Papers for

engineering modelers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Unified system improves equation discovery with adaptive solver choices

LegoSR: A Unified Framework for Self-improving Agent-Guided Scientific Discovery

Abstract: Equation discovery solvers often use different data interfaces, equation representations and evaluation criteria, making their results difficult to compare. We present LegoSR, a unified framework for algebraic symbolic regression and differential equation discovery. LegoSR integrates seven solvers through a common equation representation and evaluation process, and supports searches constrained by partially known equations. Researchers can run solvers directly or use LegoSR Agent, which selects solvers and adapts searches based on solver knowledge, intermediate results and lessons from earlier tasks. On noisy ordinary and partial differential equation benchmarks, LegoSR Agent recovers nearly as many equations as the union of seven expert-tuned solvers and outperforms a generic agent with the same model, tools and budget by up to 29 percentage points. Three examples demonstrate basic use, adaptive solver selection and discovery guided by partial physical knowledge.

Sat 24 OctArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Finding equations that explain scientific data can be tricky because different tools use different methods and speak different “languages.” The authors created LegoSR, a system that brings together seven equation-finding tools under one roof, so their results can be compared and combined easily. LegoSR also includes an assistant that chooses the best tool for the problem based on ongoing results and past experience. This makes discovering equations from noisy data more reliable and efficient.
Open → 2610.33465v1

Physics-informed machine learning improves function prediction with noisy data

Fast Learning Rates for Physics-Informed Kernel Methods

Abstract: In physics-informed machine learning, a target function $u^*$ is learned from noisy value observations $y_i=u^*(x_i)+ \varepsilon_i$, together with differential information, given either by noisy observations $d_j=(Du^*)(z_j)+ξ_j$ or by a known physical constraint $Du^*=v$. We consider the setting where $D$ is a linear differential operator and analyze a physics-informed kernel estimator $\hat u$ combining $n$ value observations and $m$ differential observations. In this context, we ask how much can differential information improve predictions, and how does this improvement depend quantitatively on $n$, $m$, and $D$. We prove finite-sample bounds, supported by numerical simulations, revealing a two-regime structure for the prediction error. When $m$ is limited, the rate depends jointly on $n$ and $m$; when $m$ exceeds a problem-dependent threshold, the rate saturates and matches the oracle rate obtained when the perfect constraint $D \hat u = Du^*$ is imposed. Examples are discussed for Sobolev spaces which are reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces and include partial Laplacian constraints on the torus and gradient observations on bounded domains. These examples illustrate the range of possible learning rate improvements --- from the standard nonparametric $n^{-1/4}$ to the parametric rate $n^{-1/2}$. Finally, we derive physically consistent rates in a stronger norm that jointly controls the errors in $\hat u$ and $D\hat u$.

Wed 16 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Predicting how physical systems behave can be tricky when data is noisy or limited. The authors study a method that uses both value measurements and information from physical laws expressed as differential equations. They show how the amount of physical information available can speed up learning rates, improving predictions. They also explain under what conditions the extra physical data gives the most benefit and provide mathematical guarantees and examples.
Open → 2609.18901v1