Papers for
energy demand forecasters
Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.
Graph use affects accuracy in predicting time-based data patterns
How Much Graph Is Too Much? Graph Construction and Exposure in Spatio-Temporal Forecasting
Abstract: Spatio-temporal graph neural networks combine a node's history with information from graph neighbors. The central question is whether graph neighbors provide predictive information beyond each node's own history. Forecast accuracy depends on both the choice of neighbors and the way graph messages enter the temporal model. We study these choices as graph construction and graph exposure on U.S. state unemployment, traffic speed, and electricity demand. Our diagnostic design uses two comparisons: varying exposure while holding the domain graph fixed, and varying construction while holding late gated integration fixed. A GRU using only each node's own history and randomized graph controls help assess what the graph contributes. Under a common change forecasting protocol, the same domain graph can improve or worsen error relative to the GRU across integration designs. Late integration alone is insufficient, while adding a fusion gate yields lower mean error in all three tasks. With late gated integration fixed, a graph based on residual correlations has the lowest mean error among the tested graphs, although randomized graphs perform similarly on unemployment. The findings support evaluating graph construction and integration together, with conclusions tied to the comparisons actually performed.
Online correction method improves multi-channel forecasts with less data storage
Local and Global Recursive Ridge Regression for Online Residual Correction of Frozen Multivariate Forecasters under Label Delay
Abstract: A frozen multi-horizon forecaster can be corrected online from its own residuals. However, under label delay the target of a block arrives only after the whole horizon has passed, and the corrector's retained state grows with the number of channels. Aiming to combine a small retained state with a large error reduction, we propose DRiC (DCT Ridge Corrector), which fits a ridge regression of the leading discrete cosine transform (DCT) coefficients of the next residual block on those of the frozen forecast and of the latest input block, with sufficient statistics updated recursively. Its local variant, DRiC-L, keeps one such regression per channel; its global variant, DRiC-G, pools all channels into one regression, whose statistics do not depend on the channel count. A guard tracks a running scale of the frozen forecast's residual for each channel; it skips updates on blocks far outside that scale and clips the issued correction. We evaluate on seven datasets (four ETT series, Weather with its missing-value codes filled, Electricity, and Traffic) with DLinear, PatchTST, and iTransformer backbones, against 10 naive, gradient-trained, and closed-form methods. DRiC-L with eight DCT coefficients (DRiC-L8) reduces the mean squared error (MSE) by 14.55% on average over 126 conditions, against 12.98% for ELF, the most accurate comparator, while retaining 15-17 times less state, although ELF is more accurate on Traffic. DRiC-G retains 14.6 kB on the 321-channel Electricity data and 18.9 kB on the 862-channel Traffic data and is the most accurate method at or below its state on both. However, 5 to 7 of the 10 comparators, all with at least 10 times its state, are more accurate there. On the unfilled Weather file, DRiC-L8 without the guard has on average 8.0 times the frozen forecast's MSE, whereas with the guard it reduces the MSE by 7.94%. Code: https://github.com/keiotakmin/dric.