energy schedulers

Abstract: Choosing a few robust algorithms or schedules can require evaluating every candidate under many adverse scenarios, even though an agent only needs to identify the winners. A predictor may suggest those winners, but cannot rule out a surprise in an unevaluated scenario. We introduce Certified Adaptive Selection (CAS), which returns the exact top-$k$ set as soon as remaining uncertainty cannot change it. CAS keeps guaranteed lower and upper bounds on Expected Shortfall (ES), the average loss in the worst scenarios. Its stopping test compares the worst admissible selected candidate with the best admissible excluded one; for information-disjoint Cartesian intervals this one-cut test is necessary and sufficient. Prediction has a separate role: selecting the next outcome to evaluate, never authorizing the decision. For empirical ES with exact unit-cost queries, we compute in polynomial time the fewest evaluations that could have proved the realized decision in hindsight. Our prediction-guided agent CAS-PG is exact for every predictor, including adversarial ones. On two public algorithm-selection matrices, CAS-PG certifies the exact top three after 630 of 3150 and 981 of 2200 replayed queries, or $1.14$ and $1.18$ times that hindsight minimum. Without historical outcomes, its transcript-only variant requires $1.28$ and $1.37$ times the minimum, outperforming the tested non-predictive certified policies. Separately, a prediction-free CAS policy avoids $93.0\%$ of exact recourse solves in synthetic energy scheduling. One certificate thus supports several acquisition policies and separately proved risk/cost extensions: prediction changes the work, not the justified choice.

Abstract: Decision-making under uncertainty often relies on predicted parameters, yet accurate prediction does not necessarily lead to good operational decisions. Aligning prediction with downstream optimization requires learning from the consequences of the decisions those predictions induce. We introduce RL-PaO, a reinforcement learning framework that integrates system formulation, optimization, and decision execution into a single environment. This yields a Markov decision process in which prediction is regarded as action: it shifts the environment to produce subsequent context and reward that explicitly aligns prediction error with realized cost, and learning the optimal policy does not require differentiating through the black-box solver. We evaluate RL-PaO on day-ahead energy scheduling using real historical data. On the test year, RL-PaO achieves the lowest annual cost among the non-oracle baselines, achieving on average $10\%$ cost reduction. Moreover, RL-PaO is capable of further analyses to provide strong interpretability both from the policy evolution perspective and the cost-accuracy trade-off.