Papers for

energy system software developers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Language models assessed for restoring power with incomplete grid data

FLARE: Physics-Grounded Evaluation of Language-Model Agents for Feeder Restoration with Degraded Observations

Abstract: Restoring service after distribution-grid faults requires decisions from incomplete and conflicting information while respecting electrical constraints. Addressing this need, we introduce FLARE (Feeder-Level Agent Restoration Evaluation), a physics-grounded benchmark for post-isolation feeder restoration. FLARE con- tains 800 AC-feasible cases across five observation settings and allows agents to gather evidence, evaluate switches, and perform restoration actions under fixed operational limits. We evaluate five instruction-tuned models over 78,750 episodes, including topology, distributed-generation, and loading shifts. Mean normalized regret ranges from 0.082 to 0.148. Although every model has zero median regret, P95 regret ranges from 0.814 to 1.000, revealing an important failure tail. Shadow replay shows that 96.4% of 15,706 guard-rejected actions would have caused a physical violation. FLARE enables reproducible evaluation of language-model based restoration support while emphasizing the need for external safety checks.

Fri 16 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Restoring electricity after power grid faults is tricky because operators must make decisions with incomplete or conflicting information while making sure the electric system stays safe. The authors created FLARE, a testing system that combines real electrical rules with scenarios where data is limited or uncertain. They used FLARE to test several language-based AI models on many restoration tasks and found that while most decisions were safe, there were some important cases where mistakes could cause violations. This work helps safely evaluate AI tools that might support electric grid restoration.
Open → 2610.23251v1

GridSFM predicts optimal power flow efficiently across large grids

GridSFM: A Foundation Model for Solving AC Optimal Power Flow

Abstract: We introduce GridSFM, a framework that combines a pretrained foundation model across grid topologies with physics-informed fine-tuning for solving AC Optimal Power Flow (AC-OPF) at scale. It is a $15$ million parameter physics-inspired graph neural network pretrained across $54$ topologies of $500$ to $4{,}000$ buses. Our model attains a $2.45\%$ zero-shot generation-cost error on a $10{,}000$ bus case held-out operating conditions with no degradation as system size grows. Building on this, we pair the pretrained backbone with a physics-informed fine-tuning design based on Newton's method for power flow. With only $100$ solved instances, GridSFM adapts to unseen grids up to $10{,}000$ buses. We show it out performs single topology, dedicated neural network models that are trained more data, both in terms of cost and solver iterations when deployed as warm starting points. In designing this foundation model, we overcome the fact that the feasible set for AC-OPF can be disconnected. This is an obstruction that prevents any continuous neural network from approximating the solution map. To do so, we lift the problem and relax its constraints with logarithmically penalized slacks. We prove that the resulting elastic feasible set is contractible, that the AC-OPF minimizers remain minimizers of the elastic problem above an explicit penalty threshold, and that projecting an approximate solution back onto the AC-OPF feasible set is well posed. We release all models, data, and code so that the community can build on a shared starting point for AC-OPF.

Thu 24 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Finding the best way to send electricity through complex power grids is hard because the math can be tricky and solutions change depending on the grid's layout. The authors created GridSFM, a large neural network trained on many grid setups that can quickly predict good solutions for big power grids it has never seen before. They improved it further by combining it with physics knowledge to fine-tune the predictions on new grid layouts, even with very little new data. To handle mathematical challenges caused by disconnected possible solutions, they changed the problem representation so their model can learn well and provide accurate results.
Open → 2609.30173v1