Papers for

enterprise optimization software developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Mixed integer solver tuning improved by one-pass large model selection

Nominate-then-Adjudicate: LLM-Assisted One-Pass and Per-Instance MIP Solver Tuning

Abstract: Mixed-integer programming solvers expose hundreds or even thousands of parameters whose best setting varies per instance, yet per-instance search is prohibitively expensive. We frame this as configuration for heterogeneous Big Data optimization workloads and propose a nominate-then-adjudicate pipeline built around two design choices. First, a fixed portfolio is sampled once and reused across instances, removing per-instance configuration search at inference; on the evaluated families, the resulting shortlist retains substantial oracle headroom, making selection within it the empirical focus. Second, the fixed 20-feature representation can map structurally different instances to the same vector, preventing a feature-only selector from distinguishing them even when they prefer different configurations. The foundation model receives no task-specific weight updates, and selection is one-pass: one model call and no solver calls at inference. The study represents structural Variety through distinct formulation families and decision Value through solver-performance outcomes; the one-call, zero-solve protocol specifies the decision interface and leaves end-to-end latency unmeasured. Among comparisons exceeding a 20% practical-difference threshold, the complete adjudicator records 538 wins and 185 losses against the top nominee, while its win rate against the default rises from 84.9% to 90.2%. Against per-instance configuration baselines under a matched one-pass protocol it leads the cluster-level methods and the best-performing evaluated per-instance baseline, ISAC+.

Wed 21 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Optimizing many parameters for mixed-integer programming solvers can make them work better on specific problems but usually takes a long time for each case. The authors propose a two-step approach: first, choose a small set of good parameter options for all cases, then quickly pick the best one for each problem using a single call to a large pre-trained model. This quick selection method avoids costly testing on every problem and still improves solver performance significantly compared to standard settings and other fast tuning methods.
Open → 2610.29391v1