Papers for

ecommerce engineers

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Knowledge distillation improves parallel code prediction for recommendations

Knowledge Distillation across Item and Code Spaces for Parallel Generative Recommendation

Abstract: Generative recommendation with semantic IDs represents each item as a sequence of discrete codes derived from its semantic representation and predicts these codes to generate recommendations. Existing semantic-ID recommenders are typically trained with hard labels for the observed next item. Although such supervision identifies the target, it provides no explicit distributional information about alternative items conditioned on the same user history. Sequential recommenders can supply this item-level predictive knowledge, but transferring it to semantic-ID generation is challenging because the teacher and student operate in item and code spaces, respectively. We propose two complementary knowledge-distillation objectives for parallel semantic-ID recommenders, which predict all code positions simultaneously without autoregressive prefix conditioning. Item Distribution Matching (IDM) reconstructs a catalogue-level item distribution from the student's parallel code predictions and aligns it with the teacher's item distribution. Code Marginal Matching (CMM) projects the teacher's item probabilities onto each code position using fixed item-to-code assignments, then matches the resulting code marginals to the corresponding student heads. Both objectives transfer the teacher's soft distributional knowledge while preserving the student's parallel prediction structure. Experiments on benchmark datasets show that both methods consistently outperform existing state-of-the-art approaches. On average, IDM improves Recall@10 by 15.39%, while CMM improves NDCG@10 by 8.28%. These results demonstrate that distillation in either reconstructed item space or code-marginal space can substantially strengthen hard-label supervision for parallel generative recommendation.

Fri 23 OctInformation RetrievalMachine Learning
The gist
Making recommendations by predicting semantic codes instead of items can be more efficient, but it's helped by learning the likelihood of alternative items. The authors found new ways to transfer prediction knowledge from traditional item-based models to code-based models, even though they work differently. They proposed two methods that match the predictions between the two models in different ways, which led to better recommendation accuracy. Their tests showed significant improvements over previous methods, meaning recommendations can be both faster and more accurate.
Open → 2610.32943v1

Dense retrieval outperforms generative retrieval with static item values

Revisiting Generative vs. Dense Retrieval: A Static Value Prior Reverses the Gap

Abstract: Generative retrieval (GR) has emerged as a strong candidate generator for sequential recommendation as language models and semantic-item identifiers have improved. However, GR is not a uniformly stronger replacement of dense retrieval (DR) in online retail candidate generation. We examine their differences on two Amazon Toys datasets under different metrics. GR leads on best relevant item value among users both methods cover, while DR leads on exact-target recall and relevant value across the ranked list. With deep analysis, we find that popularity contributes the most to GR's measured value lead. Adding the same static item value to DR in one reranking step reverses this lead and keeps recall above GR. Finally, on an industrial-scale internal e-commerce dataset with LLM-judged relevance, we show that a 14B SID-LLM still underperforms a $47\times$ smaller dense encoder.

Tue 13 OctInformation RetrievalArtificial IntelligenceMachine Learning
The gist
Finding the best products for people to buy online can be done using different computer methods. The authors compared two methods: one that generates recommendations using language models, and another that finds dense matching features. They discovered that the generation method seems better only because it focuses on popular items, but when adjusting for item values, the dense method actually works better and faster. They also showed that even very large language models don't beat smaller systems for finding relevant products.
Open → 2610.19065v1

Generative recommendation anticipates target features for better ranking

UniSGR-V2: Stepwise Target-Side Feature Anticipation and Crossing for Generative Recommendation

Abstract: Semantic-ID-based generative recommendation unifies retrieval and ranking through autoregressive decoding but differs structurally from discriminative models, which can directly access rich target-item side features. The attributes are compressed into a finite codebook during quantization, while the target item remains undetermined during decoding and its features cannot be looked up. This target-side feature vacuum weakens generation at each semantic-ID level through high conditional entropy and cascading errors, and final ranking through missing target-side feature crossing. Existing methods interact with candidate representations or generate discrete attribute tokens, but none reconstructs a continuous target-side representation inside decoding to support both stepwise generation and ranking. We propose TacGR (Stepwise Target-Side Feature Anticipation and Crossing for Generative Recommendation). Before decoding each codeword, TacGR anticipates a continuous target-side feature vector and crosses it with the semantic prefix and user behavior sequence inside the decoder. The crossed representation conditions current-level generation and is directly used for ranking. Continuous-vector regression risks a learnable target collapsing with its prediction and prediction noise propagating into generation through attention. TacGR addresses these challenges with a semantic-anchoring auxiliary tower and a unidirectional visibility mask, respectively. For extremely long industrial behavior histories, it introduces gated convolutional denoising to suppress noise and adapts the pyramid memory funnel to reduce inference cost. Offline experiments on a large-scale Lazada dataset show significant gains over OneRec, UniRec, and UniSGR. Online A/B testing improves IPV, Order, and GMV by 0.79%, 5.55%, and 3.09%, respectively.

