Papers for

ecological monitoring teams

Papers whose findings have a practical use for this group, as judged from the abstract. Open a paper to read what it means in practice.

Active learning improves labeling for ecological sound monitoring

BioDCASE: Active Learning for Bioacoustics

Abstract: Ecological monitoring increasingly relies on machine learning models, whose performance depends on the quality and quantity of labelled data. However, obtaining these labels is costly, particularly in passive acoustic monitoring, where vast amounts of data are collected but only a small proportion can feasibly be annotated. Active learning addresses this bottleneck by prioritizing which samples should be labelled. However, progress is difficult to measure, because published methods are evaluated under different models, budgets, evaluation metrics and datasets. To address this challenge, we present the 2026 Active Learning for Bioacoustics BioDCASE challenge: a systematic evaluation of sampling methods designed to identify effective AL strategies. Participant methods were evaluated across four subsets composed of terrestrial and marine data. Across ten proposed sampling methods from seven teams, the top-ranked method achieved an area under the learning curve 26.4 % higher than random sampling at the same annotation budget, averaged over four data subsets. Significant variation in performance was observed across subsets, with the top-performing submission achieving a 67.1 % gain for the HSN subset over random sampling and a gain of 8 % for the ATBFL subset. Top-ranking submissions combined multiple acquisition signals, and diversity-based selection outperformed pure uncertainty sampling. Furthermore, there is evidence that transitioning from diversity-based to uncertainty-based selection and explicitly reducing redundancy within acquisition batches improve model training. There is also initial evidence that larger acquisition batch sizes may be increasingly beneficial later in the labelling process.

Mon 14 SeptMachine LearningSound
The gist
Machine learning models for monitoring animal sounds need lots of labeled examples, but labeling is costly because many recordings exist. The authors organized a challenge to compare different ways of picking which sounds to label first. They found that the best methods improved learning by over 25% compared to picking examples randomly. Combining diversity and uncertainty in choosing sounds to label worked better than using just one approach. These findings help make better use of labeling efforts for ecological sound data.
Open 2609.15255v1

Wavelet methods improve bird song recognition in noisy environments

Processing and classifying bird songs using wavelet techniques and supervised learning

Abstract: This study proposes an integrated framework for the processing and classification of invasive bird species vocalizations within natural soundscapes, characterized by high levels of environmental noise. We address the challenge of signal degradation by employing a Bayesian wavelet shrinkage methodology based on the Epanechnikov kernel prior, which offers a closed form decision rule and high computational efficiency for processing large bioacoustic datasets. The methodology was applied to recordings of three species obtained from the iNaturalist platform: \textit{Euphonia violacea}, \textit{Leiothrix lutea}, and \textit{Passer domesticus}. After signal denoising, we extracted a comprehensive set of features, including Mel-Frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCCs) and spectral indices such as entropy and zero-crossing rate. Several supervised learning models: Random Forest, Multinomial Logistic Regression and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were evaluated across different feature dimensionalities. Our results demonstrate that the proposed wavelet based preprocessing significantly enhances classification performance, with the SVM model achieving the highest accuracy (up to 0.9398) under a 10-dimensional MFCC configuration. This research provides a robust statistical tool for automated ecological monitoring and the management of biological invasions.

Wed 9 SeptMachine Learning
The gist
Bird songs recorded in nature often get mixed with a lot of background noise, making it hard to identify species. The authors used a special wavelet technique to clean these noisy sounds efficiently. Then, they used machine learning models to classify three bird species by their songs. Their method improved the accuracy of identifying the birds, especially when using a support vector machine model. This helps in tracking invasive bird species and understanding natural environments better.
Open 2609.10826v1