energy system planners

Abstract: Sequential Model-Based Optimization (SMBO) traditionally relies on Bayesian or ensembling surrogates for uncertainty quantification. While historically treated as fully data-driven, SMBO increasingly integrates external domain expertise to accelerate discovery. To overcome the opaque guidance and diminished integration fidelity of standard acquisition re-weighting, Probabilistic Circuits (PCs) have emerged as a generative surrogate alternative, enabling direct knowledge injection via conditional sampling. However, these generative routines lack the formal exploration-exploitation semantics required for rigorous optimization. We introduce the Distributional Conformance Score (DisCo), a novel metric that unifies the flexibility and efficiency of PCs with a formal uncertainty framework. DisCo provides a bounded, $[0, 1]$-normalized measure of model "surprise" that (1) recovers properties comparable to kernel-based uncertainty known from, e.g., Gaussian Processes, while maintaining linear-time inference, and (2) enables accurate assessment of conformance of external knowledge w.r.t. model evidence. We then present DisCoMBO, a framework leveraging these properties for robust, knowledge-aware optimization. We prove that DisCoMBO is a zero-regret algorithm and demonstrate its effectiveness across diverse benchmarks from AutoML, material optimization, and wind park optimization.

Abstract: Decision-focused surrogates can recover downstream decisions without identifying the quotient report. We characterize the equality set of the convex Smart Predict-then-Optimize surrogate (SPO+) population risk. Under central symmetry, the centered mean class is the unique Bayes minimizer exactly when every nonzero effective displacement makes the old optimizer leave the shifted optimal face with positive probability. This condition separates face crossing from selected-oracle disagreement and gives quantitative local coercivity. Without symmetry, strict crossing alone need not identify the mean; selection balance with reflected crossing restores quotient-report identification, and conditional versions extend the result to measurable predictors. These are population statements, without finite-sample report-recovery or generic transfer-regret guarantees. Closed-form mechanisms reproduce the analytic identities and rates. Portfolio, complete-matrix KuaiRec, and Energy/Storage studies measure predictive fidelity, shifted regret, and fitted-report geometry. A known data-generating process (DGP) companion retains their application geometries while isolating conditional-mean recovery and crossing, without testing the original observational assumptions.

Abstract: Artificial intelligence is increasingly deployed across energy systems to optimize efficiency, balance supply and demand, and integrate renewable sources. These applications alter how energy systems function, changing how benefits and burdens are distributed, whose needs are represented in system design, and who can influence decision-making, with consequences for energy justice that are rarely quantified. This paper addresses that gap through a systematic review of AI impact assessment approaches, followed by the development of a new framework. Reviewing 26 peer-reviewed frameworks using PRISMA methodology, we find that most address a single impact dimension, only three provide quantifiable indicators, and although 21 reference justice implications, only two operationalize justice-relevant constructs through measurable indicators. No existing framework combines multidimensional impact coverage with quantifiable indicators disaggregated by stakeholder group. We therefore introduce the Energy Justice Impact Assessment (EJIA) framework. Crossing four AI lifecycle stages - data collection, model development, deployment, and continuous adaptation - with the three tenets of energy justice (distributional, recognition, procedural) produces a map of where injustice can arise, which we use to derive a set of environmental, social, and economic outcome indicators. These are measured separately per affected stakeholder group and assessed against a counterfactual across defined phases, enabling observed effects to be attributed to the AI application. The EJIA framework is descriptive rather than normative: it makes differential impacts visible and comparable, while judging whether a pattern constitutes injustice remains a context-dependent decision for practitioners. An exemplary application to an AI-based demand-side response system in social housing demonstrates the framework's use.

Abstract: Time Series Foundation Models (TSFMs) promise a paradigm shift toward zero-shot forecasting by eliminating task-specific training. However, existing works often overlook trade-offs between predictive accuracy and probabilistic calibration. This paper presents a benchmark study of six TSFMs evaluated on energy, traffic, and financial datasets. We contrast their performance against statistical baselines and a supervised DL model. The study reveals that while TSFMs outperform statistical methods and supervised models, they are subject to a fundamental trade-off between point accuracy and probabilistic reliability. Specifically, xLSTM architectures provide robust probabilistic calibration across horizons. In contrast, patch-based transformers offer competitive accuracy but face calibration issues at long horizons, while transformer-based models exhibit context saturation points for optimal zero-shot reasoning. These findings offer evidence-based guidance for balancing generalization and uncertainty quantification in real-world deployments.

Abstract: We present scentree, an open-source Python package for constructing a scenario fan and a scenario tree for multistage stochastic programming from historical data. It combines machine learning and multivariate time series models to obtain a scenario fan that captures inter-stage dependencies in the stochastic processes. This scenario fan is subsequently transformed into a scenario tree suitable for multistage stochastic optimization, providing a flexible and extensible framework for uncertainty modeling. A key contribution is the automation of the complete workflow, including model selection, parameter estimation, scenario fan generation, and scenario tree construction. Scentree does not rely on assumptions about the underlying data distribution, reducing the statistical expertise required to produce a scenario tree. Furthermore, it is agnostic to the specific multistage stochastic problem to be solved.

Abstract: Tracking the energy transition requires reliable statistics on renewable deployment. Rooftop photovoltaics (PV) are especially hard to track, owing to their decentralised nature, and the resulting inaccuracies in official statistics are known but not quantified. Remote sensing offers an independent way to identify rooftop PV systems. We introduce a Bayesian framework to estimate the ground-truth rooftop PV capacity from remote sensing detections, turning an imperfect detector into an uncertainty-aware measurement instrument. Applied to France, the corrected detections estimate a capacity of 4.03 GWp [3.96--4.11] (99% credible interval) of rooftop PV below 36 kWp, matching the transmission system operator's connection data within 3.3% nationally, while identifying local under-reports of up to 61% of local capacity. We also document and quantify a significant truncation bias in French rooftop PV open data. Beyond France, the approach paves the way for more reliable estimates of rooftop PV capacity worldwide.