Papers for

energy system modelers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Reinforcement learning improves unit commitment and speeds up exact solvers

Reinforcement learning on the EPRI AI-ccelerating Unit Commitment benchmark: diagnosing over-commitment and guiding MILP with learned policies

Abstract: Reinforcement learning (RL) is increasingly proposed as a fast solver for unit commitment (UC), but standalone agents remain far more expensive than mixed-integer linear programming (MILP). In the first study of RL on the 51-generator, 72-hour benchmark of the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) AI-ccelerating Unit Commitment competition, we trace this gap to the agents' own exploration, close most of it, and show that the resulting policy can accelerate an exact solver. In every configuration tested, Proximal Policy Optimisation (PPO) and an action-branching Deep Q-Network (DQN) trained from scratch committed about twice the units of a thermal-only MILP optimum, at 39-64% higher cost, whereas a merit-order rule came within 1.6-7% (10-24% when unserved energy is priced). When each unit's decision is sampled independently, spare units insure against random de-commitments. Consistent with this, injecting exploration noise during fine-tuning enlarged a lean policy's fleet, a reward without shaping terms did not remove the over-commitment, and under their training noise the agents outperformed the rule subjected to comparable noise. Imitating the MILP solutions and fine-tuning conservatively brought PPO within 2.6% of the optimum, and these policies had the lowest penalised cost of any evaluated (about 5%). Fixing the fine-tuned policy's confident decisions made the MILP 3.8-8.5 times faster within 0.10-0.25% of the best solution, with a smaller worst case than an imitation-only policy fixing as many variables (1.1% against 8.9%). Because dispatch method and benchmark scope alone shift the reported optimality ratio by up to 3.6% and 9%, we propose a reporting protocol.

Sun 18 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Deciding which power generators to switch on over time is a complex problem called unit commitment. The authors studied how well reinforcement learning (RL), a form of AI, could solve this problem compared to traditional optimization methods. They found that basic RL strategies tended to turn on too many generators, increasing costs, but by training the RL agents to mimic optimal solutions and fine-tuning them, they achieved near-optimal results. Moreover, using these trained RL policies to guide exact solvers made those solvers much faster without losing accuracy.
Open → 2610.25544v1

Neural model predicts bubble motion and shape in fluid flows fast

Probabilistic Simulation of Gas-Liquid Interfaces with Coupled Flow Matching on Spherical Harmonics

Abstract: Bubbly flows involve strongly coupled bubble motion, deformation, and hydrodynamic interactions, making high-fidelity simulation computationally expensive. We propose a neural surrogate that jointly predicts bubble trajectories and interface deformation in a compact, shared representation, replacing costly mesh-resolved simulation with fast generative inference. Because two-phase flow dynamics is nonlinear and chaotic, we treat forecasting as a conditional generative problem rather than deterministic regression, predicting entire future windows in a single pass. We train and evaluate the surrogate on BubbleSH, a Front-Tracking dataset of rising deformable bubble swarms, assessing performance using trajectory, shape, and distributional metrics over kinematic, morphological, and interaction-based properties. The surrogate reproduces key flow statistics while running several orders of magnitude faster than the underlying DNS solver.

Mon 12 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Simulating bubbles moving and changing shape in fluids takes a lot of computing power. The authors created a neural network model that can quickly predict how bubbles move and deform together, using a shared representation. Instead of giving just one prediction at a time, their model produces multiple future steps in one go, capturing the complex and chaotic behavior of bubbles. Their approach runs much faster than traditional detailed simulations while still matching key physical properties.
Open → 2610.16327v1

Dirac interconnected neural networks find modular physical systems without simplification

Dirac-Interconnected Neural Elements: Discovering Modularity in Physical Systems Without Reduction

Abstract: Deep learning has shown remarkable success in the data-driven modeling of dynamical systems. Much of its success is attributed not to the flexibility of neural networks but to inductive biases based on physical prior knowledge, such as energy conservation and symplecticity. However, existing methods do not fully exploit the fact that real-world physical systems are interconnections of components. Some methods require the interconnection to be known a priori, while others assume the system to be reducible to an ordinary differential equation (ODE) and learn only the reduced ODE, discarding the algebraic constraints imposed by the interconnection. Here, we propose Dirac-interconnected neural elements (DINEs), a neural network model that represents a physical system as a differential-algebraic equation (DAE), whose algebraic constraints are given by a Dirac structure in kernel representation. With DINEs, we simultaneously identify from data the interconnection among the components as a Dirac structure and learn the characteristics of the components as neural networks. This allows us to keep the learned subsystems in unreduced form and isolate or compose them to make a new system without retraining. Moreover, DINEs can handle partially observable systems. Experimental results demonstrate these capabilities on physical systems beyond the reach of existing methods.

Fri 2 OctMachine Learning
The gist
Real-world physical systems are made of connected parts, but it’s hard for computers to learn their behavior if they assume the system is simplified or if the connections are known ahead of time. The authors created a neural network approach called DINEs that learns both the parts and how they connect directly from data, without simplifying the system. This lets them study and combine parts separately or together, even if some parts are not fully visible. Their tests show this works on complex physical systems where older methods struggle.
Open → 2610.02960v1

LLaTSA improves power grid stability predictions using language model alignment

LLaTSA: Large Language Model-Aligned General-Purpose Transient Stability Analysis

Abstract: Dynamic trajectory prediction has become an important paradigm for data-driven transient stability analysis (TSA), yet most existing predictors remain system-specific and require substantial retraining when network configurations, generation mixes, or state-variable sets change. Uni-TSA introduced a general-purpose TSA framework that combines channel-independent modeling with a pretrained large language model (LLM) predictor. Nevertheless, its application to heterogeneous systems is limited by ambiguity in short observations, a mismatch between numerical trajectories and LLM embeddings, neglected coupling among state variables, and the high inference cost of dense backbones. This paper proposes LLaTSA, an LLM-aligned framework for general-purpose trajectory-based TSA. LLaTSA first incorporates operating conditions, disturbance attributes, and state-variable identity through a structured textual prefix. It then aligns normalized temporal patches with a TSA-related vocabulary before processing them with a pretrained sparse decoder-only mixture-of-experts (MoE) backbone. A state-variable coupling module captures coordinated post-fault evolution, while teacher forcing and rollout-based training support iterative long-horizon prediction. Case studies on multiple test systems demonstrate accurate trajectory prediction, reliable stability discrimination, and effective adaptation across unseen scenarios.

Sun 13 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Predicting how power grids stay stable after disturbances is important but hard because models often only work for specific setups. The authors created LLaTSA, which uses a large language model to understand and predict these stability scenarios more generally. It adds extra information to help the model know what kind of problem it’s solving and looks at how different grid parts interact. Their tests show it predicts future behavior well and can work on setups it wasn’t trained on.
Open → 2609.14374v1