human-directed execution to autonomous operation within delegated domains, and introduce the Agentic Oversight Index (AOI) as a framework for evaluating delivered value against agent-side operational cost and human oversight burden. We identify three core research challenges: identity-continuous personalization that carries user preferences across tasks, user-situated evolution through Rehearsal Engineering, and safety mechanisms that combine technical control with accountability and recourse. These directions define a research agenda for reliable decision delegation to personal agents across tasks and over time.

Mon 2 NovArtificial IntelligenceComputation and Language
The gist
Handling complex tasks with AI often requires people to give detailed instructions, check results, and clear up confusion. The paper proposes 'Avatar Intelligence,' where personal AI agents continuously represent a user’s goals and preferences over time and across different situations. These agents gradually take on more autonomous decisions while letting people oversee important outcomes. The authors suggest ways to measure how well agents help without burdening users and highlight challenges like making agents remember personal preferences, evolve with users, and maintain safety. This research aims to make AI assistants more helpful and trustworthy for long-term use.
Open → 2611.03092v1

Enterprise supply chains balance ai quality and carbon footprint

Toward Sustainable AI Deployment: A Carbon-Aware Decision Framework for Enterprise Supply Chain Systems

Abstract: Enterprises deploying AI for supply chain decisions commonly default to the largest available language model, a procurement heuristic that neglects both empirical performance and environmental cost. We benchmark six large language models across 520 supply chain tasks, simultaneously measuring decision quality and estimated generation-related operational carbon. Drawing on the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework, we develop a Carbon-Aware AI Procurement Framework (CAAPF), a Green IS design artifact that operationalizes sustainable AI governance for enterprise procurement. Within this bounded sample, quality spans 0.497-0.723, and the models with the largest disclosed parameter totals do not achieve the highest scores. The design does not isolate size, provider, architecture, or benchmark-construction effects. A category-by-tier calibrated GreenRoute proof of concept reaches 0.733 mean out-of-sample quality at an estimated 0.402 gCO2/task. Static Haiku reaches 0.699 at 0.022 gCO2/task, while Sonnet reaches 0.723 at 0.401 gCO2/task, demonstrating that the preferred strategy depends on the organization's quality requirement. Our "benchmark first, select green" principle suggests that environmental responsibility and decision quality can be mutually reinforcing, contributing to sustainable digital infrastructure governance aligned with SDG 12 and SDG 13.

Mon 14 SeptSoftware EngineeringComputers and Society
The gist
Enterprises often choose the biggest AI language models for supply chain decisions without considering how well they actually perform or their environmental impact. The authors tested six language models on many supply chain tasks, measuring both decision quality and the carbon emissions generated per task. They created a framework to help businesses pick AI models that are good enough while producing less carbon, supporting greener technology use. These findings show that bigger AI models are not always better and that companies can be smart about choosing AI to reduce environmental harm.
Open → 2609.14881v1