Papers for

energy market operators

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Auction method allocates routes in networks with limited capacity

Auction-based allocation of routes in capacity-constrained networks

Abstract: We study the route-set allocation problem between end nodes in capacity-constrained flow networks with transfer costs. We introduce an origin--destination (OD) bidding language, in which a participant bids for bounded conic combinations of inlet--outlet--quantity licences and the mechanism performs the routing through a network-flow optimising winner-determination problem. We then study payment rules for the OD mechanism. Under a restricted model with openly and uniformly priced sources and bidders who are indifferent to the source of the gas, the Vickrey--Clarke--Groves (VCG) payment is core-stable; the key structural fact is that in this regime some optimal aggregate flows never use a physical pipe in both directions, so the winner-determination problem reduces to a single-commodity network flow whose value is submodular in the set of active bidders. If source access is allowed to depend on the individual consumer -- a realistic feature, e.g. when gas deals are embedded in bilateral political bargaining -- the reduction fails and VCG payments may lie strictly outside the core. For this general model we propose a dual (nodal) pricing rule derived from the shadow prices of the flow-conservation constraints, and prove it is always core-stable, at the cost of dominant-strategy incentive compatibility. Illustrative examples accompany each result.

Wed 14 OctComputer Science and Game Theory
The gist
When networks have limited capacity and transfer costs, deciding who gets to use routes can be tricky. The authors study how to allocate these routes using auctions where participants bid for route licenses combined with amounts of flow. They show that under some conditions, a known payment system ensures stable and fair outcomes, but in more realistic cases where sources vary per user, they propose a different pricing method that guarantees stability but sacrifices some incentives. Examples illustrate their findings.
Open → 2610.20125v1

Pricing algorithms work best slow or fast depending on market rivalry

Delegate Pricing to Algorithms: When Slow and Steady Wins the Race

Abstract: We study the strategic design of learning algorithms in a canonical continuous-time pricing game. We introduce a meta-game in which firms select learning rates for a gradient dynamic, evaluating payoffs as the discounted sum of profits accrued along the entire learning path. We uncover a fundamental dichotomy driven by stage-game incentives: if the stage game exhibits strategic substitutability, firms unambiguously prefer the fastest possible algorithms to rapidly exploit a gradually adjusting opponent. Under strategic complementarity, however, an excessively fast algorithm accelerates the rival's competitive response, destroying transitional profit margins. Even though the competitive price is a strictly dominant action in the underlying stage game, we prove that firms optimally design sluggish algorithms, extracting surplus during a prolonged convergence to the competitive equilibrium.

Thu 8 OctComputer Science and Game Theory
The gist
This paper looks at how companies choose the speed of their pricing algorithms when competing continuously over time. The researchers found two key cases: when companies’ prices push each other in opposite directions, it's best to use fast algorithms to quickly gain advantage. But when prices encourage companies to match each other, slower algorithms are better because rushing leads to quick competition and less profit. So companies can benefit by deliberately designing slower pricing strategies in certain competitive situations.
Open → 2610.11675v1

European electricity trading markets designed for AI under rules

Functional Architecture of European Electricity Trading Markets: Requirements for AI Supported Trading Systems under Regulatory Constraints

Abstract: European electricity trading in the EU operates as a constrained multi-layer system in which legal design, exchange microstructure, and network physics are executed jointly across forward, day-ahead, intraday, and balancing horizons. This paper develops a functional architecture for AI-supported trading that is aligned with market-coupling mechanics, cross-zonal transfer constraints, and compliance obligations under REMIT, MiFID II, MiFIR, and EMIR. The contribution is a formal system specification composed of a decision-state vector, residual-exposure accounting, constrained optimization objective, executable-action permission gate, and fail-closed AI control logic with auditable records. The analysis maps major Nominated Electricity Market Operator (NEMO) venues and related exchange operators into an operational venue topology and identifies where cross-border coordination fails in practice: interface-level timing, permission heterogeneity, and balancing-layer coupling. The resulting framework proposes how AI can be deployed as a bounded decision component inside regulated market operation with explicit governance, rather than as an unconstrained prediction layer.

Thu 24 SeptArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Trading electric power across Europe is complicated because many rules and physical limits affect how energy moves and is bought or sold. The authors analyze these complexities and create a detailed plan for how artificial intelligence (AI) could help make trading decisions safely within these rules. Their framework ensures AI works with clear controls and checks instead of making unchecked predictions. They also identify where current coordination across borders often breaks down, suggesting where improvements are needed.
Open → 2609.29108v1