Mon 12 OctInformation Retrieval
The gist
Recommender systems try to suggest items you might like based on your past behavior and item features. The authors found that current generative recommendation models lack direct access to the features of the item they are predicting, which can hurt accuracy. They created a method that guesses these item features step-by-step during the recommendation process and combines them with user data to improve suggestions. Their approach also manages errors and noise to keep predictions stable and efficient, showing improvements on both offline data and live user tests.
Open → 2610.16132v1

Human-inspired method improves learning in large decision spaces

Human-inspired, Task-Dimension-Guided Exploration for Efficient Learning in High Dimensions

Abstract: Efficient exploration in high-dimensional decision spaces remains a central challenge for decision-making systems. Humans, in contrast, can navigate large decision spaces with remarkable efficiency. Recent behavioral studies suggest that humans reduce dimensionality in large decision spaces by probing candidate feature dimensions, identifying reward-relevant ones, and restricting the effective decision space. Inspired by this mechanism, we propose TDGE (Task-Dimension-Guided Exploration), a human-inspired, model-agnostic algorithm with an automatically constructed task-dimension--feature--item hierarchy. TDGE follows a top-down exploration strategy: it first selects task-relevant feature dimensions, then identifies informative features within those dimensions, and finally recommends concrete items based on the selected features. Experiments on MovieLens-20M, Last.fm, and Amazon recommendation datasets show that TDGE substantially improves exploration efficiency and cold-start adaptation over baseline algorithms. Comparisons with other structured algorithms and ablation studies attribute these gains to TDGE's hierarchical structure and semantic feature-space exploration, with robust results across clustering methods and hierarchy depths. Recommendation-trajectory visualizations also show exploration patterns similar to human dimension-guided behavior.

Tue 29 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Exploring many options in complex problems is hard for computers but easy for humans, who focus on important features first. This paper presents TDGE, an algorithm inspired by how humans pick relevant aspects to explore efficiently. TDGE works in steps: choosing important feature groups, then detailed features, and finally making decisions based on those features. Tests on movie, music, and product recommendation datasets show that TDGE learns faster and better than other methods, even when starting with little data.
Open → 2609.36672v1

Recommendation systems improve results by verifying retrieved items

Recommendation Retrievers Need Verifiers: Universal Generative Reranking for Sequential Recommendations

Abstract: First-stage recommenders in multi-stage systems produce a ranked candidate list from which a limited prefix is forwarded to downstream rankers. Because each forwarded item must be processed by more expensive ranking stages, this shortlist cannot be arbitrarily large. The first-stage objective is therefore high coverage of relevant items within the forwarded prefix, commonly measured by Recall@$k$. A relevant item may be available deeper in the retrieved list but absent from the shorter prefix that is actually consumed. This paper studies post-hoc verification for promoting such candidates into the consumed shortlist without retraining or replacing the retriever. We introduce a lightweight generative verifier for retrieval models. Given a retriever state and a candidate item, the verifier scores the item through the likelihood of its identifier tokens. It is trained post hoc with next-token cross entropy, requires no sampled negatives or candidate pool during training, and scores only the retriever's top-$K$ candidates at inference. The interface is minimal: the retriever supplies a query state and candidate items, and the item representation can use any fixed tokenization. Across Amazon product recommendation and YaMBDa music recommendation, the same verifier training recipe improves Recall@10 for SASRec, GRU4Rec, NextItNet, and MiniOneRec. Ablations show that the improvements are not explained solely by injecting item-content features into the retriever, supporting verification as a post-hoc output-side adaptation mechanism.

Thu 10 SeptInformation RetrievalArtificial Intelligence
The gist
Many modern recommendation systems pick a short list of items to show users, but sometimes good items are missed because they appear further down the list. The authors propose an additional step that rechecks the candidate items using a small, extra model, called a verifier, which decides if some of the skipped items should be promoted into the final list. This verifier is simple to add after the main recommendation model is trained and helps catch relevant items earlier without retraining the original model. Tests on Amazon and music recommendation data show improvements across various well-known recommendation methods.
Open → 2609.12270v1